Two-Stage Analysis Method for the Mechanical Response of Adjacent Existing Tunnels Caused by Foundation Pit Excavation

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.2246
• Main Authors: Mao, Hongtao, Hu, Zhinan, Wang, Wenzheng, Liu, Zhichun, Yang, Huijun, Li, Biao, Wang, Yonggang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Analysis; Construction; Deformation; Deformation analysis; Dewatering; Engineering; Error analysis; Excavation; existing tunnel; foundation pit construction; Foundations; Friction; Internal forces; Load; Mechanical analysis; mechanical response; Methods; Nonlinear systems; Nonuniformity; Numerical analysis; Research methodology; Simulation methods; Soil analysis; Soil mechanics; Soil stresses; theoretical analysis; Tunnel construction; Tunnels; two-stage analysis method; Unloading
• ISSN: 2075-5309; 2075-5309
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings14072246

With the advancement of urban underground space networks, there has been a rise in foundation pit projects near existing tunnels. The construction of these foundation pits adjacent to existing tunnels can result in soil disturbance and stress redistribution, leading to additional deformation and internal force within the tunnels. This paper delves into the two-stage analysis method, outlining the calculation of additional stress in the initial stage considering various engineering factors and the methods for determining tunnel displacement and internal force in the subsequent stage. Through an engineering example and numerical simulations, the theoretical calculations were validated. The maximum displacement generated by the tunnel is −4.85 mm and −5.10 mm, respectively. The maximum error is only 5.9%, which confirms the validity of the theoretical approach. The analysis demonstrates that incorporating the unloading model of the bottom and surrounding side walls of the foundation pit is essential when calculating additional stress in the first stage. Moreover, the presence of engineering dewatering and double-hole tunnels can counterbalance the additional stress, with deviations of only 4.4% and 2.5%, respectively. In the second stage, factoring in the shear action and lateral soil action in the foundation and tunnel model enhances the accuracy of stress mode representation (accuracy increased by 18.8% and 29.3%, respectively). Additionally, accounting for the buried depth effect of the tunnel, soil non-uniformity, and foundation nonlinearity helps prevent excessive foundation reactions.