Loading…

Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors

It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to the physician directors...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of intensive care 2022-03, Vol.10 (1), p.18-18, Article 18
Main Authors: Igarashi, Yuko, Tanaka, Yuta, Ito, Kaori, Miyashita, Mitsunori, Kinoshita, Satomi, Kato, Akane, Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c755t-932d610686ad1993565a60f1a3c28a1d62341c3c17e6f4f7ab30bf13e2af60e53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c755t-932d610686ad1993565a60f1a3c28a1d62341c3c17e6f4f7ab30bf13e2af60e53
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Journal of intensive care
container_volume 10
creator Igarashi, Yuko
Tanaka, Yuta
Ito, Kaori
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Kinoshita, Satomi
Kato, Akane
Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
description It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to the physician directors of all 873 ICUs in Japan in August 2020. Of the 873 institutions, 439 responded the questionnaire (response rate: 50%) and 413 responses were included in the analysis. The responding physicians thought palliative care was appropriate for physical symptoms (36%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 32-41), the provision of information (32%, 95% CI: 28-37), psychological distress (25%, 95% CI: 21-29) and in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) prevention (20%, 95% CI: 17-24). Only 4% (95% CI: 2-6) of participants indicated that they always provided palliative care screening for the patients admitted to the ICU. The most common method to determine eligibility for palliative care was the "prediction of prognosis by clinician's experience" (54%, 95% CI: 50-59). Thirty-one percent (95% CI: 27-36) of participants responded that there was no clear method used to decide which patients need palliative care. Fifty-four percent of the participants answered they had no standardized protocols for symptom management at all. Less than 5% answered they had standardized protocols for end-of-life symptom management or terminal weaning off mechanical ventilation including extubation of endotracheal tubes. In Japan, the dissemination of palliative care and its integration into ICU care appears insufficient. To improve the quality of life of patients who are admitted to ICU, it may be useful to implement palliative care screening and multidisciplinary conferences, to develop standardized protocols for symptom management and withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, and to educate primary palliative care for all ICU physicians.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40560-022-00605-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_902995a2112045c2a5d0c20e866b1593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A697404374</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_902995a2112045c2a5d0c20e866b1593</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A697404374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c755t-932d610686ad1993565a60f1a3c28a1d62341c3c17e6f4f7ab30bf13e2af60e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks-O2yAQxq2qVXe13RfooUKqVPXi7QAG2z1UWkX9k2qlXrpnNAGcsCLGBTtVXqNPXJxsV4lUcQCGb34wzFcUryncUNrID6kCIaEExkoACaJsnhWXDETeVi17frK-KK5TegAACoLLpn1ZXHDBgbeyviz-LKYYbT-SNOI4JRI6MqD3Dke3s0RjtMRYn9dxT7A3JFnfldEOIY7WkCGiHp22xPVkubhP8_wdB-w_EiR9ZoT-tzOZE0NKZbJ6jqAnaYo7uz9cttknpx32xLiYz0NMr4oXHfpkrx_nq-L-y-efi2_l3Y-vy8XtXalrIcay5cxICrKRaGjbciEFSugocs0apEYyXlHNNa2t7KquxhWHVUe5ZdhJsIJfFcsj1wR8UEN0W4x7FdCpQyDEtcKYq_NWtcDaViCjlEElNENhQDOwjZQrKlqeWZ-OrGFaba3R-Ucj-jPo-UnvNmoddqrJZeR2ZsD7R0AMvyabRrV1SVvvsbdhSorJCvITJK2y9O1Rusb8NNd3IRP1LFe3sq0rqHg9q27-o8rD2K3Tobedy_GzhHcnCRuLftyk4Ke5ZelcyI7CQ1ej7Z7KpKBmb6qjN1X2pjp4UzU56c3pBz2l_HMi_wu3qt7E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640995614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Igarashi, Yuko ; Tanaka, Yuta ; Ito, Kaori ; Miyashita, Mitsunori ; Kinoshita, Satomi ; Kato, Akane ; Kizawa, Yoshiyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Igarashi, Yuko ; Tanaka, Yuta ; Ito, Kaori ; Miyashita, Mitsunori ; Kinoshita, Satomi ; Kato, Akane ; Kizawa, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><description>It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to the physician directors of all 873 ICUs in Japan in August 2020. Of the 873 institutions, 439 responded the questionnaire (response rate: 50%) and 413 responses were included in the analysis. The responding physicians thought palliative care was appropriate for physical symptoms (36%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 32-41), the provision of information (32%, 95% CI: 28-37), psychological distress (25%, 95% CI: 21-29) and in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) prevention (20%, 95% CI: 17-24). Only 4% (95% CI: 2-6) of participants indicated that they always provided palliative care screening for the patients admitted to the ICU. The most common method to determine eligibility for palliative care was the "prediction of prognosis by clinician's experience" (54%, 95% CI: 50-59). Thirty-one percent (95% CI: 27-36) of participants responded that there was no clear method used to decide which patients need palliative care. Fifty-four percent of the participants answered they had no standardized protocols for symptom management at all. Less than 5% answered they had standardized protocols for end-of-life symptom management or terminal weaning off mechanical ventilation including extubation of endotracheal tubes. In Japan, the dissemination of palliative care and its integration into ICU care appears insufficient. To improve the quality of life of patients who are admitted to ICU, it may be useful to implement palliative care screening and multidisciplinary conferences, to develop standardized protocols for symptom management and withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, and to educate primary palliative care for all ICU physicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-0492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-0492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40560-022-00605-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35303967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Intensive care unit ; Life-sustaining treatments ; Medicine ; Nation-wide survey ; Palliative care ; Palliative care screening ; Palliative treatment ; Physicians ; Practice ; Stress (Psychology) ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Journal of intensive care, 2022-03, Vol.10 (1), p.18-18, Article 18</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c755t-932d610686ad1993565a60f1a3c28a1d62341c3c17e6f4f7ab30bf13e2af60e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c755t-932d610686ad1993565a60f1a3c28a1d62341c3c17e6f4f7ab30bf13e2af60e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2456-5092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932186/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932186/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Igarashi, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Mitsunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Satomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Akane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors</title><title>Journal of intensive care</title><addtitle>J Intensive Care</addtitle><description>It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to the physician directors of all 873 ICUs in Japan in August 2020. Of the 873 institutions, 439 responded the questionnaire (response rate: 50%) and 413 responses were included in the analysis. The responding physicians thought palliative care was appropriate for physical symptoms (36%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 32-41), the provision of information (32%, 95% CI: 28-37), psychological distress (25%, 95% CI: 21-29) and in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) prevention (20%, 95% CI: 17-24). Only 4% (95% CI: 2-6) of participants indicated that they always provided palliative care screening for the patients admitted to the ICU. The most common method to determine eligibility for palliative care was the "prediction of prognosis by clinician's experience" (54%, 95% CI: 50-59). Thirty-one percent (95% CI: 27-36) of participants responded that there was no clear method used to decide which patients need palliative care. Fifty-four percent of the participants answered they had no standardized protocols for symptom management at all. Less than 5% answered they had standardized protocols for end-of-life symptom management or terminal weaning off mechanical ventilation including extubation of endotracheal tubes. In Japan, the dissemination of palliative care and its integration into ICU care appears insufficient. To improve the quality of life of patients who are admitted to ICU, it may be useful to implement palliative care screening and multidisciplinary conferences, to develop standardized protocols for symptom management and withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, and to educate primary palliative care for all ICU physicians.</description><subject>Intensive care unit</subject><subject>Life-sustaining treatments</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Nation-wide survey</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative care screening</subject><subject>Palliative treatment</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Stress (Psychology)</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>2052-0492</issn><issn>2052-0492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks-O2yAQxq2qVXe13RfooUKqVPXi7QAG2z1UWkX9k2qlXrpnNAGcsCLGBTtVXqNPXJxsV4lUcQCGb34wzFcUryncUNrID6kCIaEExkoACaJsnhWXDETeVi17frK-KK5TegAACoLLpn1ZXHDBgbeyviz-LKYYbT-SNOI4JRI6MqD3Dke3s0RjtMRYn9dxT7A3JFnfldEOIY7WkCGiHp22xPVkubhP8_wdB-w_EiR9ZoT-tzOZE0NKZbJ6jqAnaYo7uz9cttknpx32xLiYz0NMr4oXHfpkrx_nq-L-y-efi2_l3Y-vy8XtXalrIcay5cxICrKRaGjbciEFSugocs0apEYyXlHNNa2t7KquxhWHVUe5ZdhJsIJfFcsj1wR8UEN0W4x7FdCpQyDEtcKYq_NWtcDaViCjlEElNENhQDOwjZQrKlqeWZ-OrGFaba3R-Ucj-jPo-UnvNmoddqrJZeR2ZsD7R0AMvyabRrV1SVvvsbdhSorJCvITJK2y9O1Rusb8NNd3IRP1LFe3sq0rqHg9q27-o8rD2K3Tobedy_GzhHcnCRuLftyk4Ke5ZelcyI7CQ1ej7Z7KpKBmb6qjN1X2pjp4UzU56c3pBz2l_HMi_wu3qt7E</recordid><startdate>20220318</startdate><enddate>20220318</enddate><creator>Igarashi, Yuko</creator><creator>Tanaka, Yuta</creator><creator>Ito, Kaori</creator><creator>Miyashita, Mitsunori</creator><creator>Kinoshita, Satomi</creator><creator>Kato, Akane</creator><creator>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-5092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220318</creationdate><title>Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors</title><author>Igarashi, Yuko ; Tanaka, Yuta ; Ito, Kaori ; Miyashita, Mitsunori ; Kinoshita, Satomi ; Kato, Akane ; Kizawa, Yoshiyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c755t-932d610686ad1993565a60f1a3c28a1d62341c3c17e6f4f7ab30bf13e2af60e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Intensive care unit</topic><topic>Life-sustaining treatments</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Nation-wide survey</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative care screening</topic><topic>Palliative treatment</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Stress (Psychology)</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Igarashi, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Mitsunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Satomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Akane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Igarashi, Yuko</au><au>Tanaka, Yuta</au><au>Ito, Kaori</au><au>Miyashita, Mitsunori</au><au>Kinoshita, Satomi</au><au>Kato, Akane</au><au>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>J Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2022-03-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>18-18</pages><artnum>18</artnum><issn>2052-0492</issn><eissn>2052-0492</eissn><abstract>It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to the physician directors of all 873 ICUs in Japan in August 2020. Of the 873 institutions, 439 responded the questionnaire (response rate: 50%) and 413 responses were included in the analysis. The responding physicians thought palliative care was appropriate for physical symptoms (36%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 32-41), the provision of information (32%, 95% CI: 28-37), psychological distress (25%, 95% CI: 21-29) and in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) prevention (20%, 95% CI: 17-24). Only 4% (95% CI: 2-6) of participants indicated that they always provided palliative care screening for the patients admitted to the ICU. The most common method to determine eligibility for palliative care was the "prediction of prognosis by clinician's experience" (54%, 95% CI: 50-59). Thirty-one percent (95% CI: 27-36) of participants responded that there was no clear method used to decide which patients need palliative care. Fifty-four percent of the participants answered they had no standardized protocols for symptom management at all. Less than 5% answered they had standardized protocols for end-of-life symptom management or terminal weaning off mechanical ventilation including extubation of endotracheal tubes. In Japan, the dissemination of palliative care and its integration into ICU care appears insufficient. To improve the quality of life of patients who are admitted to ICU, it may be useful to implement palliative care screening and multidisciplinary conferences, to develop standardized protocols for symptom management and withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, and to educate primary palliative care for all ICU physicians.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35303967</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40560-022-00605-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-5092</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2052-0492
ispartof Journal of intensive care, 2022-03, Vol.10 (1), p.18-18, Article 18
issn 2052-0492
2052-0492
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_902995a2112045c2a5d0c20e866b1593
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Intensive care unit
Life-sustaining treatments
Medicine
Nation-wide survey
Palliative care
Palliative care screening
Palliative treatment
Physicians
Practice
Stress (Psychology)
Surveys
title Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20status%20of%20palliative%20care%20delivery%20and%20self-reported%20practice%20in%20ICUs%20in%20Japan:%20a%20nationwide%20cross-sectional%20survey%20of%20physician%20directors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intensive%20care&rft.au=Igarashi,%20Yuko&rft.date=2022-03-18&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=18-18&rft.artnum=18&rft.issn=2052-0492&rft.eissn=2052-0492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40560-022-00605-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA697404374%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c755t-932d610686ad1993565a60f1a3c28a1d62341c3c17e6f4f7ab30bf13e2af60e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640995614&rft_id=info:pmid/35303967&rft_galeid=A697404374&rfr_iscdi=true