Loading…

Comparison of the clinical characteristics and comprehensive assessments of the 2011 and 2017 GOLD classifications for patients with COPD in China

Compared with the 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), there have been significant changes in the 2017 GOLD classification. The purpose of this study was to analyze the changes in clinical characteristics of the new A-B-C-D system and to explore its role in comprehensi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2018-01, Vol.13, p.3011-3019
Main Authors: Hu, Yu-He, Liang, Zhen-Yu, Xu, Li-Mei, Xu, Wen-Hui, Liao, Hao, Li, Rui, Wang, Kai, Xu, Ying, Ou, Chun-Quan, Chen, Xin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Compared with the 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), there have been significant changes in the 2017 GOLD classification. The purpose of this study was to analyze the changes in clinical characteristics of the new A-B-C-D system and to explore its role in comprehensive assessment of COPD. A total of 631 stable COPD patients were included in a cross-sectional survey. Data collected included baseline data and pulmonary function testing results, respiratory muscle strength, symptoms and quality of life, exercise capacity, nutritional status, and anxiety and depression as a comprehensive assessment. Based on the 2011 GOLD and 2017 GOLD classifications, patients were divided into Groups A -D and Groups A -D , respectively. In the 2011 GOLD, 64 subjects in Group C were reclassified into Group A (41.6%), while 77 subjects in Group D were reclassified into Group B (27.1%). The old and new grading systems were somewhat consistent (Cohen's kappa=0.6963,
ISSN:1178-2005
1176-9106
1178-2005
DOI:10.2147/COPD.S174668