Loading…
Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N2O production in tropical peat soil microcosms
Chemodenitrification – the non-enzymatic process of nitrite reduction – may be an important sink for fixed nitrogen in tropical peatlands. Rates and products of chemodenitrification are dependent on O2, pH, Fe2+ concentration, and organic matter composition, which are variable across peat soils. Ass...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biogeosciences 2019-12, Vol.16 (23), p.4601-4612 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 4612 |
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 4601 |
container_title | Biogeosciences |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Buessecker, Steffen Tylor, Kaitlyn Nye, Joshua Holbert, Keith E Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D Glass, Jennifer B Hartnett, Hilairy E Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby |
description | Chemodenitrification – the non-enzymatic process of nitrite reduction – may be an important sink for fixed nitrogen in tropical peatlands. Rates and products of chemodenitrification are dependent on O2, pH, Fe2+ concentration, and organic matter composition, which are variable across peat soils. Assessing abiotic reaction pathways is difficult because sterilization and inhibition agents can alter the availability of reactants by changing iron speciation and organic matter composition. We compared six commonly used soil sterilization techniques – γ irradiation, chloroform, autoclaving, and the use of three different chemical inhibitors (mercury, zinc, and azide) – for their compatibility with chemodenitrification assays for tropical peatland soils (organic-rich, low-pH soil from the eastern Amazon). Out of the six techniques, γ irradiation resulted in soil treatments with the lowest cell viability and denitrification activity and the least effect on pH, iron speciation, and organic matter composition. Nitrite depletion rates in γ-irradiated soils were highly similar to untreated (live) soils, whereas other sterilization techniques showed deviations. Chemodenitrification was a dominant process of nitrite consumption in tropical peatland soils assayed in this study. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is one possible product of chemodenitrification reactions. Abiotic N2O production was low to moderate (3 %–16 % of converted nitrite), and different sterilization techniques lead to significant variations on production rates due to inherent processes or potential artifacts. Our work represents the first methodological basis for testing the abiotic denitrification and N2O production potential in tropical peatland soil. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/bg-16-4601-2019 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_90b364e669264e039b62383ceb7d9fc7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_90b364e669264e039b62383ceb7d9fc7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2321357507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d249t-ab855577546d4b028e0dcae66dbc7c492533d0d0439d7bcd61b4cc48be3531e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwHPq_nO5iilakHsRc9LvrZN2d3UJD3oX29sxdMb3rz5MTMA3GJ0z7FiD2bTYNEwgXBDEFZnYIYlqQZu1fl_LdEluMp5hxBtUctnIC773tuSYexhLj6FIXzrEuIEi7fbKXwefO1N0G79GJ2fQkmhD_YU0ZODb2QN9ym6gz1aoQ6muK-JAe69LjDHMMAx2BRtzGO-Bhe9HrK_-dM5-Hhavi9emtf182rx-No4wlRptGk551JyJhwziLQeOau9EM5YaZkinFKHHGJUOWmsE9gwa1lrPOUUe0LnYHXiuqh33T6FUaevLurQHY2YNp1OJdjBdwoZKlhlK1IFUWUEoS213kineisr6-7Eqnf-_qN0u3hIU12_I5RgyiVHkv4Ab0B2JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2321357507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N2O production in tropical peat soil microcosms</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Buessecker, Steffen ; Tylor, Kaitlyn ; Nye, Joshua ; Holbert, Keith E ; Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D ; Glass, Jennifer B ; Hartnett, Hilairy E ; Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby</creator><creatorcontrib>Buessecker, Steffen ; Tylor, Kaitlyn ; Nye, Joshua ; Holbert, Keith E ; Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D ; Glass, Jennifer B ; Hartnett, Hilairy E ; Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby</creatorcontrib><description>Chemodenitrification – the non-enzymatic process of nitrite reduction – may be an important sink for fixed nitrogen in tropical peatlands. Rates and products of chemodenitrification are dependent on O2, pH, Fe2+ concentration, and organic matter composition, which are variable across peat soils. Assessing abiotic reaction pathways is difficult because sterilization and inhibition agents can alter the availability of reactants by changing iron speciation and organic matter composition. We compared six commonly used soil sterilization techniques – γ irradiation, chloroform, autoclaving, and the use of three different chemical inhibitors (mercury, zinc, and azide) – for their compatibility with chemodenitrification assays for tropical peatland soils (organic-rich, low-pH soil from the eastern Amazon). Out of the six techniques, γ irradiation resulted in soil treatments with the lowest cell viability and denitrification activity and the least effect on pH, iron speciation, and organic matter composition. Nitrite depletion rates in γ-irradiated soils were highly similar to untreated (live) soils, whereas other sterilization techniques showed deviations. Chemodenitrification was a dominant process of nitrite consumption in tropical peatland soils assayed in this study. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is one possible product of chemodenitrification reactions. Abiotic N2O production was low to moderate (3 %–16 % of converted nitrite), and different sterilization techniques lead to significant variations on production rates due to inherent processes or potential artifacts. Our work represents the first methodological basis for testing the abiotic denitrification and N2O production potential in tropical peatland soil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/bg-16-4601-2019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Autoclaving ; Cell viability ; Chloroform ; Composition ; Denitrification ; Depletion ; Iron ; Irradiation ; Mercury ; Microcosms ; Nitrites ; Nitrous oxide ; Organic chemistry ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Peat ; Peat soils ; Peatlands ; pH effects ; Radiation ; Soil ; Soil treatment ; Speciation ; Sterilization ; Test procedures ; Tropical climate ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Biogeosciences, 2019-12, Vol.16 (23), p.4601-4612</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2321357507/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2321357507?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buessecker, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylor, Kaitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nye, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holbert, Keith E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, Jennifer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartnett, Hilairy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N2O production in tropical peat soil microcosms</title><title>Biogeosciences</title><description>Chemodenitrification – the non-enzymatic process of nitrite reduction – may be an important sink for fixed nitrogen in tropical peatlands. Rates and products of chemodenitrification are dependent on O2, pH, Fe2+ concentration, and organic matter composition, which are variable across peat soils. Assessing abiotic reaction pathways is difficult because sterilization and inhibition agents can alter the availability of reactants by changing iron speciation and organic matter composition. We compared six commonly used soil sterilization techniques – γ irradiation, chloroform, autoclaving, and the use of three different chemical inhibitors (mercury, zinc, and azide) – for their compatibility with chemodenitrification assays for tropical peatland soils (organic-rich, low-pH soil from the eastern Amazon). Out of the six techniques, γ irradiation resulted in soil treatments with the lowest cell viability and denitrification activity and the least effect on pH, iron speciation, and organic matter composition. Nitrite depletion rates in γ-irradiated soils were highly similar to untreated (live) soils, whereas other sterilization techniques showed deviations. Chemodenitrification was a dominant process of nitrite consumption in tropical peatland soils assayed in this study. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is one possible product of chemodenitrification reactions. Abiotic N2O production was low to moderate (3 %–16 % of converted nitrite), and different sterilization techniques lead to significant variations on production rates due to inherent processes or potential artifacts. Our work represents the first methodological basis for testing the abiotic denitrification and N2O production potential in tropical peatland soil.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Autoclaving</subject><subject>Cell viability</subject><subject>Chloroform</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Microcosms</subject><subject>Nitrites</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>Peat soils</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>1726-4170</issn><issn>1726-4189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwHPq_nO5iilakHsRc9LvrZN2d3UJD3oX29sxdMb3rz5MTMA3GJ0z7FiD2bTYNEwgXBDEFZnYIYlqQZu1fl_LdEluMp5hxBtUctnIC773tuSYexhLj6FIXzrEuIEi7fbKXwefO1N0G79GJ2fQkmhD_YU0ZODb2QN9ym6gz1aoQ6muK-JAe69LjDHMMAx2BRtzGO-Bhe9HrK_-dM5-Hhavi9emtf182rx-No4wlRptGk551JyJhwziLQeOau9EM5YaZkinFKHHGJUOWmsE9gwa1lrPOUUe0LnYHXiuqh33T6FUaevLurQHY2YNp1OJdjBdwoZKlhlK1IFUWUEoS213kineisr6-7Eqnf-_qN0u3hIU12_I5RgyiVHkv4Ab0B2JQ</recordid><startdate>20191205</startdate><enddate>20191205</enddate><creator>Buessecker, Steffen</creator><creator>Tylor, Kaitlyn</creator><creator>Nye, Joshua</creator><creator>Holbert, Keith E</creator><creator>Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D</creator><creator>Glass, Jennifer B</creator><creator>Hartnett, Hilairy E</creator><creator>Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191205</creationdate><title>Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N2O production in tropical peat soil microcosms</title><author>Buessecker, Steffen ; Tylor, Kaitlyn ; Nye, Joshua ; Holbert, Keith E ; Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D ; Glass, Jennifer B ; Hartnett, Hilairy E ; Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d249t-ab855577546d4b028e0dcae66dbc7c492533d0d0439d7bcd61b4cc48be3531e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Autoclaving</topic><topic>Cell viability</topic><topic>Chloroform</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Microcosms</topic><topic>Nitrites</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>Peat soils</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buessecker, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylor, Kaitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nye, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holbert, Keith E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, Jennifer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartnett, Hilairy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby</creatorcontrib><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buessecker, Steffen</au><au>Tylor, Kaitlyn</au><au>Nye, Joshua</au><au>Holbert, Keith E</au><au>Urquiza Muñoz, Jose D</au><au>Glass, Jennifer B</au><au>Hartnett, Hilairy E</au><au>Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N2O production in tropical peat soil microcosms</atitle><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2019-12-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>4601</spage><epage>4612</epage><pages>4601-4612</pages><issn>1726-4170</issn><eissn>1726-4189</eissn><abstract>Chemodenitrification – the non-enzymatic process of nitrite reduction – may be an important sink for fixed nitrogen in tropical peatlands. Rates and products of chemodenitrification are dependent on O2, pH, Fe2+ concentration, and organic matter composition, which are variable across peat soils. Assessing abiotic reaction pathways is difficult because sterilization and inhibition agents can alter the availability of reactants by changing iron speciation and organic matter composition. We compared six commonly used soil sterilization techniques – γ irradiation, chloroform, autoclaving, and the use of three different chemical inhibitors (mercury, zinc, and azide) – for their compatibility with chemodenitrification assays for tropical peatland soils (organic-rich, low-pH soil from the eastern Amazon). Out of the six techniques, γ irradiation resulted in soil treatments with the lowest cell viability and denitrification activity and the least effect on pH, iron speciation, and organic matter composition. Nitrite depletion rates in γ-irradiated soils were highly similar to untreated (live) soils, whereas other sterilization techniques showed deviations. Chemodenitrification was a dominant process of nitrite consumption in tropical peatland soils assayed in this study. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is one possible product of chemodenitrification reactions. Abiotic N2O production was low to moderate (3 %–16 % of converted nitrite), and different sterilization techniques lead to significant variations on production rates due to inherent processes or potential artifacts. Our work represents the first methodological basis for testing the abiotic denitrification and N2O production potential in tropical peatland soil.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/bg-16-4601-2019</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1726-4170 |
ispartof | Biogeosciences, 2019-12, Vol.16 (23), p.4601-4612 |
issn | 1726-4170 1726-4189 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_90b364e669264e039b62383ceb7d9fc7 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Abiotic factors Autoclaving Cell viability Chloroform Composition Denitrification Depletion Iron Irradiation Mercury Microcosms Nitrites Nitrous oxide Organic chemistry Organic matter Organic soils Peat Peat soils Peatlands pH effects Radiation Soil Soil treatment Speciation Sterilization Test procedures Tropical climate Zinc |
title | Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N2O production in tropical peat soil microcosms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A15%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20sterilization%20techniques%20on%20chemodenitrification%20and%20N2O%20production%20in%20tropical%20peat%20soil%20microcosms&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Buessecker,%20Steffen&rft.date=2019-12-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=4601&rft.epage=4612&rft.pages=4601-4612&rft.issn=1726-4170&rft.eissn=1726-4189&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/bg-16-4601-2019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2321357507%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d249t-ab855577546d4b028e0dcae66dbc7c492533d0d0439d7bcd61b4cc48be3531e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2321357507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |