Loading…

EXTRINSIC CALIBRATION OF ROTATING 2D LASER RANGE FINDER AND CAMERA USING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TEST FIELD AND PING PONG BALLS

In this article, a method for the extrinsic calibration of a 2D laser range finder and a camera is presented. This technique produces a 3D point cloud from the test field by connecting a laser range finder to a servomotor. In this study, ping balls and standard photogrammetric targets were employed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 2023-01, Vol.X-4/W1-2022, p.475-481
Main Authors: Manouchehri, M. A., Hosseininaveh Ahmadabadian, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this article, a method for the extrinsic calibration of a 2D laser range finder and a camera is presented. This technique produces a 3D point cloud from the test field by connecting a laser range finder to a servomotor. In this study, ping balls and standard photogrammetric targets were employed as a test field. Ping pong balls are used because they can be easily recognized in data from laser range finder and camera. To calculate extrinsic calibration parameters between a camera and laser range finder, these balls are employed as control points in the data. The extrinsic calibration of the Laser range finder and camera is carried out using the point cloud created from the test field and the photos captured from the test field. In this method, a sphere is fitted to each ping pong ball's points in the 3D point cloud, and the coordinates of that sphere's center are taken to be the coordinates of that ball. By measuring the distances between various targets in the test field, the scale can be resolved. This approach was compared with another state-of-the-art method. The proposed method is more accurate and stable than the alternative way, taking into account the average inaccuracy of check points.
ISSN:2194-9050
2194-9042
2194-9050
DOI:10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-475-2023