Designing a network of critical zone observatories to explore the living skin of the terrestrial Earth

• Published in: Earth surface dynamics 2017-12, Vol.5 (4), p.841-860
• Main Authors: Brantley, Susan L, McDowell, William H, Dietrich, William E, White, Timothy S, Kumar, Praveen, Anderson, Suzanne P, Chorover, Jon, Lohse, Kathleen Ann, Bales, Roger C, Richter, Daniel D, Grant, Gordon, Gaillardet, Jerome
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Anthropogenic factors; Baseline studies; Bedrock; Biota; Canopies; Canopy; Catastrophic events; Chemistry; Creeks & streams; Drilling; Earth; Earth science; Ecosystems; Energy measurement; Environment models; Evolution; Fluxes; Gases; Geophysics; Groundwater; Human influences; Hypotheses; Imaging techniques; Instrumentation; Interdisciplinary aspects; Landforms; Landscape; Mineralogy; Minerals; Monitoring; Observatories; Questions; Regolith; Researchers; Scientists; Sediment; Sediments; Sensors; Skin; Soil; Soil sciences; Solutes; Terrestrial planets; Testing; Vegetation management
• ISSN: 2196-632X; 2196-6311; 2196-632X
• DOI: 10.5194/esurf-5-841-2017

The critical zone (CZ), the dynamic living skin of the Earth, extends from the top of the vegetative canopy through the soil and down to fresh bedrock and the bottom of the groundwater. All humans live in and depend on the CZ. This zone has three co-evolving surfaces: the top of the vegetative canopy, the ground surface, and a deep subsurface below which Earth's materials are unweathered. The network of nine CZ observatories supported by the US National Science Foundation has made advances in three broad areas of CZ research relating to the co-evolving surfaces. First, monitoring has revealed how natural and anthropogenic inputs at the vegetation canopy and ground surface cause subsurface responses in water, regolith structure, minerals, and biotic activity to considerable depths. This response, in turn, impacts aboveground biota and climate. Second, drilling and geophysical imaging now reveal how the deep subsurface of the CZ varies across landscapes, which in turn influences aboveground ecosystems. Third, several new mechanistic models now provide quantitative predictions of the spatial structure of the subsurface of the CZ.Many countries fund critical zone observatories (CZOs) to measure the fluxes of solutes, water, energy, gases, and sediments in the CZ and some relate these observations to the histories of those fluxes recorded in landforms, biota, soils, sediments, and rocks. Each US observatory has succeeded in (i) synthesizing research across disciplines into convergent approaches; (ii) providing long-term measurements to compare across sites; (iii) testing and developing models; (iv) collecting and measuring baseline data for comparison to catastrophic events; (v) stimulating new process-based hypotheses; (vi) catalyzing development of new techniques and instrumentation; (vii) informing the public about the CZ; (viii) mentoring students and teaching about emerging multidisciplinary CZ science; and (ix) discovering new insights about the CZ. Many of these activities can only be accomplished with observatories. Here we review the CZO enterprise in the United States and identify how such observatories could operate in the future as a network designed to generate critical scientific insights. Specifically, we recognize the need for the network to study network-level questions, expand the environments under investigation, accommodate both hypothesis testing and monitoring, and involve more stakeholders. We propose a driving question for future CZ scie