A cross-sectional study on the burden and impact of migraine on work productivity and quality of life in selected workplaces in the Philippines

• Published in: Journal of headache and pain 2020-10, Vol.21 (1), p.125-125, Article 125
• Main Authors: Haw, Nel Jason, Cabaluna, Ian Theodore, Kaw, Germaine Erika, Cortez, Joanna Feliz, Chua, Maria Pamela, Guce, Kristel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Burden of disease; Cost of illness; Cross-Sectional Studies; Employees; Female; Generalized linear models; Headache; Health care utilization; Health services utilization; Humans; Internal Medicine; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Migraine; Migraine Disorders - epidemiology; Neurology; Pain Medicine; Philippines; Philippines - epidemiology; Productivity; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Research Article; Workplace
• ISSN: 1129-2369; 1129-2377
• DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01191-6

Background Migraine imposes a substantial personal and economic burden to many working age individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the burden and impact of migraine on work productivity in selected workplaces in the Philippines. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among employees suspected or diagnosed with migraine February to May 2020. Volunteer employees were screened for migraine using the ID-Migraine™ test. Eligible employees were tested for migraine severity and impact on work productivity using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire and additional questions on triggers, coping mechanisms, workplace assistance, and health care utilization were asked. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of migraine disability (high – MIDAS Grade III/IV vs. low – MIDAS Grade I/II). Differences in quality of life scores by migraine disability were measured using multiple linear regression. Productivity costs lost to migraine disability were calculated as the number of days lost to migraine multiplied by the self-reported wage rate, and costs according to migraine severity were measured using a two-part generalized linear model. Results From around 24,000 employees who were invited to participate in the survey, 954 respondents provided consent and attempted to respond to the survey resulting to a response rate of around 4.1%. A total of 511 positive migraine screens were included in the final sample. Females comprised two-thirds of all positive migraine screens and were more likely to have high migraine disability (odds ratio: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.03–2.49) than males. Those with high migraine disability scored lower on role limitations compared to those with low migraine disability. Stress and looking at computer screens were cited as the top trigger for migraine, while sleeping enough hours and getting a massage were cited as top coping mechanisms. Three in four (77%) visited their company clinic within the past 3 months, which meant that most doctors seen for migraine-related symptoms were general practitioners. Five in six (85%) took medication for migraine, almost all of which were over-the-counter medications. Mean annual productivity costs lost due to migraine disability were PHP27 794 (USD556) per person. Conclusion Migraine poses a significant threat to work productivity in the Philippines. Many opportunities, such as disease