Comparison of isotopic mass balance and instrumental techniques as estimates of basin hydrology in seven connected lakes over 12 years

• Published in: Journal of hydrology: X 2020-01, Vol.6, p.100046, Article 100046
• Main Authors: Haig, H.A., Hayes, N.M., Simpson, G.L., Yi, Y., Wissel, B., Hodder, K.R., Leavitt, P.R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: E/I; Long-term monitoring; Mass balance; Residence time; Water isotopes; Water yield
• ISSN: 2589-9155; 2589-9155
• DOI: 10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100046

•Isotope mass balances were compared with instrumental data at 7 lakes for 12 years.•E/I estimates agreed when isotopic models considered upstream hydrology.•Low regional water yield was confirmed using isotopic methods.•Strong agreement between isotope and instrumental inflow measurement methods. Mass-balance models using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen provide useful estimates of the water balance of lakes, particularly in the absence of instrumental data. However, isotopic mass balances are rarely compared directly to measured water fluxes. Here we compared instrumental and isotope-based determinations of water fluxes in seven connected lakes over 12 years to quantify how agreement between the two approaches is affected by lake type and its position in the landscape. Overall, lake-specific ratios of evaporation to inflow (E/I) from instrumental measurements (median, x̃ = 0.06, median absolute deviation, MAD = 0.06) agreed well with isotopic estimates using headwater models (x̃ = 0.14, MAD = 0.08), with the exception of one lake with limited channelized inflow of surface waters (x̃instrumental = 0.51 vs. x̃headwater = 0.24). Isotope-instrument agreement improved (x̃ = 0.09 vs. x̃ = 0.03) when basin-specific (‘best-fit’) isotope models also considered local connectivity to upstream water bodies. Comparison among years revealed that mean isotopic E/I values were lowest in 2011 (mean, μ = 0.06, standard deviation, σ = 0.09) during a 1-in-140 year spring flood, and highest during a relatively arid year, 2003 (μ = 0.22, σ = 0.19), while interannual variability in E/I generally increased with distance downstream along the mainstem of the watershed. Similar patterns of agreement between methods were recorded for water-residence time. Isotope models also documented the expected low water yield from lake catchments (μ = 36.2 mm yr−1, σ = 62.3) suggesting that isotope models based on late-summer samples integrate annual inputs from various sources that are difficult to measure with conventional methods. Overall, the strong positive agreement between methods confirms that water isotopes can provide substantial insights into landscape patterns of lake hydrology, even in ungauged systems.