Loading…
Differential responses of soil nitrogen‐oxide emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation
Tropical and subtropical acidic soils have been well documented as hotspots of global soil nitrogen (N) oxide (i.e., nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions). While the effectiveness of possible mitigation options has been extensively examined in croplands, little is known about their ef...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global change biology. Bioenergy 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1260-1274 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-ae7d7aa3122243d95f3ccd70cb3bf4253dd8491ad40e48403eacfd9035259e43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-ae7d7aa3122243d95f3ccd70cb3bf4253dd8491ad40e48403eacfd9035259e43 |
container_end_page | 1274 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1260 |
container_title | Global change biology. Bioenergy |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Han, Zhaoqiang Wang, Jinyang Xu, Pinshang Li, Zhutao Liu, Shuwei Zou, Jianwen |
description | Tropical and subtropical acidic soils have been well documented as hotspots of global soil nitrogen (N) oxide (i.e., nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions). While the effectiveness of possible mitigation options has been extensively examined in croplands, little is known about their effectiveness in reducing N‐oxide emissions from acidic soils of rapidly expanding tea plantations in China. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to investigate how organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment affect soil N‐oxide emissions from a subtropical tea plantation. Across the 2‐year measurement period, full organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer significantly increased N2O emissions by an average of 17% while had a lower NO emission compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Our global meta‐analysis further revealed that full or partial organic fertilizer substitution resulted in a 29% (95% confidence interval: 5%–60%) increase of N2O emissions from acidic soils. In contrast, irrespective of fertilizer type, biochar amendment significantly reduced N2O emissions by 14% in the first but not second experimental year, suggesting a transient effect. The trade‐off effect of full organic substitution on N2O and NO emissions may be attributed to the favorable conditions for N2O production due to the stimulated activity of nitrifiers and denitrifiers. The suppression of N2O emission following biochar amendment was probably due to promoted further reduction of N2O to dinitrogen. The fertilizer‐induced emission factor (EF) of N2O (2.1%) in the tea plantation was greater than the current IPCC default value, but the EF of NO (0.8%) was comparable to the global estimate. Taken together, while biochar amendment could have mitigation potential, cautions are needed when applying organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer as mitigation options for acidic soils as hotspots of N‐oxide emissions.
Tropical and subtropical acidic soils are hotspots of N‐oxide emissions, but less is known about the effectiveness of climate‐smart agricultural practices in mitigating N‐oxide emissions from tea plantations. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to examine the responses of soil N2O and NO emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation. We found that full organic substitution resulted in an increased N2O but lowered NO emissions compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Biocha |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcbb.12842 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9247cb5bf4b540328e3ed0f7e4604acb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9247cb5bf4b540328e3ed0f7e4604acb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2550176856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-ae7d7aa3122243d95f3ccd70cb3bf4253dd8491ad40e48403eacfd9035259e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-OFCEQxonRxHX04hOQeDOZlb9N99Eddd1kEy97JzQUs0x6oAUmOp58BB_BZ_NJpLfVoySECvWr76tKIfSSkkvazpu9HcdLynrBHqELqqTaUkXU479xN_Cn6FkpB0I62dHhAv18F7yHDLEGM-EMZU6xQMHJ45LChGOoOe0h_vr-I30NDjAcQymhQbgmnPLexGBxOY2lhnqqLYF9yricY72H2lJNvIYpfIOMTXR4DMnemxYfIbp2Kw4Rm0Wg-czBtiYqGDxPJlazyD1HT7yZCrz4827Q3Yf3d7uP29tP1ze7t7dbKwhnWwPKKWM4ZYwJ7gbpubVOETvy0QsmuXO9GKhxgoDoWwkY691AuGRyAME36GaVdckc9JzD0eSzTiboh482qDZtEDuBHphQdpRNdpSLdw8cHPEKREeEaYYb9GrVmnP6fIJS9SGdcmzdayYloarrZdeo1ytlcyolg__nSolelqmXZeqHZTaYrvCXMMH5P6S-3l1drTW_ARqCpwE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550176856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential responses of soil nitrogen‐oxide emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Han, Zhaoqiang ; Wang, Jinyang ; Xu, Pinshang ; Li, Zhutao ; Liu, Shuwei ; Zou, Jianwen</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Zhaoqiang ; Wang, Jinyang ; Xu, Pinshang ; Li, Zhutao ; Liu, Shuwei ; Zou, Jianwen</creatorcontrib><description>Tropical and subtropical acidic soils have been well documented as hotspots of global soil nitrogen (N) oxide (i.e., nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions). While the effectiveness of possible mitigation options has been extensively examined in croplands, little is known about their effectiveness in reducing N‐oxide emissions from acidic soils of rapidly expanding tea plantations in China. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to investigate how organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment affect soil N‐oxide emissions from a subtropical tea plantation. Across the 2‐year measurement period, full organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer significantly increased N2O emissions by an average of 17% while had a lower NO emission compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Our global meta‐analysis further revealed that full or partial organic fertilizer substitution resulted in a 29% (95% confidence interval: 5%–60%) increase of N2O emissions from acidic soils. In contrast, irrespective of fertilizer type, biochar amendment significantly reduced N2O emissions by 14% in the first but not second experimental year, suggesting a transient effect. The trade‐off effect of full organic substitution on N2O and NO emissions may be attributed to the favorable conditions for N2O production due to the stimulated activity of nitrifiers and denitrifiers. The suppression of N2O emission following biochar amendment was probably due to promoted further reduction of N2O to dinitrogen. The fertilizer‐induced emission factor (EF) of N2O (2.1%) in the tea plantation was greater than the current IPCC default value, but the EF of NO (0.8%) was comparable to the global estimate. Taken together, while biochar amendment could have mitigation potential, cautions are needed when applying organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer as mitigation options for acidic soils as hotspots of N‐oxide emissions.
Tropical and subtropical acidic soils are hotspots of N‐oxide emissions, but less is known about the effectiveness of climate‐smart agricultural practices in mitigating N‐oxide emissions from tea plantations. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to examine the responses of soil N2O and NO emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation. We found that full organic substitution resulted in an increased N2O but lowered NO emissions compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Biochar amendment had a transient effect on N2O mitigation. These findings imply that cautions are needed when applying these practices as mitigation options in subtropical acidic soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-1693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-1707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acidic oxides ; acidic soil ; Acidic soils ; Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Charcoal ; climate‐smart practice ; Confidence intervals ; COVID-19 ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Fertilizers ; hotspots ; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ; Loam soils ; Manures ; mitigation option ; Nitric oxide ; Nitrogen ; Nitrous oxide ; Organic fertilizers ; Plantations ; Soil amendment ; Soils ; Substitutes ; sustainable agriculture ; Tea ; trace gas</subject><ispartof>Global change biology. Bioenergy, 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1260-1274</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-ae7d7aa3122243d95f3ccd70cb3bf4253dd8491ad40e48403eacfd9035259e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-ae7d7aa3122243d95f3ccd70cb3bf4253dd8491ad40e48403eacfd9035259e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0668-336X ; 0000-0003-4689-9237</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550176856/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550176856?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Zhaoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jinyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Pinshang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhutao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Jianwen</creatorcontrib><title>Differential responses of soil nitrogen‐oxide emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation</title><title>Global change biology. Bioenergy</title><description>Tropical and subtropical acidic soils have been well documented as hotspots of global soil nitrogen (N) oxide (i.e., nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions). While the effectiveness of possible mitigation options has been extensively examined in croplands, little is known about their effectiveness in reducing N‐oxide emissions from acidic soils of rapidly expanding tea plantations in China. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to investigate how organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment affect soil N‐oxide emissions from a subtropical tea plantation. Across the 2‐year measurement period, full organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer significantly increased N2O emissions by an average of 17% while had a lower NO emission compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Our global meta‐analysis further revealed that full or partial organic fertilizer substitution resulted in a 29% (95% confidence interval: 5%–60%) increase of N2O emissions from acidic soils. In contrast, irrespective of fertilizer type, biochar amendment significantly reduced N2O emissions by 14% in the first but not second experimental year, suggesting a transient effect. The trade‐off effect of full organic substitution on N2O and NO emissions may be attributed to the favorable conditions for N2O production due to the stimulated activity of nitrifiers and denitrifiers. The suppression of N2O emission following biochar amendment was probably due to promoted further reduction of N2O to dinitrogen. The fertilizer‐induced emission factor (EF) of N2O (2.1%) in the tea plantation was greater than the current IPCC default value, but the EF of NO (0.8%) was comparable to the global estimate. Taken together, while biochar amendment could have mitigation potential, cautions are needed when applying organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer as mitigation options for acidic soils as hotspots of N‐oxide emissions.
Tropical and subtropical acidic soils are hotspots of N‐oxide emissions, but less is known about the effectiveness of climate‐smart agricultural practices in mitigating N‐oxide emissions from tea plantations. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to examine the responses of soil N2O and NO emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation. We found that full organic substitution resulted in an increased N2O but lowered NO emissions compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Biochar amendment had a transient effect on N2O mitigation. These findings imply that cautions are needed when applying these practices as mitigation options in subtropical acidic soils.</description><subject>Acidic oxides</subject><subject>acidic soil</subject><subject>Acidic soils</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>climate‐smart practice</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>hotspots</subject><subject>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>mitigation option</subject><subject>Nitric oxide</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Organic fertilizers</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><subject>sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tea</subject><subject>trace gas</subject><issn>1757-1693</issn><issn>1757-1707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-OFCEQxonRxHX04hOQeDOZlb9N99Eddd1kEy97JzQUs0x6oAUmOp58BB_BZ_NJpLfVoySECvWr76tKIfSSkkvazpu9HcdLynrBHqELqqTaUkXU479xN_Cn6FkpB0I62dHhAv18F7yHDLEGM-EMZU6xQMHJ45LChGOoOe0h_vr-I30NDjAcQymhQbgmnPLexGBxOY2lhnqqLYF9yricY72H2lJNvIYpfIOMTXR4DMnemxYfIbp2Kw4Rm0Wg-czBtiYqGDxPJlazyD1HT7yZCrz4827Q3Yf3d7uP29tP1ze7t7dbKwhnWwPKKWM4ZYwJ7gbpubVOETvy0QsmuXO9GKhxgoDoWwkY691AuGRyAME36GaVdckc9JzD0eSzTiboh482qDZtEDuBHphQdpRNdpSLdw8cHPEKREeEaYYb9GrVmnP6fIJS9SGdcmzdayYloarrZdeo1ytlcyolg__nSolelqmXZeqHZTaYrvCXMMH5P6S-3l1drTW_ARqCpwE</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Han, Zhaoqiang</creator><creator>Wang, Jinyang</creator><creator>Xu, Pinshang</creator><creator>Li, Zhutao</creator><creator>Liu, Shuwei</creator><creator>Zou, Jianwen</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0668-336X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-9237</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Differential responses of soil nitrogen‐oxide emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation</title><author>Han, Zhaoqiang ; Wang, Jinyang ; Xu, Pinshang ; Li, Zhutao ; Liu, Shuwei ; Zou, Jianwen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-ae7d7aa3122243d95f3ccd70cb3bf4253dd8491ad40e48403eacfd9035259e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidic oxides</topic><topic>acidic soil</topic><topic>Acidic soils</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>climate‐smart practice</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>hotspots</topic><topic>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>mitigation option</topic><topic>Nitric oxide</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Organic fertilizers</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><topic>sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tea</topic><topic>trace gas</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Zhaoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jinyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Pinshang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhutao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Jianwen</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>Wiley Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Global change biology. Bioenergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Zhaoqiang</au><au>Wang, Jinyang</au><au>Xu, Pinshang</au><au>Li, Zhutao</au><au>Liu, Shuwei</au><au>Zou, Jianwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential responses of soil nitrogen‐oxide emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology. Bioenergy</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1260</spage><epage>1274</epage><pages>1260-1274</pages><issn>1757-1693</issn><eissn>1757-1707</eissn><abstract>Tropical and subtropical acidic soils have been well documented as hotspots of global soil nitrogen (N) oxide (i.e., nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions). While the effectiveness of possible mitigation options has been extensively examined in croplands, little is known about their effectiveness in reducing N‐oxide emissions from acidic soils of rapidly expanding tea plantations in China. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to investigate how organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment affect soil N‐oxide emissions from a subtropical tea plantation. Across the 2‐year measurement period, full organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer significantly increased N2O emissions by an average of 17% while had a lower NO emission compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Our global meta‐analysis further revealed that full or partial organic fertilizer substitution resulted in a 29% (95% confidence interval: 5%–60%) increase of N2O emissions from acidic soils. In contrast, irrespective of fertilizer type, biochar amendment significantly reduced N2O emissions by 14% in the first but not second experimental year, suggesting a transient effect. The trade‐off effect of full organic substitution on N2O and NO emissions may be attributed to the favorable conditions for N2O production due to the stimulated activity of nitrifiers and denitrifiers. The suppression of N2O emission following biochar amendment was probably due to promoted further reduction of N2O to dinitrogen. The fertilizer‐induced emission factor (EF) of N2O (2.1%) in the tea plantation was greater than the current IPCC default value, but the EF of NO (0.8%) was comparable to the global estimate. Taken together, while biochar amendment could have mitigation potential, cautions are needed when applying organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer as mitigation options for acidic soils as hotspots of N‐oxide emissions.
Tropical and subtropical acidic soils are hotspots of N‐oxide emissions, but less is known about the effectiveness of climate‐smart agricultural practices in mitigating N‐oxide emissions from tea plantations. Here, we conducted a 2‐year field experiment to examine the responses of soil N2O and NO emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation. We found that full organic substitution resulted in an increased N2O but lowered NO emissions compared to synthetic fertilizer alone. Biochar amendment had a transient effect on N2O mitigation. These findings imply that cautions are needed when applying these practices as mitigation options in subtropical acidic soils.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/gcbb.12842</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0668-336X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-9237</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-1693 |
ispartof | Global change biology. Bioenergy, 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1260-1274 |
issn | 1757-1693 1757-1707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9247cb5bf4b540328e3ed0f7e4604acb |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess) |
subjects | Acidic oxides acidic soil Acidic soils Agricultural land Agriculture Agrochemicals Charcoal climate‐smart practice Confidence intervals COVID-19 Emission analysis Emissions Fertilizers hotspots Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Loam soils Manures mitigation option Nitric oxide Nitrogen Nitrous oxide Organic fertilizers Plantations Soil amendment Soils Substitutes sustainable agriculture Tea trace gas |
title | Differential responses of soil nitrogen‐oxide emissions to organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer and biochar amendment in a subtropical tea plantation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20responses%20of%20soil%20nitrogen%E2%80%90oxide%20emissions%20to%20organic%20substitution%20for%20synthetic%20fertilizer%20and%20biochar%20amendment%20in%20a%20subtropical%20tea%20plantation&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology.%20Bioenergy&rft.au=Han,%20Zhaoqiang&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1260&rft.epage=1274&rft.pages=1260-1274&rft.issn=1757-1693&rft.eissn=1757-1707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcbb.12842&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2550176856%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-ae7d7aa3122243d95f3ccd70cb3bf4253dd8491ad40e48403eacfd9035259e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550176856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |