Loading…

Comparison of Two Treatment Methods "One Shot" and "Sequential" on Reduction the Level of Hemoglobin in Patients with Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Al Zahra Hospital in 2012-2013

Background: Access dilation is the most important part of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) that is done by different methods, especially metal telescoping and one shot. In this study, two different methods of access dilation one shot and telescoping were compared. Materials and Methods: In obse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advanced biomedical research 2017-01, Vol.6 (1), p.84-84
Main Authors: Khorrami, Mohammad, Izadpanahi, Mohammad, Mohammadi, Mehrdad, Alizadeh, Farshid, Zargham, Mahtab, Khorrami, Farbod, Isfahani, Felora
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393s-bc9973c2fdb69de56059b70ab5257a3c2929145dab769231e2d901e25d978d13
cites
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 84
container_title Advanced biomedical research
container_volume 6
creator Khorrami, Mohammad
Izadpanahi, Mohammad
Mohammadi, Mehrdad
Alizadeh, Farshid
Zargham, Mahtab
Khorrami, Farbod
Isfahani, Felora
description Background: Access dilation is the most important part of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) that is done by different methods, especially metal telescoping and one shot. In this study, two different methods of access dilation one shot and telescoping were compared. Materials and Methods: In observational cross-sectional study, 240 patients who were a candidate for PCNL were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The first group was undergone one-shot method and the second group was undergone telescoping method. The decrease in hemoglobin (Hb), duration of hospitalization and the time of radiation exposure during access dilation was compared in two groups by SPSS software version 21, (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The decrease of Hb level after intervention in one-shot group was 1.08 ± 1.23 g/dl and in telescoping, group was 1.51 ± 1.08 g/dl with no difference statistically (P = 0.37). The mean duration of hospitalization in one shot and telescoping group were 2.36 ± 0.67 and 2.28 ± 0.61 days, respectively. According to t-test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.37). Average radiation exposure in one shot group was 7.13 s and in telescoping, group was 35.75 s, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: One-shot method is superior to telescoping method due to less time for radiation exposure and no more blood loss and other complications during PCNL.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/2277-9175.210661
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_927e9527ced941b295c7ff008ffa9cdb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_927e9527ced941b295c7ff008ffa9cdb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1994620958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393s-bc9973c2fdb69de56059b70ab5257a3c2929145dab769231e2d901e25d978d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkl1v2yAUhq1p01p1vd_VhLJrd4CNMTeToqhbK2VrteZqNwib45jUMR7gRv1j-33DSxslCMHROe95-NCbJB8JvsoJzr5QynkqCGdXlOCiIG-S80Pq7VF8llx6v8FxFGVeMPE-OaNlicuC4fPk78JuB-WMtz2yDVrtLFo5UGELfUA_ILRWezS76wE9tDbMkOo1mj3AnzHWjepmKPb9Aj3WwcQotICW8ATdxLqBrV13tjI9ivNeBRN7PNqZ0KJ7cPUYVA929OgnDK2zXczb4Mzgnyf9vEO_VesUurF-MEF1U5JiQtO4ZB-Sd43qPFy-7BfJ6tv1anGTLu--3y7my7TORObTqhaCZzVtdFUIDazATFQcq4pRxlUsCCpIzrSqeCFoRoBqgePKtOClJtlFcrvHaqs2cnBmq9yztMrI_wnr1lK5YOoOpKAcBKO8Bi1yUlHBat40GJdNo0Stq8j6umcNY7UFXcfPcKo7gZ5WetPKtX2SjGWiKFgEfH4BOBv_3we5saPr4_MlESIvKBasjCq8V9XOeu-gOZxAsJx8IydjyMkYcu-b2PLp-GaHhleXRMF8L9jZLoDzj924Ayej9rG3uxNwegSWZS5f7ZX9A4-Y070</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1994620958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Methods "One Shot" and "Sequential" on Reduction the Level of Hemoglobin in Patients with Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Al Zahra Hospital in 2012-2013</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Khorrami, Mohammad ; Izadpanahi, Mohammad ; Mohammadi, Mehrdad ; Alizadeh, Farshid ; Zargham, Mahtab ; Khorrami, Farbod ; Isfahani, Felora</creator><creatorcontrib>Khorrami, Mohammad ; Izadpanahi, Mohammad ; Mohammadi, Mehrdad ; Alizadeh, Farshid ; Zargham, Mahtab ; Khorrami, Farbod ; Isfahani, Felora</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Access dilation is the most important part of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) that is done by different methods, especially metal telescoping and one shot. In this study, two different methods of access dilation one shot and telescoping were compared. Materials and Methods: In observational cross-sectional study, 240 patients who were a candidate for PCNL were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The first group was undergone one-shot method and the second group was undergone telescoping method. The decrease in hemoglobin (Hb), duration of hospitalization and the time of radiation exposure during access dilation was compared in two groups by SPSS software version 21, (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The decrease of Hb level after intervention in one-shot group was 1.08 ± 1.23 g/dl and in telescoping, group was 1.51 ± 1.08 g/dl with no difference statistically (P = 0.37). The mean duration of hospitalization in one shot and telescoping group were 2.36 ± 0.67 and 2.28 ± 0.61 days, respectively. According to t-test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.37). Average radiation exposure in one shot group was 7.13 s and in telescoping, group was 35.75 s, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: One-shot method is superior to telescoping method due to less time for radiation exposure and no more blood loss and other complications during PCNL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2277-9175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2277-9175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.210661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28808650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Dilation ; Exposure ; Hemoglobin ; Joint surgery ; Kidney stones ; Lithotripsy ; Metal telescoping ; Methods ; one shot ; Original ; Patients ; percutaneous nephrolithotripsy ; Radiation effects ; Surgery ; Telescoping ; Urinary tract infections ; Urogenital system ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Advanced biomedical research, 2017-01, Vol.6 (1), p.84-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Advanced Biomedical Research 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393s-bc9973c2fdb69de56059b70ab5257a3c2929145dab769231e2d901e25d978d13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539665/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1994620958?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khorrami, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izadpanahi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alizadeh, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zargham, Mahtab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorrami, Farbod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isfahani, Felora</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Methods "One Shot" and "Sequential" on Reduction the Level of Hemoglobin in Patients with Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Al Zahra Hospital in 2012-2013</title><title>Advanced biomedical research</title><addtitle>Adv Biomed Res</addtitle><description>Background: Access dilation is the most important part of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) that is done by different methods, especially metal telescoping and one shot. In this study, two different methods of access dilation one shot and telescoping were compared. Materials and Methods: In observational cross-sectional study, 240 patients who were a candidate for PCNL were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The first group was undergone one-shot method and the second group was undergone telescoping method. The decrease in hemoglobin (Hb), duration of hospitalization and the time of radiation exposure during access dilation was compared in two groups by SPSS software version 21, (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The decrease of Hb level after intervention in one-shot group was 1.08 ± 1.23 g/dl and in telescoping, group was 1.51 ± 1.08 g/dl with no difference statistically (P = 0.37). The mean duration of hospitalization in one shot and telescoping group were 2.36 ± 0.67 and 2.28 ± 0.61 days, respectively. According to t-test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.37). Average radiation exposure in one shot group was 7.13 s and in telescoping, group was 35.75 s, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: One-shot method is superior to telescoping method due to less time for radiation exposure and no more blood loss and other complications during PCNL.</description><subject>Dilation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Metal telescoping</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>one shot</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>percutaneous nephrolithotripsy</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Telescoping</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2277-9175</issn><issn>2277-9175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkl1v2yAUhq1p01p1vd_VhLJrd4CNMTeToqhbK2VrteZqNwib45jUMR7gRv1j-33DSxslCMHROe95-NCbJB8JvsoJzr5QynkqCGdXlOCiIG-S80Pq7VF8llx6v8FxFGVeMPE-OaNlicuC4fPk78JuB-WMtz2yDVrtLFo5UGELfUA_ILRWezS76wE9tDbMkOo1mj3AnzHWjepmKPb9Aj3WwcQotICW8ATdxLqBrV13tjI9ivNeBRN7PNqZ0KJ7cPUYVA929OgnDK2zXczb4Mzgnyf9vEO_VesUurF-MEF1U5JiQtO4ZB-Sd43qPFy-7BfJ6tv1anGTLu--3y7my7TORObTqhaCZzVtdFUIDazATFQcq4pRxlUsCCpIzrSqeCFoRoBqgePKtOClJtlFcrvHaqs2cnBmq9yztMrI_wnr1lK5YOoOpKAcBKO8Bi1yUlHBat40GJdNo0Stq8j6umcNY7UFXcfPcKo7gZ5WetPKtX2SjGWiKFgEfH4BOBv_3we5saPr4_MlESIvKBasjCq8V9XOeu-gOZxAsJx8IydjyMkYcu-b2PLp-GaHhleXRMF8L9jZLoDzj924Ayej9rG3uxNwegSWZS5f7ZX9A4-Y070</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Khorrami, Mohammad</creator><creator>Izadpanahi, Mohammad</creator><creator>Mohammadi, Mehrdad</creator><creator>Alizadeh, Farshid</creator><creator>Zargham, Mahtab</creator><creator>Khorrami, Farbod</creator><creator>Isfahani, Felora</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Methods "One Shot" and "Sequential" on Reduction the Level of Hemoglobin in Patients with Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Al Zahra Hospital in 2012-2013</title><author>Khorrami, Mohammad ; Izadpanahi, Mohammad ; Mohammadi, Mehrdad ; Alizadeh, Farshid ; Zargham, Mahtab ; Khorrami, Farbod ; Isfahani, Felora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393s-bc9973c2fdb69de56059b70ab5257a3c2929145dab769231e2d901e25d978d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Dilation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Metal telescoping</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>one shot</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>percutaneous nephrolithotripsy</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Telescoping</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khorrami, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izadpanahi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alizadeh, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zargham, Mahtab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorrami, Farbod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isfahani, Felora</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</collection><jtitle>Advanced biomedical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khorrami, Mohammad</au><au>Izadpanahi, Mohammad</au><au>Mohammadi, Mehrdad</au><au>Alizadeh, Farshid</au><au>Zargham, Mahtab</au><au>Khorrami, Farbod</au><au>Isfahani, Felora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Treatment Methods "One Shot" and "Sequential" on Reduction the Level of Hemoglobin in Patients with Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Al Zahra Hospital in 2012-2013</atitle><jtitle>Advanced biomedical research</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Biomed Res</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>84-84</pages><issn>2277-9175</issn><eissn>2277-9175</eissn><abstract>Background: Access dilation is the most important part of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) that is done by different methods, especially metal telescoping and one shot. In this study, two different methods of access dilation one shot and telescoping were compared. Materials and Methods: In observational cross-sectional study, 240 patients who were a candidate for PCNL were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The first group was undergone one-shot method and the second group was undergone telescoping method. The decrease in hemoglobin (Hb), duration of hospitalization and the time of radiation exposure during access dilation was compared in two groups by SPSS software version 21, (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The decrease of Hb level after intervention in one-shot group was 1.08 ± 1.23 g/dl and in telescoping, group was 1.51 ± 1.08 g/dl with no difference statistically (P = 0.37). The mean duration of hospitalization in one shot and telescoping group were 2.36 ± 0.67 and 2.28 ± 0.61 days, respectively. According to t-test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.37). Average radiation exposure in one shot group was 7.13 s and in telescoping, group was 35.75 s, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: One-shot method is superior to telescoping method due to less time for radiation exposure and no more blood loss and other complications during PCNL.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>28808650</pmid><doi>10.4103/2277-9175.210661</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2277-9175
ispartof Advanced biomedical research, 2017-01, Vol.6 (1), p.84-84
issn 2277-9175
2277-9175
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_927e9527ced941b295c7ff008ffa9cdb
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Dilation
Exposure
Hemoglobin
Joint surgery
Kidney stones
Lithotripsy
Metal telescoping
Methods
one shot
Original
Patients
percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
Radiation effects
Surgery
Telescoping
Urinary tract infections
Urogenital system
Urology
title Comparison of Two Treatment Methods "One Shot" and "Sequential" on Reduction the Level of Hemoglobin in Patients with Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Al Zahra Hospital in 2012-2013
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A46%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Treatment%20Methods%20%22One%20Shot%22%20and%20%22Sequential%22%20on%20Reduction%20the%20Level%20of%20Hemoglobin%20in%20Patients%20with%20Percutaneous%20Nephrolithotripsy%20in%20Al%20Zahra%20Hospital%20in%202012-2013&rft.jtitle=Advanced%20biomedical%20research&rft.au=Khorrami,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=84-84&rft.issn=2277-9175&rft.eissn=2277-9175&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2277-9175.210661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1994620958%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393s-bc9973c2fdb69de56059b70ab5257a3c2929145dab769231e2d901e25d978d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1994620958&rft_id=info:pmid/28808650&rfr_iscdi=true