A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Consent for Genetic Testing Using an Oncologist- or Genetic Counselor-Mediated Model of Care

• Published in: Current oncology (Toronto) 2021-04, Vol.28 (2), p.1459-1471
• Main Authors: McCuaig, Jeanna M, Thain, Emily, Malcolmson, Janet, Keshavarzi, Sareh, Armel, Susan Randall, Kim, Raymond H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: breast cancer; genetic counseling; genetic testing; hereditary cancer; mainstreaming; service delivery model
• ISSN: 1718-7729; 1198-0052; 1718-7729
• DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020138

This study compares knowledge, experience and understanding of genetic testing, and psychological outcomes among breast and ovarian cancer patients undergoing multi-gene panel testing via genetic counselor-mediated (GMT) or oncologist-mediated (OMT) testing models. A pragmatic, prospective survey of breast and ovarian cancer patients pursuing genetic testing between January 2017 and August 2019 was conducted at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada. A total of 120 (80 GMT; 40 OMT) individuals completed a survey administered one week following consent to genetic testing. Compared to OMT, the GMT cohort had higher median knowledge (8 vs. 9; = 0.025) and experience/understanding scores (8.5 vs. 10; < 0.001) at the time of genetic testing. Significant differences were noted in the potential psychological concerns experienced, with individuals in the GMT cohort more likely to screen positive in the hereditary predisposition domain of the Psychosocial Aspects of Hereditary Cancer tool (55% vs. 27.5%; = 0.005), and individuals in the OMT cohort more likely to screen positive in the general emotions domain (65.0% vs. 38.8%; = 0.007). The results of this study suggest that OMT can be implemented to streamline genetic testing; however, post-test genetic counseling should remain available to all individuals undergoing genetic testing, to ensure any psychologic concerns are addressed and that individuals have a clear understanding of relevant implications and limitations of their test results.