Fragility fracture systems, Latin America perspective

• Published in: OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma 2022-06, Vol.5 (3S), p.e178-e178
• Main Authors: Rojas, Luis G. Padilla, Cervantes, Roberto E. López, Almejo, Leonardo López, Pesciallo, Cesar A., Garabano, Germán, Bidolegui, Fernando, Giordano, Vincenzo, Belangero, William Dias, Hungria, José Octavio Soares, Triana Q, Miguel Alvaro, Gómez, Amparo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Standard Review
• ISSN: 2574-2167; 2574-2167
• DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000178

Osteoporosis is a worldwide epidemic, affecting an average of 30% to 50% of those over 50 years of age in Latin America. Resulting from it is another epidemic, that of fragility fractures, which adversely affects morbidity and mortality of this population. Increasing in their incidence, fragility fractures are expected to occur in 1 in 3 women and 1 in 5 men over 50years of age during their lifetimes. Currently, there are diagnostic and management guidelines for fragility fractures in Latin American countries, especially those for hip and spine fractures. In general, in Latin America, the quality indicators and standards for the care of these fractures vary greatly according to the health system, being suboptimal in many situations. The organization of health services is different in the different countries throughout Latin America. Common underlying characteristics, however, include the distinctions that exist in care between public and private medicine and the lack of economic resources directed to public healthcare systems from the national levels. Several important changes have been implemented in recent years, with the collaboration between national organizations and international associations such as the Fragility Fracture Network and the International Osteoporosis Foundation, aimed at improving quality standards in care and rates of morbidity and mortality in patients treated thorough fragility fracture programs. The underregistration in these programs and absence of formal national registries also contribute to a lack of recognition of the size, scope, and severity of the problem.