Loading…
Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study
The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice. The Global Survey questionna...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of women's health 2019-03, Vol.11, p.153-159 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 159 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | International journal of women's health |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Zimmermann, Yaël Viviano, Manuela Yaron, Michal |
description | The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice.
The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception.
A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women.
The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2147/IJWH.S189051 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9321088286e943f2961a8aabaef78a0a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A619403166</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9321088286e943f2961a8aabaef78a0a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A619403166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkkFv0zAYhiMEYlPZjTOyhAQcaIljJ3E4IE0TsKJJHAbiaDnOl9SVY2d23Kk_hP-L03ajRdgH21_e77H85k2SlzhdZJiWH5bffl0vbjGr0hw_Sc4xLqs5phg_PdqfJRfer9M4CIk19jw5IyljGFN6nvy-vVfeo25rQFptO-VH_xbZQRlljUfCNGgAJ2EYd2dpjQRnlOnQuAIUPCDbImVGJ8IIThlADWyUBI_qLTJBazUIZ8Oe1Ac9PpzvbQ_mYywja_TU54PbwBb5MTTbF8mzVmgPF4d1lvz88vnH1fX85vvX5dXlzVzmhI1zkreFYA1J2yJnJSmAlmWOpagJrttaVpQSkje4oThraikL2aRQYsrKNk8FIRmZJcs9t7FizQeneuG23ArFdwXrOi7cqKQGXpEMR9cyVkBFSZtVBRZMiFpAWzIRcbPk0541hLqHRsJkij6Bnn4xasU7u-EFTVmV0Qh4dwA4exfAj7xXXoLWwkB0jGe4IgWuWFpG6et_pGsbnIlW8SzLGCsprchfVSfiA5RpbbxXTlB-GUE0JbgoomrxH1WcDfQq_m9oVayfNLw5aliB0OPKWx12CTkVvt8LpbPeO2gfzcApn-LLp_jyQ3yj_NWxgY_ih7CSPyOg6-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2228874493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Zimmermann, Yaël ; Viviano, Manuela ; Yaron, Michal</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Yaël ; Viviano, Manuela ; Yaron, Michal</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice.
The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception.
A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women.
The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1179-1411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S189051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30881144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Attitudes ; Birth control ; Contraception ; Diseases ; Ectopic pregnancy ; Epidemiology ; Family planning ; gynaecologists ; Gynecology ; Health care ; Health education ; Infertility ; intra-uterine device ; Intrauterine devices ; IUD ; Medical personnel training ; Methods ; multiparous ; nulliparous ; Obstetrics ; Original Research ; Pelvic inflammatory disease ; Physicians ; Public opinion ; Questionnaires ; Surveys ; Swiss ; Switzerland ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>International journal of women's health, 2019-03, Vol.11, p.153-159</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Zimmermann et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2228874493/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2228874493?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Yaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viviano, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaron, Michal</creatorcontrib><title>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</title><title>International journal of women's health</title><addtitle>Int J Womens Health</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice.
The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception.
A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women.
The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Ectopic pregnancy</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>gynaecologists</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>intra-uterine device</subject><subject>Intrauterine devices</subject><subject>IUD</subject><subject>Medical personnel training</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>multiparous</subject><subject>nulliparous</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pelvic inflammatory disease</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Swiss</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1179-1411</issn><issn>1179-1411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkkFv0zAYhiMEYlPZjTOyhAQcaIljJ3E4IE0TsKJJHAbiaDnOl9SVY2d23Kk_hP-L03ajRdgH21_e77H85k2SlzhdZJiWH5bffl0vbjGr0hw_Sc4xLqs5phg_PdqfJRfer9M4CIk19jw5IyljGFN6nvy-vVfeo25rQFptO-VH_xbZQRlljUfCNGgAJ2EYd2dpjQRnlOnQuAIUPCDbImVGJ8IIThlADWyUBI_qLTJBazUIZ8Oe1Ac9PpzvbQ_mYywja_TU54PbwBb5MTTbF8mzVmgPF4d1lvz88vnH1fX85vvX5dXlzVzmhI1zkreFYA1J2yJnJSmAlmWOpagJrttaVpQSkje4oThraikL2aRQYsrKNk8FIRmZJcs9t7FizQeneuG23ArFdwXrOi7cqKQGXpEMR9cyVkBFSZtVBRZMiFpAWzIRcbPk0541hLqHRsJkij6Bnn4xasU7u-EFTVmV0Qh4dwA4exfAj7xXXoLWwkB0jGe4IgWuWFpG6et_pGsbnIlW8SzLGCsprchfVSfiA5RpbbxXTlB-GUE0JbgoomrxH1WcDfQq_m9oVayfNLw5aliB0OPKWx12CTkVvt8LpbPeO2gfzcApn-LLp_jyQ3yj_NWxgY_ih7CSPyOg6-E</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Zimmermann, Yaël</creator><creator>Viviano, Manuela</creator><creator>Yaron, Michal</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</title><author>Zimmermann, Yaël ; Viviano, Manuela ; Yaron, Michal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Ectopic pregnancy</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>gynaecologists</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>intra-uterine device</topic><topic>Intrauterine devices</topic><topic>IUD</topic><topic>Medical personnel training</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>multiparous</topic><topic>nulliparous</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pelvic inflammatory disease</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Swiss</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Yaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viviano, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaron, Michal</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmermann, Yaël</au><au>Viviano, Manuela</au><au>Yaron, Michal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of women's health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Womens Health</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>153</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>153-159</pages><issn>1179-1411</issn><eissn>1179-1411</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice.
The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception.
A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women.
The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>30881144</pmid><doi>10.2147/IJWH.S189051</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1179-1411 |
ispartof | International journal of women's health, 2019-03, Vol.11, p.153-159 |
issn | 1179-1411 1179-1411 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9321088286e943f2961a8aabaef78a0a |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Abortion Attitudes Birth control Contraception Diseases Ectopic pregnancy Epidemiology Family planning gynaecologists Gynecology Health care Health education Infertility intra-uterine device Intrauterine devices IUD Medical personnel training Methods multiparous nulliparous Obstetrics Original Research Pelvic inflammatory disease Physicians Public opinion Questionnaires Surveys Swiss Switzerland Women Womens health |
title | Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A31%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Swiss%20gynecologists'%20opinions%20and%20perceptions%20concerning%20the%20use%20of%20intrauterine%20devices%20by%20nulliparous%20and%20multiparous%20women:%20an%20online%20survey%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20women's%20health&rft.au=Zimmermann,%20Ya%C3%ABl&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=153-159&rft.issn=1179-1411&rft.eissn=1179-1411&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/IJWH.S189051&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA619403166%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2228874493&rft_id=info:pmid/30881144&rft_galeid=A619403166&rfr_iscdi=true |