Loading…

Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study

The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice. The Global Survey questionna...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of women's health 2019-03, Vol.11, p.153-159
Main Authors: Zimmermann, Yaël, Viviano, Manuela, Yaron, Michal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323
cites
container_end_page 159
container_issue
container_start_page 153
container_title International journal of women's health
container_volume 11
creator Zimmermann, Yaël
Viviano, Manuela
Yaron, Michal
description The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice. The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception. A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women. The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/IJWH.S189051
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9321088286e943f2961a8aabaef78a0a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A619403166</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9321088286e943f2961a8aabaef78a0a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A619403166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkkFv0zAYhiMEYlPZjTOyhAQcaIljJ3E4IE0TsKJJHAbiaDnOl9SVY2d23Kk_hP-L03ajRdgH21_e77H85k2SlzhdZJiWH5bffl0vbjGr0hw_Sc4xLqs5phg_PdqfJRfer9M4CIk19jw5IyljGFN6nvy-vVfeo25rQFptO-VH_xbZQRlljUfCNGgAJ2EYd2dpjQRnlOnQuAIUPCDbImVGJ8IIThlADWyUBI_qLTJBazUIZ8Oe1Ac9PpzvbQ_mYywja_TU54PbwBb5MTTbF8mzVmgPF4d1lvz88vnH1fX85vvX5dXlzVzmhI1zkreFYA1J2yJnJSmAlmWOpagJrttaVpQSkje4oThraikL2aRQYsrKNk8FIRmZJcs9t7FizQeneuG23ArFdwXrOi7cqKQGXpEMR9cyVkBFSZtVBRZMiFpAWzIRcbPk0541hLqHRsJkij6Bnn4xasU7u-EFTVmV0Qh4dwA4exfAj7xXXoLWwkB0jGe4IgWuWFpG6et_pGsbnIlW8SzLGCsprchfVSfiA5RpbbxXTlB-GUE0JbgoomrxH1WcDfQq_m9oVayfNLw5aliB0OPKWx12CTkVvt8LpbPeO2gfzcApn-LLp_jyQ3yj_NWxgY_ih7CSPyOg6-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2228874493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Zimmermann, Yaël ; Viviano, Manuela ; Yaron, Michal</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Yaël ; Viviano, Manuela ; Yaron, Michal</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice. The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception. A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women. The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1179-1411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S189051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30881144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Attitudes ; Birth control ; Contraception ; Diseases ; Ectopic pregnancy ; Epidemiology ; Family planning ; gynaecologists ; Gynecology ; Health care ; Health education ; Infertility ; intra-uterine device ; Intrauterine devices ; IUD ; Medical personnel training ; Methods ; multiparous ; nulliparous ; Obstetrics ; Original Research ; Pelvic inflammatory disease ; Physicians ; Public opinion ; Questionnaires ; Surveys ; Swiss ; Switzerland ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>International journal of women's health, 2019-03, Vol.11, p.153-159</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Zimmermann et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2228874493/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2228874493?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Yaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viviano, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaron, Michal</creatorcontrib><title>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</title><title>International journal of women's health</title><addtitle>Int J Womens Health</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice. The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception. A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women. The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Ectopic pregnancy</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>gynaecologists</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>intra-uterine device</subject><subject>Intrauterine devices</subject><subject>IUD</subject><subject>Medical personnel training</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>multiparous</subject><subject>nulliparous</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pelvic inflammatory disease</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Swiss</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1179-1411</issn><issn>1179-1411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkkFv0zAYhiMEYlPZjTOyhAQcaIljJ3E4IE0TsKJJHAbiaDnOl9SVY2d23Kk_hP-L03ajRdgH21_e77H85k2SlzhdZJiWH5bffl0vbjGr0hw_Sc4xLqs5phg_PdqfJRfer9M4CIk19jw5IyljGFN6nvy-vVfeo25rQFptO-VH_xbZQRlljUfCNGgAJ2EYd2dpjQRnlOnQuAIUPCDbImVGJ8IIThlADWyUBI_qLTJBazUIZ8Oe1Ac9PpzvbQ_mYywja_TU54PbwBb5MTTbF8mzVmgPF4d1lvz88vnH1fX85vvX5dXlzVzmhI1zkreFYA1J2yJnJSmAlmWOpagJrttaVpQSkje4oThraikL2aRQYsrKNk8FIRmZJcs9t7FizQeneuG23ArFdwXrOi7cqKQGXpEMR9cyVkBFSZtVBRZMiFpAWzIRcbPk0541hLqHRsJkij6Bnn4xasU7u-EFTVmV0Qh4dwA4exfAj7xXXoLWwkB0jGe4IgWuWFpG6et_pGsbnIlW8SzLGCsprchfVSfiA5RpbbxXTlB-GUE0JbgoomrxH1WcDfQq_m9oVayfNLw5aliB0OPKWx12CTkVvt8LpbPeO2gfzcApn-LLp_jyQ3yj_NWxgY_ih7CSPyOg6-E</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Zimmermann, Yaël</creator><creator>Viviano, Manuela</creator><creator>Yaron, Michal</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</title><author>Zimmermann, Yaël ; Viviano, Manuela ; Yaron, Michal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Ectopic pregnancy</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>gynaecologists</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>intra-uterine device</topic><topic>Intrauterine devices</topic><topic>IUD</topic><topic>Medical personnel training</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>multiparous</topic><topic>nulliparous</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pelvic inflammatory disease</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Swiss</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Yaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viviano, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaron, Michal</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmermann, Yaël</au><au>Viviano, Manuela</au><au>Yaron, Michal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of women's health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Womens Health</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>153</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>153-159</pages><issn>1179-1411</issn><eissn>1179-1411</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the Swiss physicians' attitudes and beliefs on intrauterine device (IUD) use in multiparous and nulliparous women and 2) determine whether the woman's parity was a factor influencing the gynecologists' IUD practice. The Global Survey questionnaire investigating IUD use was modified and adapted to the Swiss guidelines. A link to the online questionnaire was sent to gynecologists practicing in the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland. We defined IUD use as frequent whenever it was prescribed by gynecologists for 25% or more out of all women consulting for contraception. A total of 299/1,696 gynecologists completed the online questionnaire (17.6%). Frequent IUD prescription was found in 72.9% of multiparous and in 11.8% of nulliparous women. The most frequently reported barriers to IUD use in nulliparous women were as follows: concern over a painful insertion, difficulty of insertion, higher risk of perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, changes in bleeding pattern, high cost, and risk of extrauterine pregnancy. The presence of such perceived obstacles was associated with less frequent IUD insertion in nulliparous women. The results of this study provide a valuable insight into the attitudes and opinions of Switzerland's gynecologists on the use of IUDs in nulliparous and multiparous women, showing that the women's parity is a factor influencing the physicians' attitudes and opinions. Further health education might help minimize the physicians' attitude discrepancies in IUD prescription to nulliparous and multiparous women.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>30881144</pmid><doi>10.2147/IJWH.S189051</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1179-1411
ispartof International journal of women's health, 2019-03, Vol.11, p.153-159
issn 1179-1411
1179-1411
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9321088286e943f2961a8aabaef78a0a
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Abortion
Attitudes
Birth control
Contraception
Diseases
Ectopic pregnancy
Epidemiology
Family planning
gynaecologists
Gynecology
Health care
Health education
Infertility
intra-uterine device
Intrauterine devices
IUD
Medical personnel training
Methods
multiparous
nulliparous
Obstetrics
Original Research
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Physicians
Public opinion
Questionnaires
Surveys
Swiss
Switzerland
Women
Womens health
title Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A31%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Swiss%20gynecologists'%20opinions%20and%20perceptions%20concerning%20the%20use%20of%20intrauterine%20devices%20by%20nulliparous%20and%20multiparous%20women:%20an%20online%20survey%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20women's%20health&rft.au=Zimmermann,%20Ya%C3%ABl&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=153-159&rft.issn=1179-1411&rft.eissn=1179-1411&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/IJWH.S189051&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA619403166%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-35f6a8d30f658736e47751cab31bfbc944335d1d412dbcc6cd0e71487f50a3323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2228874493&rft_id=info:pmid/30881144&rft_galeid=A619403166&rfr_iscdi=true