Diagnostic Imaging Performance of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Uterine Cervical Cancer

• Published in: The Indian journal of radiology & imaging 2024-10, Vol.34 (4), p.661-669
• Main Authors: Shibuki, Saki, Saida, Tsukasa, Mori, Kensaku, Ishiguro, Toshitaka, Amano, Taishi, Yoshida, Miki, Miyata, Mariko, Satoh, Toyomi, Nakajima, Takahito
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: cervical cancer; diagnosis; dual-energy CT; MRI; Original; Original Article
• ISSN: 0971-3026; 1998-3808
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787780

Abstract Objective  This article evaluates the ability of low-energy (40 keV) virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) in the local diagnosis of cervical cancer compared with that of conventional computed tomography (C-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using clinicopathologic staging as a reference. Methods  This prospective study included 33 patients with pathologically confirmed cervical cancer who underwent dual-energy CT and MRI between 2021 and 2022. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the tumor-to-myometrium was compared between C-CT and VMI. Additionally, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each local diagnostic parameter were compared between C-CT, VMI, and MRI. Interradiologist agreement was also assessed. Results  The mean CNR was significantly higher on VMI ( p  = 0.002). No significant difference in AUC was found between C-CT and VMI for all local diagnostic parameters, and the specificity of VMI was often significantly less than that of MRI. For parametrial invasion, mean sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for C-CT, VMI, and MRI were 0.81, 0.99, 0.93; 0.64, 0.35, 0.79; and 0.73, 0.67, 0.86, respectively, and MRI had significantly higher specificity and AUC than that of VMI ( p  = 0.013 and 0.008, respectively). Interradiologist agreement was higher for VMI than C-CT and for MRI than VMI. Conclusion  The CNR of VMI was significantly higher than C-CT and interradiologist agreement was better than with C-CT; however, the overall diagnostic performance of VMI did not significantly differ from C-CT and was inferior to MRI. VMI was characterized by low specificity, which should be understood and used for reading.