The global significance of Scleractinian corals without photoendosymbiosis

• Published in: Scientific reports 2024-05, Vol.14 (1), p.10161-22, Article 10161
• Main Authors: Vuleta, S., Nakagawa, S., Ainsworth, T. D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 631/158/670; 704/829/826; Animals; Anthozoa - physiology; Anthropogenic factors; Biodiversity; Climate Change; Coral Reefs; Corals; Deep water; Ecosystem; Homeostasis; Humanities and Social Sciences; Life history; Marine ecosystems; multidisciplinary; Photosynthesis; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Species; Symbiosis - physiology; Terminology
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60794-0

Globally tropical Scleractinian corals have been a focal point for discussions on the impact of a changing climate on marine ecosystems and biodiversity. Research into tropical Scleractinian corals, particularly the role and breakdown of photoendosymbiosis in response to warming, has been prolific in recent decades. However, research into their subtropical, temperate, cold- and deep-water counterparts, whose number is dominated by corals without photoendosymbiosis, has not been as prolific. Approximately 50% of Scleractinian corals (> 700 species) do not maintain photoendosymbiosis and as such, do not rely upon the products of photosynthesis for homeostasis. Some species also have variable partnerships with photendosymbionts depending on life history and ecological niche. Here we undertake a systematic map of literature on Scleractinian corals without, or with variable, photoendosymbiosis. In doing so we identify 482 publications spanning 5 decades. In mapping research effort, we find publications have been sporadic over time, predominately focusing on a limited number of species, with greater research effort directed towards deep-water species. We find only 141 species have been studied, with approximately 30% of the total identified research effort directed toward a single species, Desmophyllum pertusum , highlighting significant knowledge gaps into Scleractinian diversity. We find similar limitations to studied locations, with 78 identified from the global data, of which only few represent most research outputs. We also identified inconsistencies with terminology used to describe Scleractinia without photoendosymbiosis, likely contributing to difficulties in accounting for their role and contribution to marine ecosystems. We propose that the terminology requires re-evaluation to allow further systematic assessment of literature, and to ensure it’s consistent with changes implemented for photoendosymbiotic corals. Finally, we find that knowledge gaps identified over 20 years ago are still present for most aphotoendosymbiotic Scleractinian species, and we show data deficiencies remain regarding their function, biodiversity and the impacts of anthropogenic stressors.