Loading…
Are There Higher Electron Densities in Narrow Emission Line Regions of Type-1 AGNs than in Type-2 AGNs?
In the manuscript, we check properties of electron densities n e traced by flux ratio R sii of [S ii ] λ 6716 Å to [S ii ] λ 6731 Å in narrow emission line regions (NLRs) between Type-1 active galactic nucleus (AGN) and Type-2 AGN in SDSS Data Release 12 (DR12). Under the framework of unified model...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Astrophysical journal 2024-01, Vol.960 (2), p.108 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In the manuscript, we check properties of electron densities
n
e
traced by flux ratio
R
sii
of [S
ii
]
λ
6716 Å to [S
ii
]
λ
6731 Å in narrow emission line regions (NLRs) between Type-1 active galactic nucleus (AGN) and Type-2 AGN in SDSS Data Release 12 (DR12). Under the framework of unified model considering kiloparsec-scale structures, similar
n
e
in NLRs should be expected between Type-1 AGN and Type-2 AGN. Based on reliable measurements of the [S
ii
] doublet with measured parameters at least 5 times larger than corresponding uncertainties, there are 6039 Type-1 AGN and 8725 Type-2 AGN (excluding the Type-2 LINERs and the composite galaxies) collected from SDSS DR12. Then, lower
R
sii
(higher
n
e
) in NLRs can be well confirmed in Type-1 AGN than in Type-2 AGN, with the confidence level higher than 5
σ
, even after considering the necessary effects including effects of electron temperatures traced by [O
iii
]
λ
4364,4959,5007 Å on estimating
n
e
in NLRs. Two probable methods are proposed to explain the higher
n
e
in NLRs in Type-1 AGN. First, the higher
n
e
in NLRs of Type-1 AGN could indicate longer time durations of AGN activities in Type-1 AGN than in Type-2 AGN, if AGN activities triggering galactic-scale outflows leading to more electrons injecting into NLRs were accepted to explain the higher
n
e
in NLRs of Type-2 AGN than H
ii
galaxies. Second, the lower
n
e
in NLRs of Type-2 AGN could be explained by stronger star-forming contributions in Type-2 AGN, considering lower
n
e
in H
ii
regions. The results provide interesting challenges to the commonly and widely accepted unified model of AGN. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
DOI: | 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029a |