Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention

• Published in: Scientific reports 2021-06, Vol.11 (1), p.12244-12244, Article 12244
• Main Authors: Broccatelli, Chiara, Wang, Peng, McDaid, Lisa, McCann, Mark, Simpson, Sharon Anne, Elliott, Lawrie, Moore, Laurence, Mitchell, Kirstin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 692/308; 692/308/174; 692/308/2779; 692/308/2779/777; Adolescent; Demography; Early Intervention, Educational; Feasibility studies; Female; Friends; Health promotion; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Intervention; Male; Models, Theoretical; multidisciplinary; Opinion leaders; Peer Group; Schools; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sexual Health; Social Networking; Social networks; Social organization; Social Support; Students
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90852-w

There is growing interest in social network-based programmes to improve health, but rigorous methods using Social Network research to evaluate the process of these interventions is less well developed. Using data from the “STis And Sexual Health” (STASH) feasibility trial of a school-based, peer-led intervention on sexual health prevention, we illustrate how network data analysis results can address key components of process evaluations for complex interventions— implementation , mechanisms of impacts , and context. STASH trained students as Peer Supporters (PS) to diffuse sexual health messages though face-to-face interactions and online Facebook (FB) groups. We applied a Multilevel Exponential Random Graph modelling approach to analyse the interdependence between offline friendship relationships and online FB ties and how these different relationships align. Our results suggest that the creation of online FB communities mirrored offline adolescent groups, demonstrating fidelity of intervention delivery. Data on informal friendship networks related to student’s individual characteristics (i.e., demographics, sexual health knowledge and adherence to norms, which were included for STASH), contributed to an understanding of the social relational ‘building’ mechanisms that sustain tie-formation. This knowledge could assist the selection of opinion leaders, improving identification of influential peers situated in optimal network positions. This work provides a novel contribution to understanding how to integrate network research with the process evaluation of a network intervention.