Loading…
Quantitative examination of factors influencing the colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics
Effects of ceramic translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour on the shade of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations proved to be significant in several studies, however, quantitative, numerical results on the relationship between the colour difference and these parameters are still...
Saved in:
| Published in: | BMC oral health 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.660-11, Article 660 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430w-4b68f622ec046e870c608504e63d73d17ceb52db566b5a0628bec22f7a05787f3 |
| container_end_page | 11 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 660 |
| container_title | BMC oral health |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Saláta, József Szabó, Ferenc Csuti, Péter Antal, Melinda Márton, Péter Hermann, Péter Borbély, Judit Ábrám, Emese |
| description | Effects of ceramic translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour on the shade of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations proved to be significant in several studies, however, quantitative, numerical results on the relationship between the colour difference and these parameters are still lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantitatively determine how the colour reproduction ability of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic is affected by its translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour.
Ceramic samples were prepared from A2 shade IPS e.max CAD blocks with high and low translucencies (HT and LT) in a thickness range of 0.5-2.5 mm (+/- 0.05 mm). Layered samples were acquired utilizing composite substrates in 9 shades; transparent try-in paste was used. The spectral reflectance of the specimens was assessed under D65 standard illumination with a Konica Minolta CM-3720d spectrophotometer. The CIEDE2000 colour difference (ΔE
) between two samples was analysed using perceptibility and acceptability thresholds set at 50:50%. Statistical analysis involved linear regression analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
An increase in the thickness of 0.5 mm reduced the ΔE
of the HT samples to 72.8%, and that of the T samples to 71.1% (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12903-024-04429-w |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9461093056dd4531a2ba4b76b9ae213e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A796585019</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9461093056dd4531a2ba4b76b9ae213e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A796585019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430w-4b68f622ec046e870c608504e63d73d17ceb52db566b5a0628bec22f7a05787f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIlsIf4IAiceGS4m87J1RVtFSqhJDgbDnOS9arxF5sp0v_Pd7dUroI-fCs55mx3rypqrcYnWOsxMeESYtogwhrEGOkbbbPqlPMJGmEovj5k_tJ9SqlNUJYKsZeVidUKYYwxqdV_rYYn1022d1BDb_M7Hy5B1-HoR6MzSGm2vlhWsBb58c6r6C2YQpLrCNsYugXu4ebzk0u3-9opa7cMte9S6VnTYZ6nExKjYVY9G16Xb0YzJTgzUM9q35cff5--aW5_Xp9c3lx21hG0bZhnVCDIAQsYgKURFYgxREDQXtJeywtdJz0HRei4wYJojqwhAzSIC6VHOhZdXPQ7YNZ6010s4n3Ohin940QR21idnYC3TKBUUsRF33POMWGdIZ1UnStAYIpFK1PB63N0s3QW_A5mulI9PjFu5Uew50uNnOOqCwKHx4UYvi5QMp6dsnCNBkPYUmaIsGJJIyLAn3_D3RdDPfFqx1KqJYhQv-iRlMmKEsK5WO7E9UXshW8eIXbgjr_D6qcHsougofBlf4RgRwINoaUIgyPQ2Kkd8HTh-DpEjy9D57eFtK7p_Y8Uv4kjf4GbzzUhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3066894023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative examination of factors influencing the colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Saláta, József ; Szabó, Ferenc ; Csuti, Péter ; Antal, Melinda ; Márton, Péter ; Hermann, Péter ; Borbély, Judit ; Ábrám, Emese</creator><creatorcontrib>Saláta, József ; Szabó, Ferenc ; Csuti, Péter ; Antal, Melinda ; Márton, Péter ; Hermann, Péter ; Borbély, Judit ; Ábrám, Emese</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of ceramic translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour on the shade of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations proved to be significant in several studies, however, quantitative, numerical results on the relationship between the colour difference and these parameters are still lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantitatively determine how the colour reproduction ability of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic is affected by its translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour.
Ceramic samples were prepared from A2 shade IPS e.max CAD blocks with high and low translucencies (HT and LT) in a thickness range of 0.5-2.5 mm (+/- 0.05 mm). Layered samples were acquired utilizing composite substrates in 9 shades; transparent try-in paste was used. The spectral reflectance of the specimens was assessed under D65 standard illumination with a Konica Minolta CM-3720d spectrophotometer. The CIEDE2000 colour difference (ΔE
) between two samples was analysed using perceptibility and acceptability thresholds set at 50:50%. Statistical analysis involved linear regression analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
An increase in the thickness of 0.5 mm reduced the ΔE
of the HT samples to 72.8%, and that of the T samples to 71.1% (p < 0.0001). 7 substrates with HT and LT specimens had significantly different results from the mean (p < 0.05). A thickness of 0.5 mm is not sufficient to achieve an acceptable result at any level of translucency, while the low translucency ceramic at a thickness of 1.5 mm gave acceptable results, except for severely discoloured substrates (ND8 and ND9).
The colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics is significantly affected by their translucency, layer thickness, and 7 substrates out of 9 substrates examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04429-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38840111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; CAD-CAM systems ; Ceramic materials ; Ceramics ; Ceramics - chemistry ; Cerium oxides ; Color ; Colour ; Colour difference ; Crystallization ; Dental ceramic ; Dental ceramics ; Dental Porcelain - chemistry ; Dentistry ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Lithium ; Lithium compounds ; Lithium disilicate ; Manufacturers ; Materials ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical properties ; Polymerization ; Prosthesis Coloring ; Reproduction ; Shade ; Silicones ; Spectrophotometer ; Spectrophotometry ; Statistical analysis ; Surface Properties ; Translucency</subject><ispartof>BMC oral health, 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.660-11, Article 660</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430w-4b68f622ec046e870c608504e63d73d17ceb52db566b5a0628bec22f7a05787f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155037/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3066894023?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38840111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saláta, József</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csuti, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antal, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márton, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borbély, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ábrám, Emese</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative examination of factors influencing the colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics</title><title>BMC oral health</title><addtitle>BMC Oral Health</addtitle><description>Effects of ceramic translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour on the shade of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations proved to be significant in several studies, however, quantitative, numerical results on the relationship between the colour difference and these parameters are still lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantitatively determine how the colour reproduction ability of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic is affected by its translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour.
Ceramic samples were prepared from A2 shade IPS e.max CAD blocks with high and low translucencies (HT and LT) in a thickness range of 0.5-2.5 mm (+/- 0.05 mm). Layered samples were acquired utilizing composite substrates in 9 shades; transparent try-in paste was used. The spectral reflectance of the specimens was assessed under D65 standard illumination with a Konica Minolta CM-3720d spectrophotometer. The CIEDE2000 colour difference (ΔE
) between two samples was analysed using perceptibility and acceptability thresholds set at 50:50%. Statistical analysis involved linear regression analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
An increase in the thickness of 0.5 mm reduced the ΔE
of the HT samples to 72.8%, and that of the T samples to 71.1% (p < 0.0001). 7 substrates with HT and LT specimens had significantly different results from the mean (p < 0.05). A thickness of 0.5 mm is not sufficient to achieve an acceptable result at any level of translucency, while the low translucency ceramic at a thickness of 1.5 mm gave acceptable results, except for severely discoloured substrates (ND8 and ND9).
The colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics is significantly affected by their translucency, layer thickness, and 7 substrates out of 9 substrates examined.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>CAD-CAM systems</subject><subject>Ceramic materials</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Ceramics - chemistry</subject><subject>Cerium oxides</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Colour</subject><subject>Colour difference</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Dental ceramic</subject><subject>Dental ceramics</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Lithium compounds</subject><subject>Lithium disilicate</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Prosthesis Coloring</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Shade</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Spectrophotometer</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Translucency</subject><issn>1472-6831</issn><issn>1472-6831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIlsIf4IAiceGS4m87J1RVtFSqhJDgbDnOS9arxF5sp0v_Pd7dUroI-fCs55mx3rypqrcYnWOsxMeESYtogwhrEGOkbbbPqlPMJGmEovj5k_tJ9SqlNUJYKsZeVidUKYYwxqdV_rYYn1022d1BDb_M7Hy5B1-HoR6MzSGm2vlhWsBb58c6r6C2YQpLrCNsYugXu4ebzk0u3-9opa7cMte9S6VnTYZ6nExKjYVY9G16Xb0YzJTgzUM9q35cff5--aW5_Xp9c3lx21hG0bZhnVCDIAQsYgKURFYgxREDQXtJeywtdJz0HRei4wYJojqwhAzSIC6VHOhZdXPQ7YNZ6010s4n3Ohin940QR21idnYC3TKBUUsRF33POMWGdIZ1UnStAYIpFK1PB63N0s3QW_A5mulI9PjFu5Uew50uNnOOqCwKHx4UYvi5QMp6dsnCNBkPYUmaIsGJJIyLAn3_D3RdDPfFqx1KqJYhQv-iRlMmKEsK5WO7E9UXshW8eIXbgjr_D6qcHsougofBlf4RgRwINoaUIgyPQ2Kkd8HTh-DpEjy9D57eFtK7p_Y8Uv4kjf4GbzzUhQ</recordid><startdate>20240605</startdate><enddate>20240605</enddate><creator>Saláta, József</creator><creator>Szabó, Ferenc</creator><creator>Csuti, Péter</creator><creator>Antal, Melinda</creator><creator>Márton, Péter</creator><creator>Hermann, Péter</creator><creator>Borbély, Judit</creator><creator>Ábrám, Emese</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240605</creationdate><title>Quantitative examination of factors influencing the colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics</title><author>Saláta, József ; Szabó, Ferenc ; Csuti, Péter ; Antal, Melinda ; Márton, Péter ; Hermann, Péter ; Borbély, Judit ; Ábrám, Emese</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430w-4b68f622ec046e870c608504e63d73d17ceb52db566b5a0628bec22f7a05787f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>CAD-CAM systems</topic><topic>Ceramic materials</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Ceramics - chemistry</topic><topic>Cerium oxides</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Colour</topic><topic>Colour difference</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Dental ceramic</topic><topic>Dental ceramics</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Lithium compounds</topic><topic>Lithium disilicate</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Prosthesis Coloring</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Shade</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Spectrophotometer</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Translucency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saláta, József</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csuti, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antal, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márton, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borbély, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ábrám, Emese</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC oral health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saláta, József</au><au>Szabó, Ferenc</au><au>Csuti, Péter</au><au>Antal, Melinda</au><au>Márton, Péter</au><au>Hermann, Péter</au><au>Borbély, Judit</au><au>Ábrám, Emese</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative examination of factors influencing the colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics</atitle><jtitle>BMC oral health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Oral Health</addtitle><date>2024-06-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>660</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>660-11</pages><artnum>660</artnum><issn>1472-6831</issn><eissn>1472-6831</eissn><abstract>Effects of ceramic translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour on the shade of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations proved to be significant in several studies, however, quantitative, numerical results on the relationship between the colour difference and these parameters are still lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantitatively determine how the colour reproduction ability of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic is affected by its translucency, layer thickness, and substrate colour.
Ceramic samples were prepared from A2 shade IPS e.max CAD blocks with high and low translucencies (HT and LT) in a thickness range of 0.5-2.5 mm (+/- 0.05 mm). Layered samples were acquired utilizing composite substrates in 9 shades; transparent try-in paste was used. The spectral reflectance of the specimens was assessed under D65 standard illumination with a Konica Minolta CM-3720d spectrophotometer. The CIEDE2000 colour difference (ΔE
) between two samples was analysed using perceptibility and acceptability thresholds set at 50:50%. Statistical analysis involved linear regression analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
An increase in the thickness of 0.5 mm reduced the ΔE
of the HT samples to 72.8%, and that of the T samples to 71.1% (p < 0.0001). 7 substrates with HT and LT specimens had significantly different results from the mean (p < 0.05). A thickness of 0.5 mm is not sufficient to achieve an acceptable result at any level of translucency, while the low translucency ceramic at a thickness of 1.5 mm gave acceptable results, except for severely discoloured substrates (ND8 and ND9).
The colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics is significantly affected by their translucency, layer thickness, and 7 substrates out of 9 substrates examined.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38840111</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12903-024-04429-w</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1472-6831 |
| ispartof | BMC oral health, 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.660-11, Article 660 |
| issn | 1472-6831 1472-6831 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9461093056dd4531a2ba4b76b9ae213e |
| source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Analysis CAD-CAM systems Ceramic materials Ceramics Ceramics - chemistry Cerium oxides Color Colour Colour difference Crystallization Dental ceramic Dental ceramics Dental Porcelain - chemistry Dentistry Health aspects Humans Lithium Lithium compounds Lithium disilicate Manufacturers Materials Materials Testing Mechanical properties Polymerization Prosthesis Coloring Reproduction Shade Silicones Spectrophotometer Spectrophotometry Statistical analysis Surface Properties Translucency |
| title | Quantitative examination of factors influencing the colour reproduction ability of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T11%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20examination%20of%20factors%20influencing%20the%20colour%20reproduction%20ability%20of%20lithium%20disilicate%20glass-ceramics&rft.jtitle=BMC%20oral%20health&rft.au=Sal%C3%A1ta,%20J%C3%B3zsef&rft.date=2024-06-05&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=660&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=660-11&rft.artnum=660&rft.issn=1472-6831&rft.eissn=1472-6831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12903-024-04429-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA796585019%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430w-4b68f622ec046e870c608504e63d73d17ceb52db566b5a0628bec22f7a05787f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3066894023&rft_id=info:pmid/38840111&rft_galeid=A796585019&rfr_iscdi=true |