A simulation-based randomized trial of ABCDE style cognitive aid for emergency medical services CHecklist In Prehospital Settings: the CHIPS-study

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2023-11, Vol.31 (1), p.81-81, Article 81
• Main Authors: Droege, Helena, Trentzsch, Heiko, Zech, Alexandra, Prückner, Stephan, Imach, Sebastian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ABCDE mnemonic; ABCDE scheme; Aviation; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Catheters; Checklists; CPR; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical personnel; Emergency services; Health care teams; Hospitals; Human error; Infections; Intensive care; Medical care; Medical errors; Medicine; Memory; Mnemonics; Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); Paramedics; Patient safety; Practice; Psychological aspects; Quality management; Resuscitation; Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC); Simulation; Teams; Testing
• ISSN: 1757-7241; 1757-7241
• DOI: 10.1186/s13049-023-01144-3

Background Checklists are a powerful tool for reduction of mortality and morbidity. Checklists structure complex processes in a reproducible manner, optimize team interaction, and prevent errors related to human factors. Despite wide dissemination of the checklist, effects of checklist use in the prehospital emergency medicine are currently unclear. The aim of the study was to demonstrate that participants achieve higher adherence to guideline-recommended actions, manage the scenario more time-efficient, and thirdly demonstrate better adherence to the ABCDE-compliant workflow in a simulated ROSC situation. Methods CHIPS was a prospective randomized case-control study. Professional emergency medical service teams were asked to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on an adult high-fidelity patient simulator achieving ROSC. The intervention group used a checklist which transferred the ERC guideline statements of ROSC into the structure of the 'ABCDE' mnemonic. Guideline adherence (performance score, PS), utilization of process time (items/minute) and workflow were measured by analyzing continuous A/V recordings of the simulation. Pre- and post-questionnaires addressing demographics and relevance of the checklist were recorded. Effect sizes were determined by calculating Cohen's d. The level of significance was defined at p < 0.05. Results Twenty scenarios in the intervention group (INT) and twenty-one in the control group (CON) were evaluated. The average time of use of the checklist (CU) in the INT was 6.32 min (2.39-9.18 min; SD = 2.08 min). Mean PS of INT was significantly higher than CON, with a strong effect size (p = 0.001, d = 0.935). In the INT, significantly more items were completed per minute of scenario duration (INT, 1.48 items/min; CON, 1.15 items/min, difference: 0.33/min (25%), p = 0.001), showing a large effect size (d = 1.11). The workflow did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.079), although a medium effect size was shown (d = 0.563) with the tendency of the CON group deviating stronger from the ABCDE than the INT. Conclusion Checklists can have positive effects on outcome in the prehospital setting by significantly facilitates adherence to guidelines. Checklist use may be time-effective in the prehospital setting. Checklists based on the 'ABCDE' mnemonic can be used according to the 'do verify' approach. Team Time Outs are recommended to start and finish checklists. Keywords: Checklists, ABCDE scheme, ABCDE mnemonic, Retur