Long-term follow-up of therapeutic efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in comparison to everolimus-eluting stent in treatment of chronic total occlusion guided by intracoronary imaging

• Published in: The Egyptian heart journal 2020-10, Vol.72 (1), p.72-72, Article 72
• Main Authors: Eltahlawi, Mohammad Abdallah, Abdel-Aziz, Abdel-Aziz Fouad, Sherif, Abdel-Salam, Shokry, Khalid Abdel-Azeem, Shehata, Islam Elsayed
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angioplasty; Bioresorbable vascular stents; Blood pressure; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Chronic total occlusion; Comparative analysis; Coronary artery disease; Coronary vessels; Creatinine; CT imaging; Drug-eluting stent; Ejection fraction; Electrocardiogram; Electrocardiography; Family medical history; Fasting; Health aspects; Heart attacks; High density lipoprotein; Hypertension; Intracoronary imaging; Laboratories; Medical colleges; Medical imaging; Medical research; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Medicine, Experimental; Multi-slice CT coronary angiography; Stent (Surgery); Stents; Tomography; Triglycerides; Vein & artery diseases
• ISSN: 2090-911X; 1110-2608; 2090-911X
• DOI: 10.1186/s43044-020-00104-x

Background We hypothesized that 1st generation everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) stent associated with less complication and less restenosis rate than everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization guided by intracoronary imaging. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and performance of BVS stent in CTO revascularization in comparison to EES guided by intracoronary imaging. Our prospective comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 60 CTO patients divided into two groups according to type of stent revascularization: group I (EES group): 40 (66.7%) patients and group II (BVS group): 20 (33.3%) patients. All patients were subjected to history taking, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, laboratory investigation, stress thallium study to assess viability before revascularization. Revascularization of viable CTO lesion guided by intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Then, long-term follow-up over 1 year clinically and by multi-slice CT coronary angiography (MSCT). Our clinical and angiographic endpoints were to detect any clinical or angiographic complications during the follow-up period. Results At 6 months angiographic follow-up, BVS group had not inferior angiographic parameters but without statistically significant difference ( p = 0.566). At 12 months follow-up, there was no difference at end points between the two groups ( p = 0.476). No differences were found at angiographic or clinical follow-up between BVS and EES. Conclusion This study shows that 1st generation everolimus-eluting BVS is non-inferior to EES for CTO revascularization. Further studies are needed to clearly state which new smaller footprint BVS, faster reabsorption, magnesium-based less thrombogenicity, and advanced mechanical properties is under development. We cannot dismiss the efficacy and safety of new BVS technology. Trial registration ZU-IRB#2498/3-12-2016 Registered 3 December 2016, email: [e-mail]