Loading…
Optimal single sampling time-point for monitoring of praziquantel exposure in children
Praziquantel pharmacokinetics studies in schistosomiasis infected children are scarce partly due to the challenges/complexity of intensive blood sampling in the target population. This study was aimed to investigate the optimal single sampling time-point for monitoring praziquantel exposure. This wa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2021-09, Vol.11 (1), p.17955-17955, Article 17955 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Praziquantel pharmacokinetics studies in schistosomiasis infected children are scarce partly due to the challenges/complexity of intensive blood sampling in the target population. This study was aimed to investigate the optimal single sampling time-point for monitoring praziquantel exposure. This was intensive pharmacokinetic study conducted among 32
Schistosoma mansoni
infected children treated with an oral standard single-dose 40 mg/kg praziquantel. Plasma samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h post-praziquantel administration. Quantification of praziquantel and its enantiomers (
R-
and
S-
praziquantel) concentrations was done by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer (LC–MS/MS). The correlation between area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC
8
) and plasma concentrations at each specific sampling time-point was determined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r
2
). The median age (range) of the study population was 12.5 years (10–17). The study participants were 17 males and 15 females. Both total praziquantel and its enantiomers (
R-
and
S-
praziquantel) displayed a wide inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. Regression analysis indicated that, plasma concentrations collected at 4 h post-dose had a significantly highest correlation with the AUC
8
for both total praziquantel (r
2
= 0.81, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-97409-x |