Loading…

Morphology and Fixation Pitfalls of a Highly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Variant

Purpose. To describe a variant of intertrochanteric fracture not well-characterised in the existing classification systems. Methods. 10 women and 2 men aged 59 to 98 (median, 80) years with intertrochanteric fractures characterised by a low intertrochanteric fracture, a basicervical fracture fragmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) 2015-08, Vol.23 (2), p.142-145
Main Authors: Tan, Bryan Yijia, Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang, Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fdb02f76ac3c75f2854c9aa67449c1b77b3afea297df45c89127ac3d93bf0e973
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fdb02f76ac3c75f2854c9aa67449c1b77b3afea297df45c89127ac3d93bf0e973
container_end_page 145
container_issue 2
container_start_page 142
container_title Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)
container_volume 23
creator Tan, Bryan Yijia
Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang
Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee
description Purpose. To describe a variant of intertrochanteric fracture not well-characterised in the existing classification systems. Methods. 10 women and 2 men aged 59 to 98 (median, 80) years with intertrochanteric fractures characterised by a low intertrochanteric fracture, a basicervical fracture fragment, and a thin or fractured lateral wall with greater trochanteric comminution were reviewed. Results. The 12 fractures were classified as A2.1 (n=1), A2.2 (n=7), A2.3 (n=1), and A3 (n=3) according to the AO/OTA classification, and as type 3 (n=2), type 5 (n=7), and type 6 (n=3) according to the Evans classification. The fractures were characterised by greater trochanter comminution and a coronal plane fracture extending into the greater trochanter resulting in a loss of superolateral support. Patients were treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (n=5), the Proximal Femur Locking Plate (n=6), or the reversed Less Invasive Stabilization System for distal femur (n=1). Within the mean follow-up period of 6 months, 3 patients with plating and one patient with nailing had mechanical failure defined as loss of alignment of >10° or screw cutout. Conclusion. This intertrochanteric fracture variant is highly unstable with a high failure rate. Loss of superolateral support rather than the medial calcar buttress is the main contributing factor to mechanical failure. Computed tomography is important in preoperative planning. Intramedullary nailing is more appropriate than extramedullary plating for such unstable fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/230949901502300204
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_953d872e667b428eab2d1b38927a0ec8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_230949901502300204</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_953d872e667b428eab2d1b38927a0ec8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1708899767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fdb02f76ac3c75f2854c9aa67449c1b77b3afea297df45c89127ac3d93bf0e973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIwI2bcvJ-LGWwnYYRXTjirriVSnWnqa60SQrsf2_KHgdRXOVy-M65NxyEXlLyllKtrxgnVlhLqCR1JIyIR2i1iM2iPkYrShhrpOTqAj3LeU8Itcyop-iCKc6o5HqFvn2M6biLY9yeMEw9XocfUEKc8OdQBhjHjOOAAd-E7W484bspF-hGjzdT8amk6HawTMHhdQJX5uTxV0ihis_Rk-rP_sX9e4nu1u-_XN80t58-bK7f3TZOCl2aoe8IG7QCx52WAzNSOAugtBDW0U7rjsPggVndD0I6YynTle0t7wbireaXaHPO7SPs22MKB0inNkJofwkxbVtIJbjRt1by3mjmldKdYMZDx3racWNrJPHO1Kw356xjit9nn0t7CNn5cYTJxzm3VBNjrNVqWfv6L3Qf5zTVn1aKSiUMkaJS7Ey5FHNOfng4kJJ26bD9t8NqenUfPXcH3z9YfpdWgaszkGHr_9j7_8ifPZ6jJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1715648054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphology and Fixation Pitfalls of a Highly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Variant</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Tan, Bryan Yijia ; Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang ; Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Bryan Yijia ; Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang ; Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose. To describe a variant of intertrochanteric fracture not well-characterised in the existing classification systems. Methods. 10 women and 2 men aged 59 to 98 (median, 80) years with intertrochanteric fractures characterised by a low intertrochanteric fracture, a basicervical fracture fragment, and a thin or fractured lateral wall with greater trochanteric comminution were reviewed. Results. The 12 fractures were classified as A2.1 (n=1), A2.2 (n=7), A2.3 (n=1), and A3 (n=3) according to the AO/OTA classification, and as type 3 (n=2), type 5 (n=7), and type 6 (n=3) according to the Evans classification. The fractures were characterised by greater trochanter comminution and a coronal plane fracture extending into the greater trochanter resulting in a loss of superolateral support. Patients were treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (n=5), the Proximal Femur Locking Plate (n=6), or the reversed Less Invasive Stabilization System for distal femur (n=1). Within the mean follow-up period of 6 months, 3 patients with plating and one patient with nailing had mechanical failure defined as loss of alignment of &gt;10° or screw cutout. Conclusion. This intertrochanteric fracture variant is highly unstable with a high failure rate. Loss of superolateral support rather than the medial calcar buttress is the main contributing factor to mechanical failure. Computed tomography is important in preoperative planning. Intramedullary nailing is more appropriate than extramedullary plating for such unstable fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1022-5536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2309-4990</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/230949901502300204</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26321537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Classification ; Female ; Femur - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Fractures ; Fractures, Comminuted - surgery ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Hip joint ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Patients ; Tomography ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong), 2015-08, Vol.23 (2), p.142-145</ispartof><rights>2015 Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses.</rights><rights>Copyright Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fdb02f76ac3c75f2854c9aa67449c1b77b3afea297df45c89127ac3d93bf0e973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fdb02f76ac3c75f2854c9aa67449c1b77b3afea297df45c89127ac3d93bf0e973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1715648054/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1715648054?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21947,25734,27834,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,44926,45314,74875</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/230949901502300204?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Bryan Yijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee</creatorcontrib><title>Morphology and Fixation Pitfalls of a Highly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Variant</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)</title><addtitle>J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)</addtitle><description>Purpose. To describe a variant of intertrochanteric fracture not well-characterised in the existing classification systems. Methods. 10 women and 2 men aged 59 to 98 (median, 80) years with intertrochanteric fractures characterised by a low intertrochanteric fracture, a basicervical fracture fragment, and a thin or fractured lateral wall with greater trochanteric comminution were reviewed. Results. The 12 fractures were classified as A2.1 (n=1), A2.2 (n=7), A2.3 (n=1), and A3 (n=3) according to the AO/OTA classification, and as type 3 (n=2), type 5 (n=7), and type 6 (n=3) according to the Evans classification. The fractures were characterised by greater trochanter comminution and a coronal plane fracture extending into the greater trochanter resulting in a loss of superolateral support. Patients were treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (n=5), the Proximal Femur Locking Plate (n=6), or the reversed Less Invasive Stabilization System for distal femur (n=1). Within the mean follow-up period of 6 months, 3 patients with plating and one patient with nailing had mechanical failure defined as loss of alignment of &gt;10° or screw cutout. Conclusion. This intertrochanteric fracture variant is highly unstable with a high failure rate. Loss of superolateral support rather than the medial calcar buttress is the main contributing factor to mechanical failure. Computed tomography is important in preoperative planning. Intramedullary nailing is more appropriate than extramedullary plating for such unstable fractures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fractures, Comminuted - surgery</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>1022-5536</issn><issn>2309-4990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIwI2bcvJ-LGWwnYYRXTjirriVSnWnqa60SQrsf2_KHgdRXOVy-M65NxyEXlLyllKtrxgnVlhLqCR1JIyIR2i1iM2iPkYrShhrpOTqAj3LeU8Itcyop-iCKc6o5HqFvn2M6biLY9yeMEw9XocfUEKc8OdQBhjHjOOAAd-E7W484bspF-hGjzdT8amk6HawTMHhdQJX5uTxV0ihis_Rk-rP_sX9e4nu1u-_XN80t58-bK7f3TZOCl2aoe8IG7QCx52WAzNSOAugtBDW0U7rjsPggVndD0I6YynTle0t7wbireaXaHPO7SPs22MKB0inNkJofwkxbVtIJbjRt1by3mjmldKdYMZDx3racWNrJPHO1Kw356xjit9nn0t7CNn5cYTJxzm3VBNjrNVqWfv6L3Qf5zTVn1aKSiUMkaJS7Ey5FHNOfng4kJJ26bD9t8NqenUfPXcH3z9YfpdWgaszkGHr_9j7_8ifPZ6jJA</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Tan, Bryan Yijia</creator><creator>Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang</creator><creator>Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Morphology and Fixation Pitfalls of a Highly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Variant</title><author>Tan, Bryan Yijia ; Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang ; Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fdb02f76ac3c75f2854c9aa67449c1b77b3afea297df45c89127ac3d93bf0e973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fractures, Comminuted - surgery</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Bryan Yijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East &amp; South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Bryan Yijia</au><au>Lau, Adrian Cheng Kiang</au><au>Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphology and Fixation Pitfalls of a Highly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Variant</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>142-145</pages><issn>1022-5536</issn><eissn>2309-4990</eissn><abstract>Purpose. To describe a variant of intertrochanteric fracture not well-characterised in the existing classification systems. Methods. 10 women and 2 men aged 59 to 98 (median, 80) years with intertrochanteric fractures characterised by a low intertrochanteric fracture, a basicervical fracture fragment, and a thin or fractured lateral wall with greater trochanteric comminution were reviewed. Results. The 12 fractures were classified as A2.1 (n=1), A2.2 (n=7), A2.3 (n=1), and A3 (n=3) according to the AO/OTA classification, and as type 3 (n=2), type 5 (n=7), and type 6 (n=3) according to the Evans classification. The fractures were characterised by greater trochanter comminution and a coronal plane fracture extending into the greater trochanter resulting in a loss of superolateral support. Patients were treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (n=5), the Proximal Femur Locking Plate (n=6), or the reversed Less Invasive Stabilization System for distal femur (n=1). Within the mean follow-up period of 6 months, 3 patients with plating and one patient with nailing had mechanical failure defined as loss of alignment of &gt;10° or screw cutout. Conclusion. This intertrochanteric fracture variant is highly unstable with a high failure rate. Loss of superolateral support rather than the medial calcar buttress is the main contributing factor to mechanical failure. Computed tomography is important in preoperative planning. Intramedullary nailing is more appropriate than extramedullary plating for such unstable fractures.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26321537</pmid><doi>10.1177/230949901502300204</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1022-5536
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong), 2015-08, Vol.23 (2), p.142-145
issn 1022-5536
2309-4990
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_953d872e667b428eab2d1b38927a0ec8
source SAGE Open Access
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Classification
Female
Femur - surgery
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods
Fractures
Fractures, Comminuted - surgery
Hip Fractures - surgery
Hip joint
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Morphology
Patients
Tomography
Transplants & implants
title Morphology and Fixation Pitfalls of a Highly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Variant
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphology%20and%20Fixation%20Pitfalls%20of%20a%20Highly%20Unstable%20Intertrochanteric%20Fracture%20Variant&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20(Hong%20Kong)&rft.au=Tan,%20Bryan%20Yijia&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=142-145&rft.issn=1022-5536&rft.eissn=2309-4990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/230949901502300204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E1708899767%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fdb02f76ac3c75f2854c9aa67449c1b77b3afea297df45c89127ac3d93bf0e973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1715648054&rft_id=info:pmid/26321537&rft_sage_id=10.1177_230949901502300204&rfr_iscdi=true