Loading…

The Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon in combination with a cobalt-chromium stent in two different sequences to treat de novo coronary artery lesions: An angiographic follow up study

Abstract Introduction The paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter (DCB) based on the PACCOCATH® technology has yielded angiographic and clinical results superior to drug-eluting stents (DES) in situations like in-stent restenosis (ISR) and a trend towards superior results in small coronary vessels and si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian heart journal 2013-09, Vol.65 (5), p.510-517
Main Authors: Kaul, Upendra, Unverdorben, Martin, Degenhardt, Ralf, Seth, Ashok, Bahl, Vinay K, Hiremath, Shirish M.S, Chandra, Praveen, Mullesari, Ajit S, Sandhu, P.S, Rao, Seshagiri, George, Oommen, Ackermann, Hanns, Boxberger, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction The paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter (DCB) based on the PACCOCATH® technology has yielded angiographic and clinical results superior to drug-eluting stents (DES) in situations like in-stent restenosis (ISR) and a trend towards superior results in small coronary vessels and side branches of coronary bifurcations. Using the DCB followed by cobalt–chromium stent (CoCr) deployment or with a reverse sequence may yield different outcomes in terms of late loss. Methods 97 patients with de-novo coronary stenosis (55.6 ± 10.7 years, 79.4% male, ≥70%, length: ≤25 mm, vessel diameter: 2.5–4.0 mm) were randomly treated with the DCB (3 μg/mm²) followed by a CoCr-stent or stent first and DCB later. Six-month angiographic and one-year clinical follow-up intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Results Angiographic and demographic baseline data was comparable between the two groups. When comparing balloon first versus stent first technique, the primary outcome variables were not statistically different for mean in-segment (0.51 ± 0.56 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.55 mm, p  = 0.23) and in-stent (0.52 ± 0.55 mm vs. 0.46 ± 0.52 mm, p  = 0.65) late lumen loss. The lesion related 12-month MACE rates were 5/49 (10.2%) and 2/48 (4.2%) ( p  = 0.44). Lesion related thrombotic events occurred in three patients in balloon first and in one patient in stent first group, two of which were associated with early discontinuation of continuous dual anti-platelet therapy, two with suboptimal PCI, and one each were performed in a thrombotic lesion and a bifurcation type 1.1.0. Conclusion Drug-coated balloon first followed by cobalt chromium stent deployment versus a reverse sequence is not associated with statistically significantly different 6-month angiographic or 12-month clinical outcomes.
ISSN:0019-4832
DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2013.08.011