Loading…

Performing Through Privatization: An Ecological Natural Experiment of the Impact of the Swedish Free Choice Reform on Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions

Background: In 2010, Sweden opened up for establishment of privately owned primary health care providers, as part of a national Free Choice in Primary Health Care reform. The reform has been highly debated, and evidence on its effects is scarce. The present study therefore sought to evaluate whether...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in public health 2021-05, Vol.9, p.504998-504998
Main Authors: Mosquera, Paola A., San Sebastian, Miguel, Burström, Bo, Hurtig, Anna-Karin, Gustafsson, Per E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8de48eca0c35ccedc1e48e424c4c4701c6762fcecbf16426c72a243e61c4de53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8de48eca0c35ccedc1e48e424c4c4701c6762fcecbf16426c72a243e61c4de53
container_end_page 504998
container_issue
container_start_page 504998
container_title Frontiers in public health
container_volume 9
creator Mosquera, Paola A.
San Sebastian, Miguel
Burström, Bo
Hurtig, Anna-Karin
Gustafsson, Per E.
description Background: In 2010, Sweden opened up for establishment of privately owned primary health care providers, as part of a national Free Choice in Primary Health Care reform. The reform has been highly debated, and evidence on its effects is scarce. The present study therefore sought to evaluate whether the reform have impacted on primary health care service performance. Methods: This ecological register-based study used a natural experimental approach through an interrupted time series design. Data comprised the total adult population of the 21 counties of Sweden 2001–2009 (pre-intervention period) and 2010–2016 (post-intervention period). Hospitalizations and emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were used as indicators of primary health care performance. Segmented regression analysis was used to assess the effects of the reform, in Sweden as a whole, as well as compared between counties grouped by (i) change in private provision pre- to post reform; (ii) the timing of the implementation; and (iii) sustained presence of private providers both pre- and post-reform. Results: The results suggest that, following the introduction of the reform in Sweden as a whole, the trends in total hospitalizations rates were slowed down by 1.0% albeit acute emergency visits increased 1.1% more rapidly after the introduction of the reform. However, we found no evidence of more beneficial effects in counties where the reform had been implemented more ambitiously, specifically those with a larger increase in private primary care providers, or where the reform was introduced early and thus had longer time effects to emerge. Lastly, counties with a sustained high presence of private primary care providers displayed the least favorable development when it comes to ACSC. Conclusion: Taken together, the present study does not support that the Swedish Free Choice reform has improved performance of the primary care delivery system in Sweden, and suggests that high degree of private provision may involve worse performance and higher care burden for specialized health care. Further evaluations of the consequences of the reform are dire needed to provide a comprehensive picture of its intended and unintended impact on health care provision, delivery and results.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpubh.2021.504998
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_96852158f20747e2af7fa642ba84d4f5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_96852158f20747e2af7fa642ba84d4f5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2542357797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8de48eca0c35ccedc1e48e424c4c4701c6762fcecbf16426c72a243e61c4de53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk2P0zAQjRCIXS37A7j5yKXFX3EcDkhV6UKlFayg4mq5zrjxksTFTrosP4Vfi9NUK3pA1mg84zdvPJqXZa8JnjMmy7d2P2zrOcWUzHPMy1I-yy4pLcWM5iJ__s_9IruO8R5jTDDjCf4yu2CcMMG5uMz-3EGwPrSu26FNHfywq9FdcAfdu9_JfPcOLTq0Mr7xO2d0gz7rfgjJr37tIbgWuh55i_oa0Lrda_MUfXuAysUa3QQAtKy9M4C-wtgK-Q4t2u3Q6N6HR7TUIaGhi653hwT1XeXGxvFV9sLqJsL1yV9lm5vVZvlpdvvl43q5uJ2ZXMh-JivgEozGhuXGQGXIGHPKTToFJkYUgloDZmuJ4FSYgmrKGQhieAU5u8rWE23l9b3ap5l0eFReO3VM-LBTOvTONKBKIXNKcmkpLngBVNvC6sS51ZJX3I5c5cQVHyCt54xtH3ylTvkfbjQVQREuJOMFkal29t_aD-774viToR0UkbzEI_79hE_gNo2dNpH2ct7y7KVztdr5g5IUYyF4InhzIgj-5wCxV62LBppGd-CHqGjOKcuLoiwSlExQE3yMAexTG4LVqEZ1VKMa1agmNbK_i7XW7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2542357797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performing Through Privatization: An Ecological Natural Experiment of the Impact of the Swedish Free Choice Reform on Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Mosquera, Paola A. ; San Sebastian, Miguel ; Burström, Bo ; Hurtig, Anna-Karin ; Gustafsson, Per E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mosquera, Paola A. ; San Sebastian, Miguel ; Burström, Bo ; Hurtig, Anna-Karin ; Gustafsson, Per E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: In 2010, Sweden opened up for establishment of privately owned primary health care providers, as part of a national Free Choice in Primary Health Care reform. The reform has been highly debated, and evidence on its effects is scarce. The present study therefore sought to evaluate whether the reform have impacted on primary health care service performance. Methods: This ecological register-based study used a natural experimental approach through an interrupted time series design. Data comprised the total adult population of the 21 counties of Sweden 2001–2009 (pre-intervention period) and 2010–2016 (post-intervention period). Hospitalizations and emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were used as indicators of primary health care performance. Segmented regression analysis was used to assess the effects of the reform, in Sweden as a whole, as well as compared between counties grouped by (i) change in private provision pre- to post reform; (ii) the timing of the implementation; and (iii) sustained presence of private providers both pre- and post-reform. Results: The results suggest that, following the introduction of the reform in Sweden as a whole, the trends in total hospitalizations rates were slowed down by 1.0% albeit acute emergency visits increased 1.1% more rapidly after the introduction of the reform. However, we found no evidence of more beneficial effects in counties where the reform had been implemented more ambitiously, specifically those with a larger increase in private primary care providers, or where the reform was introduced early and thus had longer time effects to emerge. Lastly, counties with a sustained high presence of private primary care providers displayed the least favorable development when it comes to ACSC. Conclusion: Taken together, the present study does not support that the Swedish Free Choice reform has improved performance of the primary care delivery system in Sweden, and suggests that high degree of private provision may involve worse performance and higher care burden for specialized health care. Further evaluations of the consequences of the reform are dire needed to provide a comprehensive picture of its intended and unintended impact on health care provision, delivery and results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2296-2565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2296-2565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.504998</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34136446</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>ambulatory care sensitive conditions ; health system reform ; interrupted time series analysis ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; natural experiment ; Public Health ; Sweden</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in public health, 2021-05, Vol.9, p.504998-504998</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Mosquera, San Sebastian, Burström, Hurtig and Gustafsson. 2021 Mosquera, San Sebastian, Burström, Hurtig and Gustafsson</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8de48eca0c35ccedc1e48e424c4c4701c6762fcecbf16426c72a243e61c4de53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8de48eca0c35ccedc1e48e424c4c4701c6762fcecbf16426c72a243e61c4de53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200664/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200664/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-184908$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:146834718$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mosquera, Paola A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Sebastian, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burström, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurtig, Anna-Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Per E.</creatorcontrib><title>Performing Through Privatization: An Ecological Natural Experiment of the Impact of the Swedish Free Choice Reform on Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions</title><title>Frontiers in public health</title><description>Background: In 2010, Sweden opened up for establishment of privately owned primary health care providers, as part of a national Free Choice in Primary Health Care reform. The reform has been highly debated, and evidence on its effects is scarce. The present study therefore sought to evaluate whether the reform have impacted on primary health care service performance. Methods: This ecological register-based study used a natural experimental approach through an interrupted time series design. Data comprised the total adult population of the 21 counties of Sweden 2001–2009 (pre-intervention period) and 2010–2016 (post-intervention period). Hospitalizations and emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were used as indicators of primary health care performance. Segmented regression analysis was used to assess the effects of the reform, in Sweden as a whole, as well as compared between counties grouped by (i) change in private provision pre- to post reform; (ii) the timing of the implementation; and (iii) sustained presence of private providers both pre- and post-reform. Results: The results suggest that, following the introduction of the reform in Sweden as a whole, the trends in total hospitalizations rates were slowed down by 1.0% albeit acute emergency visits increased 1.1% more rapidly after the introduction of the reform. However, we found no evidence of more beneficial effects in counties where the reform had been implemented more ambitiously, specifically those with a larger increase in private primary care providers, or where the reform was introduced early and thus had longer time effects to emerge. Lastly, counties with a sustained high presence of private primary care providers displayed the least favorable development when it comes to ACSC. Conclusion: Taken together, the present study does not support that the Swedish Free Choice reform has improved performance of the primary care delivery system in Sweden, and suggests that high degree of private provision may involve worse performance and higher care burden for specialized health care. Further evaluations of the consequences of the reform are dire needed to provide a comprehensive picture of its intended and unintended impact on health care provision, delivery and results.</description><subject>ambulatory care sensitive conditions</subject><subject>health system reform</subject><subject>interrupted time series analysis</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>natural experiment</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><issn>2296-2565</issn><issn>2296-2565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk2P0zAQjRCIXS37A7j5yKXFX3EcDkhV6UKlFayg4mq5zrjxksTFTrosP4Vfi9NUK3pA1mg84zdvPJqXZa8JnjMmy7d2P2zrOcWUzHPMy1I-yy4pLcWM5iJ__s_9IruO8R5jTDDjCf4yu2CcMMG5uMz-3EGwPrSu26FNHfywq9FdcAfdu9_JfPcOLTq0Mr7xO2d0gz7rfgjJr37tIbgWuh55i_oa0Lrda_MUfXuAysUa3QQAtKy9M4C-wtgK-Q4t2u3Q6N6HR7TUIaGhi653hwT1XeXGxvFV9sLqJsL1yV9lm5vVZvlpdvvl43q5uJ2ZXMh-JivgEozGhuXGQGXIGHPKTToFJkYUgloDZmuJ4FSYgmrKGQhieAU5u8rWE23l9b3ap5l0eFReO3VM-LBTOvTONKBKIXNKcmkpLngBVNvC6sS51ZJX3I5c5cQVHyCt54xtH3ylTvkfbjQVQREuJOMFkal29t_aD-774viToR0UkbzEI_79hE_gNo2dNpH2ct7y7KVztdr5g5IUYyF4InhzIgj-5wCxV62LBppGd-CHqGjOKcuLoiwSlExQE3yMAexTG4LVqEZ1VKMa1agmNbK_i7XW7g</recordid><startdate>20210531</startdate><enddate>20210531</enddate><creator>Mosquera, Paola A.</creator><creator>San Sebastian, Miguel</creator><creator>Burström, Bo</creator><creator>Hurtig, Anna-Karin</creator><creator>Gustafsson, Per E.</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADHXS</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D93</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210531</creationdate><title>Performing Through Privatization: An Ecological Natural Experiment of the Impact of the Swedish Free Choice Reform on Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions</title><author>Mosquera, Paola A. ; San Sebastian, Miguel ; Burström, Bo ; Hurtig, Anna-Karin ; Gustafsson, Per E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8de48eca0c35ccedc1e48e424c4c4701c6762fcecbf16426c72a243e61c4de53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>ambulatory care sensitive conditions</topic><topic>health system reform</topic><topic>interrupted time series analysis</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>natural experiment</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mosquera, Paola A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Sebastian, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burström, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurtig, Anna-Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Per E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals(OpenAccess)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mosquera, Paola A.</au><au>San Sebastian, Miguel</au><au>Burström, Bo</au><au>Hurtig, Anna-Karin</au><au>Gustafsson, Per E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performing Through Privatization: An Ecological Natural Experiment of the Impact of the Swedish Free Choice Reform on Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in public health</jtitle><date>2021-05-31</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>504998</spage><epage>504998</epage><pages>504998-504998</pages><issn>2296-2565</issn><eissn>2296-2565</eissn><abstract>Background: In 2010, Sweden opened up for establishment of privately owned primary health care providers, as part of a national Free Choice in Primary Health Care reform. The reform has been highly debated, and evidence on its effects is scarce. The present study therefore sought to evaluate whether the reform have impacted on primary health care service performance. Methods: This ecological register-based study used a natural experimental approach through an interrupted time series design. Data comprised the total adult population of the 21 counties of Sweden 2001–2009 (pre-intervention period) and 2010–2016 (post-intervention period). Hospitalizations and emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were used as indicators of primary health care performance. Segmented regression analysis was used to assess the effects of the reform, in Sweden as a whole, as well as compared between counties grouped by (i) change in private provision pre- to post reform; (ii) the timing of the implementation; and (iii) sustained presence of private providers both pre- and post-reform. Results: The results suggest that, following the introduction of the reform in Sweden as a whole, the trends in total hospitalizations rates were slowed down by 1.0% albeit acute emergency visits increased 1.1% more rapidly after the introduction of the reform. However, we found no evidence of more beneficial effects in counties where the reform had been implemented more ambitiously, specifically those with a larger increase in private primary care providers, or where the reform was introduced early and thus had longer time effects to emerge. Lastly, counties with a sustained high presence of private primary care providers displayed the least favorable development when it comes to ACSC. Conclusion: Taken together, the present study does not support that the Swedish Free Choice reform has improved performance of the primary care delivery system in Sweden, and suggests that high degree of private provision may involve worse performance and higher care burden for specialized health care. Further evaluations of the consequences of the reform are dire needed to provide a comprehensive picture of its intended and unintended impact on health care provision, delivery and results.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>34136446</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpubh.2021.504998</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2296-2565
ispartof Frontiers in public health, 2021-05, Vol.9, p.504998-504998
issn 2296-2565
2296-2565
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_96852158f20747e2af7fa642ba84d4f5
source PubMed Central (Open Access)
subjects ambulatory care sensitive conditions
health system reform
interrupted time series analysis
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
natural experiment
Public Health
Sweden
title Performing Through Privatization: An Ecological Natural Experiment of the Impact of the Swedish Free Choice Reform on Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A45%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performing%20Through%20Privatization:%20An%20Ecological%20Natural%20Experiment%20of%20the%20Impact%20of%20the%20Swedish%20Free%20Choice%20Reform%20on%20Ambulatory%20Care%20Sensitive%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20public%20health&rft.au=Mosquera,%20Paola%20A.&rft.date=2021-05-31&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=504998&rft.epage=504998&rft.pages=504998-504998&rft.issn=2296-2565&rft.eissn=2296-2565&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpubh.2021.504998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2542357797%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8de48eca0c35ccedc1e48e424c4c4701c6762fcecbf16426c72a243e61c4de53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2542357797&rft_id=info:pmid/34136446&rfr_iscdi=true