Mitigating the Environmental Impacts from Pig and Broiler Chicken Productions: Case Study on a Citrus Extract Feed Additive

• Published in: Animals (Basel) 2023-11, Vol.13 (23), p.3702
• Main Authors: Bui, Hoa, Cisse, Sekhou Hedaly, Ceccaldi, Mathilde, Perrin, Aurélie, Benarbia, Mohammed El Amine, Chicoteau, Pierre
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agriculture; Air pollution; Animal feeding and feeds; Animals; broiler chicken; Case studies; Citrus; citrus extract; Citrus fruits; Costs (Law); Emission standards; Emissions; Environmental auditing; Environmental impact; Environmental sustainability; Farms; feed additives; Feeds; Greenhouse gases; Hogs; Ingredients; life-cycle assessment; Livestock; Livestock farms; Meta-analysis; Poultry; Poultry industry; Swine
• ISSN: 2076-2615; 2076-2615
• DOI: 10.3390/ani13233702

The rapid expansion of the livestock production sector to meet the world population's demand is posing a big challenge to environmental sustainability. Plant-based feed additives extracted from agro-food byproducts could potentially result in multiple outcomes: reducing food-processing wastes and improving animal growth performances, hence mitigating environmental impacts of meat production chains. This presented study was carried out to assess the environmental impacts of the use of a commercial citrus extract feed additive (CEFA) in swine and broiler chicken farming. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to assess the impact of manufacturing and distributing one 25 kg bag of CEFA and its use in feed in broiler chicken and swine productions. With regards to CEFA manufacturing and distribution, results showed that most of the impact came from the production of CEFA ingredients, accounting for 70% of the impact generated. The remaining 30% effect was divided between transportation to the customer (25%), CEFA packaging (3%), and CEFA manufacturing and production loss (2%). When enlarging the scope, the use of the CEFA in pigs and broilers' diets was shown to improve the measured environmental indicators, compared to such standard systems. Indeed, CEFA-added feeds have demonstrated enhanced growth performances, hence reducing the required amount of consumed feed to achieve the same level of growth. Consequently, this helped reduce environmental issues from animal feed ingredients' agriculture. To be more specific, the use of one 25 kg bag of CEFA in feed at 250 g per ton of feed led to a reduction of 6 tons of CO equivalent (CO eq) emitted along the life cycle of poultry production and 5 tons in the case of fattening pigs. The inclusion of this CEFA in the diet also led to a reduction in the land use footprint by 0.7 hectares and reductions in water consumption by 201 m and 82 m for broiler chicken and swine production, respectively. The environmental performance assessment thus showed the interest in using this CEFA in swine and broiler chicken diets to mitigate the environmental impacts.