Loading…
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revista brasileira de zootecnia 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.172-180 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-93c4f6b80cfe87cad318396352f27520c7360721e0d157e1686d354731b7724e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-93c4f6b80cfe87cad318396352f27520c7360721e0d157e1686d354731b7724e3 |
container_end_page | 180 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Revista brasileira de zootecnia |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Oliveira, Juliana Silva de Queiroz, Augusto César de Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana Detmann, Edenio Santos, Edson Mauro Silva, Thiago Carvalho da |
description | The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scielo_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_970fccccee77450c9ad27c5ffbaa8e74</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1516_35982012000100025</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_970fccccee77450c9ad27c5ffbaa8e74</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S1516_35982012000100025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-93c4f6b80cfe87cad318396352f27520c7360721e0d157e1686d354731b7724e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UclqwzAQNaWFpss3VD-QVItl2ccS0jYQ6KHLVcjyKFGwpSDZCfn7KkkJhdKBYdb3eMxk2QPBE8Ir_PhOOCnGjFclxYRijElyyi-y0Xlw-Su_zm5iXKcNwSo8ytxsq9pB9dY75A3arWCPDIQOXA8NqvdolpLgtdd6iMgo0HbokHVIexd96A_VzvYr9AW29Q7aVqGNCtshxbQVhs465frECY11y7vsyqg2wv1PvM0-n2cf09fx4u1lPn1ajHVOSD-umM5NUZdYGyiFVg0jJasKxqmhglOsBSuwoARwQ7gAUpRFw3guGKmFoDmw22x-4m28WstNsJ0Ke-mVlceGD0upknjdgqwENjoZgBA5x7pSDRWaG1MrVYLIE9fkxBW1hdbLtR-CS-Ll8fLyz-UTQJwAOvgYA5izAILl4Wf_Ir8B7HSIrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding</title><source>SciELO</source><creator>Oliveira, Juliana Silva de ; Queiroz, Augusto César de ; Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto ; Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana ; Detmann, Edenio ; Santos, Edson Mauro ; Silva, Thiago Carvalho da</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Juliana Silva de ; Queiroz, Augusto César de ; Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto ; Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana ; Detmann, Edenio ; Santos, Edson Mauro ; Silva, Thiago Carvalho da</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1516-3598</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1516-3598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE ; lactate ; organic acids ; propionic acid ; rumen ; VETERINARY SCIENCES</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de zootecnia, 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.172-180</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-93c4f6b80cfe87cad318396352f27520c7360721e0d157e1686d354731b7724e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-93c4f6b80cfe87cad318396352f27520c7360721e0d157e1686d354731b7724e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,24149,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Juliana Silva de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Augusto César de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Detmann, Edenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Edson Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Thiago Carvalho da</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding</title><title>Revista brasileira de zootecnia</title><addtitle>R. Bras. Zootec</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey.</description><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE</subject><subject>lactate</subject><subject>organic acids</subject><subject>propionic acid</subject><subject>rumen</subject><subject>VETERINARY SCIENCES</subject><issn>1516-3598</issn><issn>1806-9290</issn><issn>1516-3598</issn><issn>1806-9290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UclqwzAQNaWFpss3VD-QVItl2ccS0jYQ6KHLVcjyKFGwpSDZCfn7KkkJhdKBYdb3eMxk2QPBE8Ir_PhOOCnGjFclxYRijElyyi-y0Xlw-Su_zm5iXKcNwSo8ytxsq9pB9dY75A3arWCPDIQOXA8NqvdolpLgtdd6iMgo0HbokHVIexd96A_VzvYr9AW29Q7aVqGNCtshxbQVhs465frECY11y7vsyqg2wv1PvM0-n2cf09fx4u1lPn1ajHVOSD-umM5NUZdYGyiFVg0jJasKxqmhglOsBSuwoARwQ7gAUpRFw3guGKmFoDmw22x-4m28WstNsJ0Ke-mVlceGD0upknjdgqwENjoZgBA5x7pSDRWaG1MrVYLIE9fkxBW1hdbLtR-CS-Ll8fLyz-UTQJwAOvgYA5izAILl4Wf_Ir8B7HSIrg</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Oliveira, Juliana Silva de</creator><creator>Queiroz, Augusto César de</creator><creator>Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto</creator><creator>Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana</creator><creator>Detmann, Edenio</creator><creator>Santos, Edson Mauro</creator><creator>Silva, Thiago Carvalho da</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding</title><author>Oliveira, Juliana Silva de ; Queiroz, Augusto César de ; Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto ; Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana ; Detmann, Edenio ; Santos, Edson Mauro ; Silva, Thiago Carvalho da</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-93c4f6b80cfe87cad318396352f27520c7360721e0d157e1686d354731b7724e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE</topic><topic>lactate</topic><topic>organic acids</topic><topic>propionic acid</topic><topic>rumen</topic><topic>VETERINARY SCIENCES</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Juliana Silva de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Augusto César de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Detmann, Edenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Edson Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Thiago Carvalho da</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de zootecnia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliveira, Juliana Silva de</au><au>Queiroz, Augusto César de</au><au>Mantovani, Hilário Cuquetto</au><au>Bayão, Geraldo Fábio Viana</au><au>Detmann, Edenio</au><au>Santos, Edson Mauro</au><au>Silva, Thiago Carvalho da</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de zootecnia</jtitle><addtitle>R. Bras. Zootec</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>172-180</pages><issn>1516-3598</issn><issn>1806-9290</issn><eissn>1516-3598</eissn><eissn>1806-9290</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey.</abstract><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</pub><doi>10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1516-3598 |
ispartof | Revista brasileira de zootecnia, 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.172-180 |
issn | 1516-3598 1806-9290 1516-3598 1806-9290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_970fccccee77450c9ad27c5ffbaa8e74 |
source | SciELO |
subjects | AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE lactate organic acids propionic acid rumen VETERINARY SCIENCES |
title | Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A31%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20whey%20fermented%20by%20Enterococcus%20faecium%20in%20consortium%20with%20Veilonella%20parvula%20in%20ruminant%20feeding&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20zootecnia&rft.au=Oliveira,%20Juliana%20Silva%20de&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=172-180&rft.issn=1516-3598&rft.eissn=1516-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_doaj_%3ES1516_35982012000100025%3C/scielo_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-93c4f6b80cfe87cad318396352f27520c7360721e0d157e1686d354731b7724e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1516_35982012000100025&rfr_iscdi=true |