Development and early qualitative evidence of two novel patient-reported outcome instruments to assess daily functioning in people with early-stage Parkinson’s

• Published in: Journal of patient-reported outcomes 2023-04, Vol.7 (1), p.40-40, Article 40
• Main Authors: Morel, Thomas, Cleanthous, Sophie, Andrejack, John, Barker, Roger A., Biagioni, Milton, Blavat, Geraldine, Bloem, Bastiaan R., Boroojerdi, Babak, Brooks, William, Burns, Paul, Cano, Stefan, Gallagher, Casey, Gosden, Lesley, Siu, Carroll, Slagle, Ashley F., Ratcliffe, Natasha, Schroeder, Karlin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical outcome assessments; Clinical outcomes; Clinical trials; Early-stage Parkinson’s; Gait; Humans; Interviews; Measuring Patient Experiences: What Matters to You?; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Motor ability; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis; Parkinson's disease; Parkinson’s; Patient expert; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patient-reported outcome instrument; Qualitative evidence; Qualitative Research; Quality of Life Research; Research Design; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 2509-8020; 2509-8020
• DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00577-9

Background Previous research on concepts that are important to people living with early-stage Parkinson’s indicated that ‘ functional ’ slowness, fine motor skills, and subtle gait abnormalities are cardinal concepts that are not comprehensively captured by existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments that are used in clinical practice and research to assess symptoms and daily functioning within this patient population. We sought to develop novel PRO instruments to address this unmet need. Methods PRO instrument development was led by a multidisciplinary research group, including people living with Parkinson’s (termed ‘patient experts’), as well as patient engagement and involvement, regulatory science, clinical, and outcome measurement experts. A first set of PRO instruments, termed Early Parkinson’s Function Slowness (42 items) and Early Parkinson’s Mobility (26 items), were drafted to capture ‘ functional ’ slowness, fine motor skills, and subtle gait abnormalities. These PRO instruments were used in cognitive debriefing interviews with people living with early-stage Parkinson’s (who were not involved with the multidisciplinary research group) to identify issues with relevance, clarity, ease of completion, conceptual overlap, or missing concepts. Results Sixty people living with early-stage Parkinson’s were interviewed, which led to refining the items to 45 for the Early Parkinson’s Functional Slowness and 23 for the Early Parkinson’s Mobility PRO instruments. Refinement included rewording items to address clarity issues, merging or splitting items to address overlap issues, and adding new items to address missing concepts. The Early Parkinson’s Function Slowness PRO instrument resulted in a multidimensional instrument covering upper limb, complex/whole body, general activity, and cognitive functional slowness. The Early Parkinson’s Mobility PRO instrument resulted in comprehensive coverage of everyday mobility tasks, with a focus on gait concepts, plus complex/whole body, balance, and lower limb mobility. Conclusions The Early Parkinson’s Function Slowness and Early Parkinson’s Mobility PRO instruments aim to address gaps in existing PRO instruments to measure meaningful symptoms and daily functioning in people living with early-stage Parkinson’s. Utilizing a meticulous study design led by a multidisciplinary research group that included patient experts helped to ensure that the PRO instruments were patient-centric, content valid, and meaningful