Addressing abdominal trauma from conflict and warfare in under‐resourced regions: A critical narrative review

• Published in: Health science reports 2024-10, Vol.7 (10), p.e70151-n/a
• Main Authors: Awuah, Wireko Andrew, Tan, Joecelyn Kirani, Shah, Muhammad Hamza, Ahluwalia, Arjun, Roy, Sakshi, Ali, Syed Hasham, Ferreira, Tomas, Bharadwaj, Hareesha Rishab, Adebusoye, Favour Tope, Aderinto, Nicholas, Mazzoleni, Adele, Abdul‐Rahman, Toufik, Ovechkin, Denys
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen; abdominal surgery; abdominal trauma; Case reports; Comorbidity; conflict; emergency care; Firearms; Global surgery; Hemorrhage; Inclusion; Industrialized nations; Injuries; low and middle‐income countries; Medical personnel; Mortality; Narrative Review; Patients; Pediatrics; Robbery; Surgeons; Trauma; Trauma care; War
• ISSN: 2398-8835; 2398-8835
• DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70151

Introduction The prevalence of abdominal injuries in war and conflict zones, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), presents a significant healthcare challenge. These injuries, often resulting from explosive devices, firearms, and shrapnel, lead to high morbidity and mortality rates due to delayed diagnoses, inadequate medical infrastructure, and limited access to specialised care. This review aims to summarise the literature on conflict‐related abdominal injuries in LMICs, highlighting the impact of such trauma on healthcare systems and patient outcomes, and suggesting strategies for improvement. Methods A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, focusing on studies from contemporary and historical conflict‐ridden nations. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using specific keywords. Inclusion criteria encompassed various study designs and both paediatric and adult populations, with studies providing raw data prioritised. Exclusions included non‐English articles, non‐peer‐reviewed studies, and those not reporting outcomes or involving high‐income countries. Results The review identified significant challenges in managing war‐related abdominal trauma in LMICs, including a shortage of healthcare personnel and infrastructure, socio‐political barriers, and research gaps. Clinical implications of such injuries include elevated mortality rates, with surgical and nonsurgical management outcomes varying significantly. Positive advancements in diagnostics and surgical techniques have improved survival rates, yet the need for further infrastructural and workforce enhancements remains critical. Conclusion Abdominal trauma in conflict‐affected LMICs necessitates focused efforts to improve healthcare delivery, including targeted funding for infrastructure and equipment, development of training programs for trauma specialists, and increased humanitarian aid. Bridging research gaps and fostering collaborative efforts are essential for advancing the management of abdominal trauma and enhancing patient outcomes in these challenging environments.