Loading…
Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog-Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs
When pre-treated with social stimuli prior to testing, dogs are more susceptible to human influence in a food preference task. This means, after a positive social interaction they are more willing to choose the smaller amount of food indicated by the human, as opposed to their baseline preference fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2024-03, Vol.19 (3), p.e0300889-e0300889 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-ed39d48e7ce5e608b40b9558542fa91a50e6c5ecef25868863ef50dbb58555da3 |
container_end_page | e0300889 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0300889 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Kis, Anna Tóth, Katinka Langner, Lívia Topál, József |
description | When pre-treated with social stimuli prior to testing, dogs are more susceptible to human influence in a food preference task. This means, after a positive social interaction they are more willing to choose the smaller amount of food indicated by the human, as opposed to their baseline preference for the bigger amount. In the current study we investigate if and how various forms of social interaction modulate choices in the same social susceptibility task, testing dogs with varying early life history (pet dogs, therapy dogs, former shelter dogs). In line with previous studies, dogs in general were found to be susceptible to human influence as reflected in the reduced number of "bigger" choices in the human influence, compared to baseline, trials. This was true not only for pet dogs with a normal life history, but also for dogs adopted from a shelter. Therapy dogs, however, did not uniformly change their preference for the bigger quantity of food in the human influence trials; they only did so if prior to testing they had been pre-treated with social stimuli by their owner (but not by a stranger). Pet dogs were also more influenced after pre-treatment with social stimuli by their owner compared to ignoring and separation; however after pre-treatment by a stranger their behaviour did not differ from ignoring and separation. Former shelter dogs on the other hand were equally influenced regardless of pre-treatment by owner versus stranger. In summary these results show that dogs' social susceptibility is modulated by both interactions immediately preceding the test as well as by long term social experiences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0300889 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_97e46e3a21e249c8a28f49f75b3f772c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A787019968</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_97e46e3a21e249c8a28f49f75b3f772c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A787019968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-ed39d48e7ce5e608b40b9558542fa91a50e6c5ecef25868863ef50dbb58555da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkmuL3CAUhkNp6W63_QelCIVeoDM1MSb6qQzbyw4sLPT2VYw5ZhxMnFWzdP5If2-dS5cJ9EPxg3p83hc5582y5zme56TO36_d6Adp5xs3wBwTjBnjD7LznJNiVhWYPDw5n2VPQlhjTAmrqsfZGWE0L3henWe_P7ouvEbBKSMtCmNQsImmMdbELTIBtUZr8DDE9Gy3SKabitCiZovupDduTIjrZldjLwdkhgheqmjcEOZogUIc2y1yA9KyN0mdyPAOaed78CiswCZ8X0RyaFFcJfHmQD3NHmlpAzw77hfZj8-fvl9eza5vviwvF9czRTmOM2gJb0sGtQIKFWZNiRtOKaNloSXPJcVQKQoKdEFZxVhFQFPcNk1CKG0luciWB9_WybXYeNNLvxVOGrEvON8J6aNRFgSvoayAyCKHouSKyYLpkuuaNkTXdaGS14eD12ZsemhVapqXdmI6fRnMSnTuTuSY04rROjm8OTp4dztCiKI3aSDWygFSp0XB6xKnQdd5Ql8e0E6mv5lBu2SpdrhY1KzGOecVS9T8H1RaLfRGpeBok-oTwduJIDERfsVOjiGI5bev_8_e_Jyyr07YFUgbV8HZcR-VKVgeQOVdCB70ff9yLHa5F8fci13uxTH3SfbitPf3or9BJ38A648CPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2974000871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog-Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Kis, Anna ; Tóth, Katinka ; Langner, Lívia ; Topál, József</creator><contributor>Olsson, I. Anna S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kis, Anna ; Tóth, Katinka ; Langner, Lívia ; Topál, József ; Olsson, I. Anna S.</creatorcontrib><description>When pre-treated with social stimuli prior to testing, dogs are more susceptible to human influence in a food preference task. This means, after a positive social interaction they are more willing to choose the smaller amount of food indicated by the human, as opposed to their baseline preference for the bigger amount. In the current study we investigate if and how various forms of social interaction modulate choices in the same social susceptibility task, testing dogs with varying early life history (pet dogs, therapy dogs, former shelter dogs). In line with previous studies, dogs in general were found to be susceptible to human influence as reflected in the reduced number of "bigger" choices in the human influence, compared to baseline, trials. This was true not only for pet dogs with a normal life history, but also for dogs adopted from a shelter. Therapy dogs, however, did not uniformly change their preference for the bigger quantity of food in the human influence trials; they only did so if prior to testing they had been pre-treated with social stimuli by their owner (but not by a stranger). Pet dogs were also more influenced after pre-treatment with social stimuli by their owner compared to ignoring and separation; however after pre-treatment by a stranger their behaviour did not differ from ignoring and separation. Former shelter dogs on the other hand were equally influenced regardless of pre-treatment by owner versus stranger. In summary these results show that dogs' social susceptibility is modulated by both interactions immediately preceding the test as well as by long term social experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300889</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38512916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Dogs ; Domestication ; Evaluation ; Family ; Food ; Food habits ; Food Preferences ; Human-Animal Bond ; Humans ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Pets ; Social aspects ; Social Sciences ; Therapy Animals</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-03, Vol.19 (3), p.e0300889-e0300889</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Kis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Kis et al 2024 Kis et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-ed39d48e7ce5e608b40b9558542fa91a50e6c5ecef25868863ef50dbb58555da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8728-4795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956857/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956857/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,36994,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38512916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Olsson, I. Anna S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kis, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tóth, Katinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langner, Lívia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topál, József</creatorcontrib><title>Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog-Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>When pre-treated with social stimuli prior to testing, dogs are more susceptible to human influence in a food preference task. This means, after a positive social interaction they are more willing to choose the smaller amount of food indicated by the human, as opposed to their baseline preference for the bigger amount. In the current study we investigate if and how various forms of social interaction modulate choices in the same social susceptibility task, testing dogs with varying early life history (pet dogs, therapy dogs, former shelter dogs). In line with previous studies, dogs in general were found to be susceptible to human influence as reflected in the reduced number of "bigger" choices in the human influence, compared to baseline, trials. This was true not only for pet dogs with a normal life history, but also for dogs adopted from a shelter. Therapy dogs, however, did not uniformly change their preference for the bigger quantity of food in the human influence trials; they only did so if prior to testing they had been pre-treated with social stimuli by their owner (but not by a stranger). Pet dogs were also more influenced after pre-treatment with social stimuli by their owner compared to ignoring and separation; however after pre-treatment by a stranger their behaviour did not differ from ignoring and separation. Former shelter dogs on the other hand were equally influenced regardless of pre-treatment by owner versus stranger. In summary these results show that dogs' social susceptibility is modulated by both interactions immediately preceding the test as well as by long term social experiences.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Domestication</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food habits</subject><subject>Food Preferences</subject><subject>Human-Animal Bond</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Pets</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Therapy Animals</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkmuL3CAUhkNp6W63_QelCIVeoDM1MSb6qQzbyw4sLPT2VYw5ZhxMnFWzdP5If2-dS5cJ9EPxg3p83hc5582y5zme56TO36_d6Adp5xs3wBwTjBnjD7LznJNiVhWYPDw5n2VPQlhjTAmrqsfZGWE0L3henWe_P7ouvEbBKSMtCmNQsImmMdbELTIBtUZr8DDE9Gy3SKabitCiZovupDduTIjrZldjLwdkhgheqmjcEOZogUIc2y1yA9KyN0mdyPAOaed78CiswCZ8X0RyaFFcJfHmQD3NHmlpAzw77hfZj8-fvl9eza5vviwvF9czRTmOM2gJb0sGtQIKFWZNiRtOKaNloSXPJcVQKQoKdEFZxVhFQFPcNk1CKG0luciWB9_WybXYeNNLvxVOGrEvON8J6aNRFgSvoayAyCKHouSKyYLpkuuaNkTXdaGS14eD12ZsemhVapqXdmI6fRnMSnTuTuSY04rROjm8OTp4dztCiKI3aSDWygFSp0XB6xKnQdd5Ql8e0E6mv5lBu2SpdrhY1KzGOecVS9T8H1RaLfRGpeBok-oTwduJIDERfsVOjiGI5bev_8_e_Jyyr07YFUgbV8HZcR-VKVgeQOVdCB70ff9yLHa5F8fci13uxTH3SfbitPf3or9BJ38A648CPA</recordid><startdate>20240321</startdate><enddate>20240321</enddate><creator>Kis, Anna</creator><creator>Tóth, Katinka</creator><creator>Langner, Lívia</creator><creator>Topál, József</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8728-4795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240321</creationdate><title>Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog-Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs</title><author>Kis, Anna ; Tóth, Katinka ; Langner, Lívia ; Topál, József</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-ed39d48e7ce5e608b40b9558542fa91a50e6c5ecef25868863ef50dbb58555da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Domestication</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food habits</topic><topic>Food Preferences</topic><topic>Human-Animal Bond</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Pets</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Therapy Animals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kis, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tóth, Katinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langner, Lívia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topál, József</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kis, Anna</au><au>Tóth, Katinka</au><au>Langner, Lívia</au><au>Topál, József</au><au>Olsson, I. Anna S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog-Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-03-21</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0300889</spage><epage>e0300889</epage><pages>e0300889-e0300889</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>When pre-treated with social stimuli prior to testing, dogs are more susceptible to human influence in a food preference task. This means, after a positive social interaction they are more willing to choose the smaller amount of food indicated by the human, as opposed to their baseline preference for the bigger amount. In the current study we investigate if and how various forms of social interaction modulate choices in the same social susceptibility task, testing dogs with varying early life history (pet dogs, therapy dogs, former shelter dogs). In line with previous studies, dogs in general were found to be susceptible to human influence as reflected in the reduced number of "bigger" choices in the human influence, compared to baseline, trials. This was true not only for pet dogs with a normal life history, but also for dogs adopted from a shelter. Therapy dogs, however, did not uniformly change their preference for the bigger quantity of food in the human influence trials; they only did so if prior to testing they had been pre-treated with social stimuli by their owner (but not by a stranger). Pet dogs were also more influenced after pre-treatment with social stimuli by their owner compared to ignoring and separation; however after pre-treatment by a stranger their behaviour did not differ from ignoring and separation. Former shelter dogs on the other hand were equally influenced regardless of pre-treatment by owner versus stranger. In summary these results show that dogs' social susceptibility is modulated by both interactions immediately preceding the test as well as by long term social experiences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38512916</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0300889</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8728-4795</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2024-03, Vol.19 (3), p.e0300889-e0300889 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_97e46e3a21e249c8a28f49f75b3f772c |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Animals Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Dogs Domestication Evaluation Family Food Food habits Food Preferences Human-Animal Bond Humans Medicine and Health Sciences Pets Social aspects Social Sciences Therapy Animals |
title | Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog-Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A22%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dogs'%20social%20susceptibility%20is%20differentially%20affected%20by%20various%20dog-Human%20interactions.%20A%20study%20on%20family%20dogs,%20former%20shelter%20dogs%20and%20therapy%20dogs&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kis,%20Anna&rft.date=2024-03-21&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0300889&rft.epage=e0300889&rft.pages=e0300889-e0300889&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0300889&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA787019968%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-ed39d48e7ce5e608b40b9558542fa91a50e6c5ecef25868863ef50dbb58555da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2974000871&rft_id=info:pmid/38512916&rft_galeid=A787019968&rfr_iscdi=true |