Loading…

A comparison of various methods for measuring breast density and breast tissue composition in adolescent girls and women

This study compared different approaches to measuring breast density and breast tissue composition (BTC) in adolescent girls (n = 42, aged 14–16 years) and their mothers (n = 39, aged 36–61 years) from a cohort in Santiago, Chile. Optical spectroscopy (OS) was used to measure collagen, water, and li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2022-08, Vol.12 (1), p.13547-13547, Article 13547
Main Authors: Kehm, Rebecca D., Walter, E. Jane, Pereira, Ana, White, Melissa L., Oskar, Sabine, Michels, Karin B., Shepherd, John A., Lilge, Lothar, Terry, Mary Beth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study compared different approaches to measuring breast density and breast tissue composition (BTC) in adolescent girls (n = 42, aged 14–16 years) and their mothers (n = 39, aged 36–61 years) from a cohort in Santiago, Chile. Optical spectroscopy (OS) was used to measure collagen, water, and lipid concentrations, which were combined into a percent breast density index (%BDI). A clinical dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) system calibrated to measure breast density provided percent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from manually delineated images. After digitizing mammogram films, the percent mammographic breast density (%MBD) was measured using computer-assisted software. Partial correlation coefficients ( r partial ) were used to evaluate associations between breast density measures and BTC from these three different measurement approaches, adjusting for age and body mass index. %BDI from OS was associated with %FGV from DXA in adolescent girls ( r partial  = 0.46, p -value = 0.003), but not in mothers ( r partial  = 0.17, p -value = 0.32). In mothers, %FGV from DXA was associated with %MBD from mammograms ( r partial  = 0.60, p -value 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-17800-0