Loading…

Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy

Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sigh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20527-20527, Article 20527
Main Authors: Asseo, Kim, Fierro, Fabrizio, Slavutsky, Yuli, Frasnelli, Johannes, Niv, Masha Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463
container_end_page 20527
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20527
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 10
creator Asseo, Kim
Fierro, Fabrizio
Slavutsky, Yuli
Frasnelli, Johannes
Niv, Masha Y.
description Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_990185c808b1440cb4814702f131ee30</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_990185c808b1440cb4814702f131ee30</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2464605547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAdkiQuXlLHHdpwLElpoWalSLwWOluPMplmycbETpP57vE0pLQd88ce8eTNv_IriNYdTDmjeJ8lVbUoQUFYVcl3is-JYgFSlQCGePzofFScp7SAvJWrJ65fFEaLAWis4Lr5fRed_9GPH1pffNp9KXrM5Ha6TSxMxN7Ys7WkY2BBSYuchdAOxRC76a0qsT2wME3Ms0tC75hCaopuou31VvNi6IdHJ_b4qvp59vlp_KS8uzzfrjxelV8ZMJbZbv62gEoDkpARCVOgkoAfpRCOorqUBochpFLzRugYhsVWNbJEaqXFVbBbeNridvYn93sVbG1xv7x5C7KyLU-8HsnUN3ChvwDQ8l_KNNFxWILYcORFC5vqwcN3MzZ5aT2MWMzwhfRoZ-2vbhV-20ia3WWWCd_cEMfycKU123yefp-dGCnOyQmqpQSl5gL79B7oLcxzzqDKqQgFcZ6GrQiwoH_P4I20fmuFgDzawiw1stoG9s4HFnPTmsYyHlD-fngG4AFIOjR3Fv7X_Q_sbHFK6SA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473201624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Asseo, Kim ; Fierro, Fabrizio ; Slavutsky, Yuli ; Frasnelli, Johannes ; Niv, Masha Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Asseo, Kim ; Fierro, Fabrizio ; Slavutsky, Yuli ; Frasnelli, Johannes ; Niv, Masha Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33239650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/700 ; 692/700/478 ; 692/700/478/174 ; Ageusia - epidemiology ; Anosmia - epidemiology ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - physiopathology ; COVID-19 - virology ; Epidemiological Monitoring ; Health risks ; Hearing loss ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Incidence ; Information Dissemination - methods ; Italy - epidemiology ; multidisciplinary ; Olfaction ; Pandemics ; Public health ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Search Engine - methods ; Smell ; Social Media ; Taste ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20527-20527, Article 20527</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473201624/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473201624?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asseo, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fierro, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slavutsky, Yuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frasnelli, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Masha Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats.</description><subject>692/700</subject><subject>692/700/478</subject><subject>692/700/478/174</subject><subject>Ageusia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anosmia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - physiopathology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - virology</subject><subject>Epidemiological Monitoring</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Information Dissemination - methods</subject><subject>Italy - epidemiology</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Olfaction</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Search Engine - methods</subject><subject>Smell</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAdkiQuXlLHHdpwLElpoWalSLwWOluPMplmycbETpP57vE0pLQd88ce8eTNv_IriNYdTDmjeJ8lVbUoQUFYVcl3is-JYgFSlQCGePzofFScp7SAvJWrJ65fFEaLAWis4Lr5fRed_9GPH1pffNp9KXrM5Ha6TSxMxN7Ys7WkY2BBSYuchdAOxRC76a0qsT2wME3Ms0tC75hCaopuou31VvNi6IdHJ_b4qvp59vlp_KS8uzzfrjxelV8ZMJbZbv62gEoDkpARCVOgkoAfpRCOorqUBochpFLzRugYhsVWNbJEaqXFVbBbeNridvYn93sVbG1xv7x5C7KyLU-8HsnUN3ChvwDQ8l_KNNFxWILYcORFC5vqwcN3MzZ5aT2MWMzwhfRoZ-2vbhV-20ia3WWWCd_cEMfycKU123yefp-dGCnOyQmqpQSl5gL79B7oLcxzzqDKqQgFcZ6GrQiwoH_P4I20fmuFgDzawiw1stoG9s4HFnPTmsYyHlD-fngG4AFIOjR3Fv7X_Q_sbHFK6SA</recordid><startdate>20201125</startdate><enddate>20201125</enddate><creator>Asseo, Kim</creator><creator>Fierro, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Slavutsky, Yuli</creator><creator>Frasnelli, Johannes</creator><creator>Niv, Masha Y.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201125</creationdate><title>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</title><author>Asseo, Kim ; Fierro, Fabrizio ; Slavutsky, Yuli ; Frasnelli, Johannes ; Niv, Masha Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>692/700</topic><topic>692/700/478</topic><topic>692/700/478/174</topic><topic>Ageusia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anosmia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - physiopathology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - virology</topic><topic>Epidemiological Monitoring</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Information Dissemination - methods</topic><topic>Italy - epidemiology</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Olfaction</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Search Engine - methods</topic><topic>Smell</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asseo, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fierro, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slavutsky, Yuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frasnelli, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Masha Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asseo, Kim</au><au>Fierro, Fabrizio</au><au>Slavutsky, Yuli</au><au>Frasnelli, Johannes</au><au>Niv, Masha Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2020-11-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20527</spage><epage>20527</epage><pages>20527-20527</pages><artnum>20527</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>33239650</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20527-20527, Article 20527
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_990185c808b1440cb4814702f131ee30
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 692/700
692/700/478
692/700/478/174
Ageusia - epidemiology
Anosmia - epidemiology
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
COVID-19 - physiopathology
COVID-19 - virology
Epidemiological Monitoring
Health risks
Hearing loss
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Incidence
Information Dissemination - methods
Italy - epidemiology
multidisciplinary
Olfaction
Pandemics
Public health
SARS-CoV-2
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Search Engine - methods
Smell
Social Media
Taste
United States - epidemiology
title Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracking%20COVID-19%20using%20taste%20and%20smell%20loss%20Google%20searches%20is%20not%20a%20reliable%20strategy&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Asseo,%20Kim&rft.date=2020-11-25&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20527&rft.epage=20527&rft.pages=20527-20527&rft.artnum=20527&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2464605547%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473201624&rft_id=info:pmid/33239650&rfr_iscdi=true