Loading…
Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy
Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sigh...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20527-20527, Article 20527 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463 |
container_end_page | 20527 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20527 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Asseo, Kim Fierro, Fabrizio Slavutsky, Yuli Frasnelli, Johannes Niv, Masha Y. |
description | Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_990185c808b1440cb4814702f131ee30</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_990185c808b1440cb4814702f131ee30</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2464605547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAdkiQuXlLHHdpwLElpoWalSLwWOluPMplmycbETpP57vE0pLQd88ce8eTNv_IriNYdTDmjeJ8lVbUoQUFYVcl3is-JYgFSlQCGePzofFScp7SAvJWrJ65fFEaLAWis4Lr5fRed_9GPH1pffNp9KXrM5Ha6TSxMxN7Ys7WkY2BBSYuchdAOxRC76a0qsT2wME3Ms0tC75hCaopuou31VvNi6IdHJ_b4qvp59vlp_KS8uzzfrjxelV8ZMJbZbv62gEoDkpARCVOgkoAfpRCOorqUBochpFLzRugYhsVWNbJEaqXFVbBbeNridvYn93sVbG1xv7x5C7KyLU-8HsnUN3ChvwDQ8l_KNNFxWILYcORFC5vqwcN3MzZ5aT2MWMzwhfRoZ-2vbhV-20ia3WWWCd_cEMfycKU123yefp-dGCnOyQmqpQSl5gL79B7oLcxzzqDKqQgFcZ6GrQiwoH_P4I20fmuFgDzawiw1stoG9s4HFnPTmsYyHlD-fngG4AFIOjR3Fv7X_Q_sbHFK6SA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473201624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Asseo, Kim ; Fierro, Fabrizio ; Slavutsky, Yuli ; Frasnelli, Johannes ; Niv, Masha Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Asseo, Kim ; Fierro, Fabrizio ; Slavutsky, Yuli ; Frasnelli, Johannes ; Niv, Masha Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33239650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/700 ; 692/700/478 ; 692/700/478/174 ; Ageusia - epidemiology ; Anosmia - epidemiology ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - physiopathology ; COVID-19 - virology ; Epidemiological Monitoring ; Health risks ; Hearing loss ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Incidence ; Information Dissemination - methods ; Italy - epidemiology ; multidisciplinary ; Olfaction ; Pandemics ; Public health ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Search Engine - methods ; Smell ; Social Media ; Taste ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20527-20527, Article 20527</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473201624/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473201624?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asseo, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fierro, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slavutsky, Yuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frasnelli, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Masha Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats.</description><subject>692/700</subject><subject>692/700/478</subject><subject>692/700/478/174</subject><subject>Ageusia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anosmia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - physiopathology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - virology</subject><subject>Epidemiological Monitoring</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Information Dissemination - methods</subject><subject>Italy - epidemiology</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Olfaction</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Search Engine - methods</subject><subject>Smell</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAdkiQuXlLHHdpwLElpoWalSLwWOluPMplmycbETpP57vE0pLQd88ce8eTNv_IriNYdTDmjeJ8lVbUoQUFYVcl3is-JYgFSlQCGePzofFScp7SAvJWrJ65fFEaLAWis4Lr5fRed_9GPH1pffNp9KXrM5Ha6TSxMxN7Ys7WkY2BBSYuchdAOxRC76a0qsT2wME3Ms0tC75hCaopuou31VvNi6IdHJ_b4qvp59vlp_KS8uzzfrjxelV8ZMJbZbv62gEoDkpARCVOgkoAfpRCOorqUBochpFLzRugYhsVWNbJEaqXFVbBbeNridvYn93sVbG1xv7x5C7KyLU-8HsnUN3ChvwDQ8l_KNNFxWILYcORFC5vqwcN3MzZ5aT2MWMzwhfRoZ-2vbhV-20ia3WWWCd_cEMfycKU123yefp-dGCnOyQmqpQSl5gL79B7oLcxzzqDKqQgFcZ6GrQiwoH_P4I20fmuFgDzawiw1stoG9s4HFnPTmsYyHlD-fngG4AFIOjR3Fv7X_Q_sbHFK6SA</recordid><startdate>20201125</startdate><enddate>20201125</enddate><creator>Asseo, Kim</creator><creator>Fierro, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Slavutsky, Yuli</creator><creator>Frasnelli, Johannes</creator><creator>Niv, Masha Y.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201125</creationdate><title>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</title><author>Asseo, Kim ; Fierro, Fabrizio ; Slavutsky, Yuli ; Frasnelli, Johannes ; Niv, Masha Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>692/700</topic><topic>692/700/478</topic><topic>692/700/478/174</topic><topic>Ageusia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anosmia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - physiopathology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - virology</topic><topic>Epidemiological Monitoring</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Information Dissemination - methods</topic><topic>Italy - epidemiology</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Olfaction</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Search Engine - methods</topic><topic>Smell</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asseo, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fierro, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slavutsky, Yuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frasnelli, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Masha Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asseo, Kim</au><au>Fierro, Fabrizio</au><au>Slavutsky, Yuli</au><au>Frasnelli, Johannes</au><au>Niv, Masha Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2020-11-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20527</spage><epage>20527</epage><pages>20527-20527</pages><artnum>20527</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Web search tools are widely used by the general public to obtain health-related information, and analysis of search data is often suggested for public health monitoring. We analyzed popularity of searches related to smell loss and taste loss, recently listed as symptoms of COVID-19. Searches on sight loss and hearing loss, which are not considered as COVID-19 symptoms, were used as control. Google Trends results per region in Italy or state in the US were compared to COVID-19 incidence in the corresponding geographical areas. The COVID-19 incidence did not correlate with searches for non-symptoms, but in some weeks had high correlation with taste and smell loss searches, which also correlated with each other. Correlation of the sensory symptoms with new COVID-19 cases for each country as a whole was high at some time points, but decreased (Italy) or dramatically fluctuated over time (US). Smell loss searches correlated with the incidence of media reports in the US. Our results show that popularity of symptom searches is not reliable for pandemic monitoring. Awareness of this limitation is important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to spread and to exhibit new clinical manifestations, and for potential future health threats.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>33239650</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20527-20527, Article 20527 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_990185c808b1440cb4814702f131ee30 |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 692/700 692/700/478 692/700/478/174 Ageusia - epidemiology Anosmia - epidemiology Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - physiopathology COVID-19 - virology Epidemiological Monitoring Health risks Hearing loss Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Incidence Information Dissemination - methods Italy - epidemiology multidisciplinary Olfaction Pandemics Public health SARS-CoV-2 Science Science (multidisciplinary) Search Engine - methods Smell Social Media Taste United States - epidemiology |
title | Tracking COVID-19 using taste and smell loss Google searches is not a reliable strategy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracking%20COVID-19%20using%20taste%20and%20smell%20loss%20Google%20searches%20is%20not%20a%20reliable%20strategy&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Asseo,%20Kim&rft.date=2020-11-25&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20527&rft.epage=20527&rft.pages=20527-20527&rft.artnum=20527&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-020-77316-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2464605547%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-3dfcf707203ea440e3353a403c04a2b2e9948025ea6321b6690243d5b4d3eb463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473201624&rft_id=info:pmid/33239650&rfr_iscdi=true |