Oilseed Rape Yield Performance in the Clearfield® System under Varying Management Intensities

• Published in: Agronomy (Basel) 2021-12, Vol.11 (12), p.2551
• Main Authors: Schwabe, Sebastian, Gruber, Sabine, Claupein, Wilhelm
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural production; canola; Competition; Crop rotation; Crop yield; Experiments; grain yield; herbicide tolerant; Herbicides; imazamox; imidazolinone; Oilseeds; Planting density; Plows; Rape plants; Rapeseed; Row width; Seeds; Soils; Statistical analysis; Strip; Tillage; Volunteers; weed emergence/control; Weeds; Wheat; Winter
• ISSN: 2073-4395; 2073-4395
• DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11122551

Oilseed rape production is under pressure due to a limited availability of herbicides. Therefore, the performance in terms of management intensity (MI) and herbicide strategy (HS) and the involved yield formation was evaluated in a two-year Clearfield® oilseed rape field experiment. Furthermore, weed density and weed composition were also investigated. The variants of MI were standard sowing density (StS; seed rate: 50 seeds m−2, primary tillage: plow, row width: 12 cm), reduced sowing density (RD; seed rate: 25 seeds m−2, primary tillage: plow, row width: 50 cm), and strip-till (ST; seed rate: 25 seeds m−2, primary tillage: strip tillage, row width: 50 cm). The variants of HS were preemergence strategy (PES; application of dimethachlor, napropamide, clomazone in preemergence and application of prapaquizafop in postemergence) and Clearfield® strategy (CLS; application of imazamox, quinmerac in preemergence, no postemergence herbicide application). In the first year of the trial, there were no interactions between the factors in terms of grain yield. Grain yield in StS was 3.85 t and 5.2% significantly lower than in ST, and the value of RD was not significantly different from StS and ST. Grain yield in CLS was 3.7 t and 2.7% lower than in PES. In the second year of the trial, the grain yield in ST CLS was significantly lower, and there were no significant differences between the other variants. Higher weed emergence was observed in CLS RD (2.7 to 4 times higher weed density compared to PES RD) and CLS ST (2.8 to 4.5 times higher weed density compared to PES ST). No significant differences existed between StS PES and StS CLS in both trial years. The Clearfield® system offers significant advantages in the control of cruciferous weeds. Although these did not occur on the trial fields, the Clearfield® system in this study showed to be an alternative to the more common pre-emergence system, especially with regard to the parameter grain yield.