Loading…

Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus to the Conventional Diagnostic Methods in Determining the Microbiological Etiology of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a substantial public health issue that is associated with high mortality rates and is complicated by an arsenal of microbial etiologies, expressing multidrug-resistant phenotypes, rendering relatively limited therapeutic options. BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-02, Vol.11 (3), p.377
Main Authors: Kamel, Noha A, Alshahrani, Mohammad Y, Aboshanab, Khaled M, El Borhamy, Mervat I
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-78a91176af038c211de3db6cd2609086da8d1ab5ed2ed4971342c50bbb07f8423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-78a91176af038c211de3db6cd2609086da8d1ab5ed2ed4971342c50bbb07f8423
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 377
container_title Biology (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 11
creator Kamel, Noha A
Alshahrani, Mohammad Y
Aboshanab, Khaled M
El Borhamy, Mervat I
description Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a substantial public health issue that is associated with high mortality rates and is complicated by an arsenal of microbial etiologies, expressing multidrug-resistant phenotypes, rendering relatively limited therapeutic options. BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus (BFPP) is a simple multiplexed PCR system that integrates sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and analysis of microbial etiology, with a turnaround time of about one hour. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP is simpler, easier to perform, and can simultaneously detect the most common pathogens involved in lower respiratory tract infections (34 targets). Accordingly, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the multiplexed BFPP for the rapid detection of 27 clinically relevant respiratory pathogens and 7 genetic markers among 50 HAP cases admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), who submitted mini-bronchoalveolar (mBAL) specimens. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP showed an overall sensitivity of 100% [95% CI; 90-100] and overall specificity of 90% [95% CI; 87.4-92.5] among all the tested bacterial targets. BFPP identified 11 viral targets (22%) among the tested specimens. The BFPP semi-quantitative analysis showed a concordance rate of 47.4% among positive culture specimens. For the investigation of the antibiotic resistance genes, BFPP showed a positive percent agreement (PPA), a negative percent agreement (NPA), and an overall percent agreement (OPA), reaching 97% [95% CI; 90-100], 95% [95% CI; 91.5-97], and 95% [95% CI; 93-97], respectively, with standard antibiotic sensitivity testing. In conclusion, BFPP has the potential to enhance the rapid microbiological diagnosis of HAP cases, and could aid in tailoring appropriate antibiotic therapies.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/biology11030377
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99462506bcbd4365a2b481da5eeace8b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_99462506bcbd4365a2b481da5eeace8b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2642341847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-78a91176af038c211de3db6cd2609086da8d1ab5ed2ed4971342c50bbb07f8423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks1uGyEUhUdVqyZKs-6uQuqmm2lgYIDZVHIdu4mUqF60a8SfbSwGHJix5FfqUxbbaZpkNozgO4dzubeqPiL4FeMOXikXfVztEYIYYsbeVOcNZF3NGGZvn_2fVZc5b2D5GGwopu-rM9xiTFmLzqs_s530oxxcDCAuwbC24LuLc5csmDvfT1KSe7AIduxjcBIsZLAeLPyYwRCP9DSGnQ0HvfTg2slViHlwGtzbYR1NBi6AazvY1LvgwuoouXc6xVN4p4tqNpwKOQS4iXnrBunriX4YSwrz__IP1bul9NlePq4X1e_57Nf0pr77-eN2OrmrNeFsqBmXHUKMyiXEXDcIGYuNoto0FHaQUyO5QVK11jTWkI4hTBrdQqUUZEtOGnxR3Z58TZQbsU2ul2kvonTiuBHTSshUSvRWdB2hTQup0soQTFvZKMKRka21Uluuite3k9d2VL01urxUkv6F6cuT4NZiFXeCd6RFmBaDL48GKT6MNg-id1lb70sj4phFQwmBiHOMCvr5FbqJYyptOVINJogTVqirE1V6kHOyy6cwCIrDWIlXY1UUn57X8MT_GyL8FxKSzbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642341847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus to the Conventional Diagnostic Methods in Determining the Microbiological Etiology of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Kamel, Noha A ; Alshahrani, Mohammad Y ; Aboshanab, Khaled M ; El Borhamy, Mervat I</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamel, Noha A ; Alshahrani, Mohammad Y ; Aboshanab, Khaled M ; El Borhamy, Mervat I</creatorcontrib><description>Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a substantial public health issue that is associated with high mortality rates and is complicated by an arsenal of microbial etiologies, expressing multidrug-resistant phenotypes, rendering relatively limited therapeutic options. BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus (BFPP) is a simple multiplexed PCR system that integrates sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and analysis of microbial etiology, with a turnaround time of about one hour. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP is simpler, easier to perform, and can simultaneously detect the most common pathogens involved in lower respiratory tract infections (34 targets). Accordingly, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the multiplexed BFPP for the rapid detection of 27 clinically relevant respiratory pathogens and 7 genetic markers among 50 HAP cases admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), who submitted mini-bronchoalveolar (mBAL) specimens. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP showed an overall sensitivity of 100% [95% CI; 90-100] and overall specificity of 90% [95% CI; 87.4-92.5] among all the tested bacterial targets. BFPP identified 11 viral targets (22%) among the tested specimens. The BFPP semi-quantitative analysis showed a concordance rate of 47.4% among positive culture specimens. For the investigation of the antibiotic resistance genes, BFPP showed a positive percent agreement (PPA), a negative percent agreement (NPA), and an overall percent agreement (OPA), reaching 97% [95% CI; 90-100], 95% [95% CI; 91.5-97], and 95% [95% CI; 93-97], respectively, with standard antibiotic sensitivity testing. In conclusion, BFPP has the potential to enhance the rapid microbiological diagnosis of HAP cases, and could aid in tailoring appropriate antibiotic therapies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-7737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-7737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/biology11030377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35336751</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Antibiotic resistance ; antibiotic sensitivity ; Antibiotic sensitivity testing ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bronchus ; Chlamydia ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Diagnosis ; Etiology ; FilmArray ; Genetic markers ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Gram-positive bacteria ; hospital-acquired pneumonia ; Influenza ; Intensive care ; Laboratories ; Manufacturers ; Methods ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Multidrug resistance ; multiplexed BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus ; Nosocomial infections ; Pathogens ; Phenotypes ; Pneumonia ; Process controls ; Public health ; Respiratory diseases ; Respiratory syncytial virus ; Respiratory tract diseases ; Sensitivity analysis ; Staphylococcus infections ; Streptococcus infections ; Ventilators ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Biology (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-02, Vol.11 (3), p.377</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-78a91176af038c211de3db6cd2609086da8d1ab5ed2ed4971342c50bbb07f8423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-78a91176af038c211de3db6cd2609086da8d1ab5ed2ed4971342c50bbb07f8423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7096-0221 ; 0000-0002-7608-850X ; 0000-0001-7703-6579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642341847?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642341847?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,38515,43894,44589,53790,53792,74183,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamel, Noha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshahrani, Mohammad Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboshanab, Khaled M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Borhamy, Mervat I</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus to the Conventional Diagnostic Methods in Determining the Microbiological Etiology of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia</title><title>Biology (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Biology (Basel)</addtitle><description>Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a substantial public health issue that is associated with high mortality rates and is complicated by an arsenal of microbial etiologies, expressing multidrug-resistant phenotypes, rendering relatively limited therapeutic options. BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus (BFPP) is a simple multiplexed PCR system that integrates sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and analysis of microbial etiology, with a turnaround time of about one hour. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP is simpler, easier to perform, and can simultaneously detect the most common pathogens involved in lower respiratory tract infections (34 targets). Accordingly, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the multiplexed BFPP for the rapid detection of 27 clinically relevant respiratory pathogens and 7 genetic markers among 50 HAP cases admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), who submitted mini-bronchoalveolar (mBAL) specimens. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP showed an overall sensitivity of 100% [95% CI; 90-100] and overall specificity of 90% [95% CI; 87.4-92.5] among all the tested bacterial targets. BFPP identified 11 viral targets (22%) among the tested specimens. The BFPP semi-quantitative analysis showed a concordance rate of 47.4% among positive culture specimens. For the investigation of the antibiotic resistance genes, BFPP showed a positive percent agreement (PPA), a negative percent agreement (NPA), and an overall percent agreement (OPA), reaching 97% [95% CI; 90-100], 95% [95% CI; 91.5-97], and 95% [95% CI; 93-97], respectively, with standard antibiotic sensitivity testing. In conclusion, BFPP has the potential to enhance the rapid microbiological diagnosis of HAP cases, and could aid in tailoring appropriate antibiotic therapies.</description><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>antibiotic sensitivity</subject><subject>Antibiotic sensitivity testing</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bronchus</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>FilmArray</subject><subject>Genetic markers</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>hospital-acquired pneumonia</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multidrug resistance</subject><subject>multiplexed BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Respiratory syncytial virus</subject><subject>Respiratory tract diseases</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>2079-7737</issn><issn>2079-7737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks1uGyEUhUdVqyZKs-6uQuqmm2lgYIDZVHIdu4mUqF60a8SfbSwGHJix5FfqUxbbaZpkNozgO4dzubeqPiL4FeMOXikXfVztEYIYYsbeVOcNZF3NGGZvn_2fVZc5b2D5GGwopu-rM9xiTFmLzqs_s530oxxcDCAuwbC24LuLc5csmDvfT1KSe7AIduxjcBIsZLAeLPyYwRCP9DSGnQ0HvfTg2slViHlwGtzbYR1NBi6AazvY1LvgwuoouXc6xVN4p4tqNpwKOQS4iXnrBunriX4YSwrz__IP1bul9NlePq4X1e_57Nf0pr77-eN2OrmrNeFsqBmXHUKMyiXEXDcIGYuNoto0FHaQUyO5QVK11jTWkI4hTBrdQqUUZEtOGnxR3Z58TZQbsU2ul2kvonTiuBHTSshUSvRWdB2hTQup0soQTFvZKMKRka21Uluuite3k9d2VL01urxUkv6F6cuT4NZiFXeCd6RFmBaDL48GKT6MNg-id1lb70sj4phFQwmBiHOMCvr5FbqJYyptOVINJogTVqirE1V6kHOyy6cwCIrDWIlXY1UUn57X8MT_GyL8FxKSzbg</recordid><startdate>20220227</startdate><enddate>20220227</enddate><creator>Kamel, Noha A</creator><creator>Alshahrani, Mohammad Y</creator><creator>Aboshanab, Khaled M</creator><creator>El Borhamy, Mervat I</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7096-0221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-850X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-6579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220227</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus to the Conventional Diagnostic Methods in Determining the Microbiological Etiology of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia</title><author>Kamel, Noha A ; Alshahrani, Mohammad Y ; Aboshanab, Khaled M ; El Borhamy, Mervat I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-78a91176af038c211de3db6cd2609086da8d1ab5ed2ed4971342c50bbb07f8423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>antibiotic sensitivity</topic><topic>Antibiotic sensitivity testing</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bronchus</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>FilmArray</topic><topic>Genetic markers</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>hospital-acquired pneumonia</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multidrug resistance</topic><topic>multiplexed BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Respiratory syncytial virus</topic><topic>Respiratory tract diseases</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamel, Noha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshahrani, Mohammad Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboshanab, Khaled M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Borhamy, Mervat I</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Biology (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamel, Noha A</au><au>Alshahrani, Mohammad Y</au><au>Aboshanab, Khaled M</au><au>El Borhamy, Mervat I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus to the Conventional Diagnostic Methods in Determining the Microbiological Etiology of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia</atitle><jtitle>Biology (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Biology (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-02-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>377</spage><pages>377-</pages><issn>2079-7737</issn><eissn>2079-7737</eissn><abstract>Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a substantial public health issue that is associated with high mortality rates and is complicated by an arsenal of microbial etiologies, expressing multidrug-resistant phenotypes, rendering relatively limited therapeutic options. BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus (BFPP) is a simple multiplexed PCR system that integrates sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and analysis of microbial etiology, with a turnaround time of about one hour. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP is simpler, easier to perform, and can simultaneously detect the most common pathogens involved in lower respiratory tract infections (34 targets). Accordingly, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the multiplexed BFPP for the rapid detection of 27 clinically relevant respiratory pathogens and 7 genetic markers among 50 HAP cases admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), who submitted mini-bronchoalveolar (mBAL) specimens. In comparison to standard culture methods, BFPP showed an overall sensitivity of 100% [95% CI; 90-100] and overall specificity of 90% [95% CI; 87.4-92.5] among all the tested bacterial targets. BFPP identified 11 viral targets (22%) among the tested specimens. The BFPP semi-quantitative analysis showed a concordance rate of 47.4% among positive culture specimens. For the investigation of the antibiotic resistance genes, BFPP showed a positive percent agreement (PPA), a negative percent agreement (NPA), and an overall percent agreement (OPA), reaching 97% [95% CI; 90-100], 95% [95% CI; 91.5-97], and 95% [95% CI; 93-97], respectively, with standard antibiotic sensitivity testing. In conclusion, BFPP has the potential to enhance the rapid microbiological diagnosis of HAP cases, and could aid in tailoring appropriate antibiotic therapies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35336751</pmid><doi>10.3390/biology11030377</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7096-0221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-850X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-6579</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-7737
ispartof Biology (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-02, Vol.11 (3), p.377
issn 2079-7737
2079-7737
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99462506bcbd4365a2b481da5eeace8b
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Antibiotic resistance
antibiotic sensitivity
Antibiotic sensitivity testing
Antibiotics
Bacteria
Bronchus
Chlamydia
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Diagnosis
Etiology
FilmArray
Genetic markers
Gram-negative bacteria
Gram-positive bacteria
hospital-acquired pneumonia
Influenza
Intensive care
Laboratories
Manufacturers
Methods
Morbidity
Mortality
Multidrug resistance
multiplexed BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus
Nosocomial infections
Pathogens
Phenotypes
Pneumonia
Process controls
Public health
Respiratory diseases
Respiratory syncytial virus
Respiratory tract diseases
Sensitivity analysis
Staphylococcus infections
Streptococcus infections
Ventilators
Viruses
title Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus to the Conventional Diagnostic Methods in Determining the Microbiological Etiology of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A40%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20BioFire%20FilmArray%20Pneumonia%20Panel%20Plus%20to%20the%20Conventional%20Diagnostic%20Methods%20in%20Determining%20the%20Microbiological%20Etiology%20of%20Hospital-Acquired%20Pneumonia&rft.jtitle=Biology%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Kamel,%20Noha%20A&rft.date=2022-02-27&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=377&rft.pages=377-&rft.issn=2079-7737&rft.eissn=2079-7737&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/biology11030377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2642341847%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-78a91176af038c211de3db6cd2609086da8d1ab5ed2ed4971342c50bbb07f8423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642341847&rft_id=info:pmid/35336751&rfr_iscdi=true