Loading…

Epidemiology of emergency and elective caesarean section and its association with early neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan African countries

IntroductionInvestigating elective and emergency caesarean section (CS) separately is important for a better understanding of birth delivery modes in the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region and identifying bottlenecks that prevent favourable childbirth outcomes in SSA. This study aimed at evaluating the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2023-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e074995-e074995
Main Authors: Sandie, Arsène Brunelle, Mutua, Martin K, Sidze, Estelle, Nyakangi, Vivian, Sylla, El Hadji Malick, Wanjoya, Anthony, Njom Nlend, Anne Esther, Faye, Cheikh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionInvestigating elective and emergency caesarean section (CS) separately is important for a better understanding of birth delivery modes in the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region and identifying bottlenecks that prevent favourable childbirth outcomes in SSA. This study aimed at evaluating the prevalences of both CS types, determining their associated socioeconomic factors and their association with early neonatal mortality in SSA.MethodsSSA countries Demographic and Health Surveys data that had collected information on the CS’ timing were included in our study. A total of 21 countries were included in this study, with a total of 155 172 institutional live births. Prevalences of both CS types were estimated at the countries’ level using household sampling weights. Multilevel models were fitted to identify associated socioeconomic factors of both CS types and their associations with early neonatal mortality.ResultsThe emergency CS prevalence in SSA countries was estimated at 4.6% (95% CI 4.4–4.7) and was higher than the elective CS prevalence estimated at 3.4% (95% CI 3.3–3.6). Private health facilities’ elective CS prevalence was estimated at 10.2% (95% CI 9.3–11.2) which was higher than the emergency CS prevalence estimated at 7.7% (95% CI 7.0–8.5). Conversely, in public health facilities, the emergency CS prevalence was estimated at 4.0% (95% CI 3.8–4.2) was higher than the elective CS prevalence estimated at 2.7% (95% CI 2.6–2.8). The richest women were more likely to have birth delivery by both CS types than normal vaginal delivery. Emergency CS was positively associated with early neonatal mortality (adjusted OR=2.37, 95% CI 1.64–3.41), while no association was found with elective CS.ConclusionsFindings suggest shortcomings in pregnancy monitoring, delivery preparation and postnatal care. Beyond antenatal care (ANC) coverage, more attention should be put on quality of ANC, postnatal care, emergency obstetric and newborn care for favourable birth delivery outcomes in SSA.
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074995