Loading…

Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO

After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2022-05, Vol.26 (1), p.144-144, Article 144
Main Authors: Balik, Martin, Mokotedi, Masego Candy, Maly, Michal, Otahal, Michal, Stach, Zdenek, Svobodova, Eva, Flaksa, Marek, Rulisek, Jan, Brozek, Tomas, Porizka, Michal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643
container_end_page 144
container_issue 1
container_start_page 144
container_title Critical care (London, England)
container_volume 26
creator Balik, Martin
Mokotedi, Masego Candy
Maly, Michal
Otahal, Michal
Stach, Zdenek
Svobodova, Eva
Flaksa, Marek
Rulisek, Jan
Brozek, Tomas
Porizka, Michal
description After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1).
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99c8bf9ce6e4416d97b958b4571368ec</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A704300465</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_99c8bf9ce6e4416d97b958b4571368ec</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A704300465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vFCEYnhiNrdU_4MGQePEyFQaGGS4mzaZqk5p60MQbYeCdXTYsrDBT06u_3Hd3a3WN4QCB5yPPw1tVLxk9Z6yXbwvjtBU1bZqaCsr6Wj2qTpmQspZUfXuMZy5F3be8PamelbKmlHW95E-rE962fStZc1r9_DyHTYom3xGbYknBOzP5FIkJE-RCphWQOUzZlDRHR6BMfmMmIGkk2wBzNoGMYfaO3KYwb4D8WEHcK3kH2cclsSvkEJeNj2YJxEeyRQOIUyHocrn4dPO8ejKaUODF_X5WfX1_-WXxsb6--XC1uLiureh6VSvJXSfNwEYQg5ODZYMZRNs3qunooFpoHDdOjlQq3vacsY4bGAY1CjP2nRT8rLo66Lpk1nqbMUi-08l4vb9IealNnrwNoJWy_TAqCxKEYNKpDg16dOuw0h4sar07aG3nYQPOYh6s4kj0-CX6lV6mW612P8cZCry5F8jp-4wV6Y0vFkIwEdJcdCOlVLRDNEJf_wNdpzlHrGqPwvwtlX9QS4MBfBwT-tqdqL7oqOCUCtki6vw_KFwONh6_DUaP90eE5kCwOZWSYXzIyKjeZdGHKdQ4hXo_hVoh6dXf7TxQfo8d_wWeNdkO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666292506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed</source><creator>Balik, Martin ; Mokotedi, Masego Candy ; Maly, Michal ; Otahal, Michal ; Stach, Zdenek ; Svobodova, Eva ; Flaksa, Marek ; Rulisek, Jan ; Brozek, Tomas ; Porizka, Michal</creator><creatorcontrib>Balik, Martin ; Mokotedi, Masego Candy ; Maly, Michal ; Otahal, Michal ; Stach, Zdenek ; Svobodova, Eva ; Flaksa, Marek ; Rulisek, Jan ; Brozek, Tomas ; Porizka, Michal</creatorcontrib><description>After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-609X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35585612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal ; Correspondence ; Critical care ; Drainage ; Drainage, Surgical ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Humans ; Lungs ; Methods ; Planning ; Pleura ; Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging ; Pleural Effusion - therapy ; Respiratory System ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2022-05, Vol.26 (1), p.144-144, Article 144</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1864-2143</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118631/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666292506?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balik, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maly, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otahal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stach, Zdenek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svobodova, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flaksa, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rulisek, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brozek, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porizka, Michal</creatorcontrib><title>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1).</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</subject><subject>Correspondence</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage, Surgical</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Pleura</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - therapy</subject><subject>Respiratory System</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1366-609X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vFCEYnhiNrdU_4MGQePEyFQaGGS4mzaZqk5p60MQbYeCdXTYsrDBT06u_3Hd3a3WN4QCB5yPPw1tVLxk9Z6yXbwvjtBU1bZqaCsr6Wj2qTpmQspZUfXuMZy5F3be8PamelbKmlHW95E-rE962fStZc1r9_DyHTYom3xGbYknBOzP5FIkJE-RCphWQOUzZlDRHR6BMfmMmIGkk2wBzNoGMYfaO3KYwb4D8WEHcK3kH2cclsSvkEJeNj2YJxEeyRQOIUyHocrn4dPO8ejKaUODF_X5WfX1_-WXxsb6--XC1uLiureh6VSvJXSfNwEYQg5ODZYMZRNs3qunooFpoHDdOjlQq3vacsY4bGAY1CjP2nRT8rLo66Lpk1nqbMUi-08l4vb9IealNnrwNoJWy_TAqCxKEYNKpDg16dOuw0h4sar07aG3nYQPOYh6s4kj0-CX6lV6mW612P8cZCry5F8jp-4wV6Y0vFkIwEdJcdCOlVLRDNEJf_wNdpzlHrGqPwvwtlX9QS4MBfBwT-tqdqL7oqOCUCtki6vw_KFwONh6_DUaP90eE5kCwOZWSYXzIyKjeZdGHKdQ4hXo_hVoh6dXf7TxQfo8d_wWeNdkO</recordid><startdate>20220518</startdate><enddate>20220518</enddate><creator>Balik, Martin</creator><creator>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</creator><creator>Maly, Michal</creator><creator>Otahal, Michal</creator><creator>Stach, Zdenek</creator><creator>Svobodova, Eva</creator><creator>Flaksa, Marek</creator><creator>Rulisek, Jan</creator><creator>Brozek, Tomas</creator><creator>Porizka, Michal</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-2143</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220518</creationdate><title>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</title><author>Balik, Martin ; Mokotedi, Masego Candy ; Maly, Michal ; Otahal, Michal ; Stach, Zdenek ; Svobodova, Eva ; Flaksa, Marek ; Rulisek, Jan ; Brozek, Tomas ; Porizka, Michal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</topic><topic>Correspondence</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage, Surgical</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Pleura</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - therapy</topic><topic>Respiratory System</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balik, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maly, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otahal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stach, Zdenek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svobodova, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flaksa, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rulisek, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brozek, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porizka, Michal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balik, Martin</au><au>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</au><au>Maly, Michal</au><au>Otahal, Michal</au><au>Stach, Zdenek</au><au>Svobodova, Eva</au><au>Flaksa, Marek</au><au>Rulisek, Jan</au><au>Brozek, Tomas</au><au>Porizka, Michal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2022-05-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>144-144</pages><artnum>144</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><eissn>1366-609X</eissn><abstract>After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35585612</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-2143</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-8535
ispartof Critical care (London, England), 2022-05, Vol.26 (1), p.144-144, Article 144
issn 1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
1366-609X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99c8bf9ce6e4416d97b958b4571368ec
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed
subjects Biopsy
Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal
Correspondence
Critical care
Drainage
Drainage, Surgical
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Humans
Lungs
Methods
Planning
Pleura
Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging
Pleural Effusion - therapy
Respiratory System
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography
Ventilators
title Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pulmonary%20consolidation%20alters%20the%20ultrasound%20estimate%20of%20pleural%20fluid%20volume%20when%20considering%20chest%20drainage%20in%20patients%20on%20ECMO&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Balik,%20Martin&rft.date=2022-05-18&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=144-144&rft.artnum=144&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA704300465%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666292506&rft_id=info:pmid/35585612&rft_galeid=A704300465&rfr_iscdi=true