Loading…
Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO
After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid v...
Saved in:
Published in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2022-05, Vol.26 (1), p.144-144, Article 144 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643 |
container_end_page | 144 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | Critical care (London, England) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Balik, Martin Mokotedi, Masego Candy Maly, Michal Otahal, Michal Stach, Zdenek Svobodova, Eva Flaksa, Marek Rulisek, Jan Brozek, Tomas Porizka, Michal |
description | After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99c8bf9ce6e4416d97b958b4571368ec</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A704300465</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_99c8bf9ce6e4416d97b958b4571368ec</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A704300465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vFCEYnhiNrdU_4MGQePEyFQaGGS4mzaZqk5p60MQbYeCdXTYsrDBT06u_3Hd3a3WN4QCB5yPPw1tVLxk9Z6yXbwvjtBU1bZqaCsr6Wj2qTpmQspZUfXuMZy5F3be8PamelbKmlHW95E-rE962fStZc1r9_DyHTYom3xGbYknBOzP5FIkJE-RCphWQOUzZlDRHR6BMfmMmIGkk2wBzNoGMYfaO3KYwb4D8WEHcK3kH2cclsSvkEJeNj2YJxEeyRQOIUyHocrn4dPO8ejKaUODF_X5WfX1_-WXxsb6--XC1uLiureh6VSvJXSfNwEYQg5ODZYMZRNs3qunooFpoHDdOjlQq3vacsY4bGAY1CjP2nRT8rLo66Lpk1nqbMUi-08l4vb9IealNnrwNoJWy_TAqCxKEYNKpDg16dOuw0h4sar07aG3nYQPOYh6s4kj0-CX6lV6mW612P8cZCry5F8jp-4wV6Y0vFkIwEdJcdCOlVLRDNEJf_wNdpzlHrGqPwvwtlX9QS4MBfBwT-tqdqL7oqOCUCtki6vw_KFwONh6_DUaP90eE5kCwOZWSYXzIyKjeZdGHKdQ4hXo_hVoh6dXf7TxQfo8d_wWeNdkO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666292506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed</source><creator>Balik, Martin ; Mokotedi, Masego Candy ; Maly, Michal ; Otahal, Michal ; Stach, Zdenek ; Svobodova, Eva ; Flaksa, Marek ; Rulisek, Jan ; Brozek, Tomas ; Porizka, Michal</creator><creatorcontrib>Balik, Martin ; Mokotedi, Masego Candy ; Maly, Michal ; Otahal, Michal ; Stach, Zdenek ; Svobodova, Eva ; Flaksa, Marek ; Rulisek, Jan ; Brozek, Tomas ; Porizka, Michal</creatorcontrib><description>After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-609X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35585612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal ; Correspondence ; Critical care ; Drainage ; Drainage, Surgical ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Humans ; Lungs ; Methods ; Planning ; Pleura ; Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging ; Pleural Effusion - therapy ; Respiratory System ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2022-05, Vol.26 (1), p.144-144, Article 144</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1864-2143</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118631/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666292506?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balik, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maly, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otahal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stach, Zdenek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svobodova, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flaksa, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rulisek, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brozek, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porizka, Michal</creatorcontrib><title>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1).</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</subject><subject>Correspondence</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage, Surgical</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Pleura</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - therapy</subject><subject>Respiratory System</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1366-609X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vFCEYnhiNrdU_4MGQePEyFQaGGS4mzaZqk5p60MQbYeCdXTYsrDBT06u_3Hd3a3WN4QCB5yPPw1tVLxk9Z6yXbwvjtBU1bZqaCsr6Wj2qTpmQspZUfXuMZy5F3be8PamelbKmlHW95E-rE962fStZc1r9_DyHTYom3xGbYknBOzP5FIkJE-RCphWQOUzZlDRHR6BMfmMmIGkk2wBzNoGMYfaO3KYwb4D8WEHcK3kH2cclsSvkEJeNj2YJxEeyRQOIUyHocrn4dPO8ejKaUODF_X5WfX1_-WXxsb6--XC1uLiureh6VSvJXSfNwEYQg5ODZYMZRNs3qunooFpoHDdOjlQq3vacsY4bGAY1CjP2nRT8rLo66Lpk1nqbMUi-08l4vb9IealNnrwNoJWy_TAqCxKEYNKpDg16dOuw0h4sar07aG3nYQPOYh6s4kj0-CX6lV6mW612P8cZCry5F8jp-4wV6Y0vFkIwEdJcdCOlVLRDNEJf_wNdpzlHrGqPwvwtlX9QS4MBfBwT-tqdqL7oqOCUCtki6vw_KFwONh6_DUaP90eE5kCwOZWSYXzIyKjeZdGHKdQ4hXo_hVoh6dXf7TxQfo8d_wWeNdkO</recordid><startdate>20220518</startdate><enddate>20220518</enddate><creator>Balik, Martin</creator><creator>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</creator><creator>Maly, Michal</creator><creator>Otahal, Michal</creator><creator>Stach, Zdenek</creator><creator>Svobodova, Eva</creator><creator>Flaksa, Marek</creator><creator>Rulisek, Jan</creator><creator>Brozek, Tomas</creator><creator>Porizka, Michal</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-2143</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220518</creationdate><title>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</title><author>Balik, Martin ; Mokotedi, Masego Candy ; Maly, Michal ; Otahal, Michal ; Stach, Zdenek ; Svobodova, Eva ; Flaksa, Marek ; Rulisek, Jan ; Brozek, Tomas ; Porizka, Michal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</topic><topic>Correspondence</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage, Surgical</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Pleura</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - therapy</topic><topic>Respiratory System</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balik, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maly, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otahal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stach, Zdenek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svobodova, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flaksa, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rulisek, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brozek, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porizka, Michal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balik, Martin</au><au>Mokotedi, Masego Candy</au><au>Maly, Michal</au><au>Otahal, Michal</au><au>Stach, Zdenek</au><au>Svobodova, Eva</au><au>Flaksa, Marek</au><au>Rulisek, Jan</au><au>Brozek, Tomas</au><au>Porizka, Michal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2022-05-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>144-144</pages><artnum>144</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><eissn>1366-609X</eissn><abstract>After excluding three effusions (5.7%) for incomplete drainage, a total of 50 effusions were evaluated and drained in 42 (27 males and 15 females) patients (age 44 ± 17 years, APACHE II 25.8 ± 6.8, SOFA 11 ± 2.5, height 174 ± 7 cm, body weight 87 ± 20 kg). The known CUS assessment of pleural fluid volume largely underestimates reality [1] in severely consolidated lungs surrounded by potentially misleadingly thin layer of circumferential effusion. The prediction error may be greatly reduced by calculating with pleural separation above the posterior axillary line which enables better evaluation of the benefits of pleural drainage versus the risks of complications in anticoagulated patients on ECMO (Fig. 1).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35585612</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-2143</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8535 |
ispartof | Critical care (London, England), 2022-05, Vol.26 (1), p.144-144, Article 144 |
issn | 1364-8535 1466-609X 1364-8535 1366-609X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99c8bf9ce6e4416d97b958b4571368ec |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed |
subjects | Biopsy Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal Correspondence Critical care Drainage Drainage, Surgical Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Humans Lungs Methods Planning Pleura Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging Pleural Effusion - therapy Respiratory System Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography Ventilators |
title | Pulmonary consolidation alters the ultrasound estimate of pleural fluid volume when considering chest drainage in patients on ECMO |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pulmonary%20consolidation%20alters%20the%20ultrasound%20estimate%20of%20pleural%20fluid%20volume%20when%20considering%20chest%20drainage%20in%20patients%20on%20ECMO&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Balik,%20Martin&rft.date=2022-05-18&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=144-144&rft.artnum=144&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13054-022-04018-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA704300465%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4789-963d76ab1fe4bd6bc1bab45829270b95e2d3ad6f06935831173aebb9f4af87643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666292506&rft_id=info:pmid/35585612&rft_galeid=A704300465&rfr_iscdi=true |