Loading…
Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia
Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not onl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ekonomika regiona 2017-06, Vol.13 (2), p.422-433 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; rus |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f4f87f47282a318b61d071f7cd157d1cc3cba7ad46e5f6051707d69a8e1039683 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 433 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 422 |
container_title | Ekonomika regiona |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Strokov, A.S. Yakubovich, E.N. Krasilnikov, P.V. |
description | Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17059/2017-2-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99cc54c2d89d4ab385a06d446fbfff2f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_99cc54c2d89d4ab385a06d446fbfff2f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2503454414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f4f87f47282a318b61d071f7cd157d1cc3cba7ad46e5f6051707d69a8e1039683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtKAzEUDaJgqV34BwFXLkaTTF7jTkrV4oAbuw63edSU6aRmpoJ_b2rF1X2cwzn3HoSuKbmjiojmnhGqKlbpMzRhnNKKciLPS08UqySn_BLNhmFLCKFS0UawCWoXNvVpFy2G3uEydGkTLXR48QXdAcaYepwCbo_oavB4_gH9xj8UODrfW49DTjv8Ctl3Ea7QRYBu8LO_OkWrp8X7_KVq356X88e2skzrsQo8aBW4YppBTfVaUkcUDco6KpSj1tZ2DQocl14ESUT5TTnZgPaU1I3U9RQtT7ouwdbsc9xB_jYJovldpLwxkMdoO2-axlrBLXO6cRzWtRZApONchnUIgYWidXPS2uf0efDDaLbpkPtyvmGC1Fzwklth3Z5YNqdhyD78u1JifrM3x-wNM7r-AQQzc5o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503454414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Strokov, A.S. ; Yakubovich, E.N. ; Krasilnikov, P.V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strokov, A.S. ; Yakubovich, E.N. ; Krasilnikov, P.V.</creatorcontrib><description>Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2411-1406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17059/2017-2-8</identifier><language>eng ; rus</language><publisher>Yekaterinburg: Institute of economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Animal husbandry ; Breeding of animals ; comparative analysis ; development scenarios ; ecosystem services ; Environmental economics ; Karelia ; land degradation ; Land use ; peat mining ; Russia ; wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ekonomika regiona, 2017-06, Vol.13 (2), p.422-433</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f4f87f47282a318b61d071f7cd157d1cc3cba7ad46e5f6051707d69a8e1039683</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2503454414?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strokov, A.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakubovich, E.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krasilnikov, P.V.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia</title><title>Ekonomika regiona</title><description>Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature.</description><subject>Animal husbandry</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>comparative analysis</subject><subject>development scenarios</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Karelia</subject><subject>land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>peat mining</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>wetlands</subject><issn>2072-6414</issn><issn>2411-1406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMtKAzEUDaJgqV34BwFXLkaTTF7jTkrV4oAbuw63edSU6aRmpoJ_b2rF1X2cwzn3HoSuKbmjiojmnhGqKlbpMzRhnNKKciLPS08UqySn_BLNhmFLCKFS0UawCWoXNvVpFy2G3uEydGkTLXR48QXdAcaYepwCbo_oavB4_gH9xj8UODrfW49DTjv8Ctl3Ea7QRYBu8LO_OkWrp8X7_KVq356X88e2skzrsQo8aBW4YppBTfVaUkcUDco6KpSj1tZ2DQocl14ESUT5TTnZgPaU1I3U9RQtT7ouwdbsc9xB_jYJovldpLwxkMdoO2-axlrBLXO6cRzWtRZApONchnUIgYWidXPS2uf0efDDaLbpkPtyvmGC1Fzwklth3Z5YNqdhyD78u1JifrM3x-wNM7r-AQQzc5o</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Strokov, A.S.</creator><creator>Yakubovich, E.N.</creator><creator>Krasilnikov, P.V.</creator><general>Institute of economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</general><general>Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia</title><author>Strokov, A.S. ; Yakubovich, E.N. ; Krasilnikov, P.V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f4f87f47282a318b61d071f7cd157d1cc3cba7ad46e5f6051707d69a8e1039683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rus</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal husbandry</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>comparative analysis</topic><topic>development scenarios</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Karelia</topic><topic>land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>peat mining</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strokov, A.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakubovich, E.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krasilnikov, P.V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ekonomika regiona</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strokov, A.S.</au><au>Yakubovich, E.N.</au><au>Krasilnikov, P.V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia</atitle><jtitle>Ekonomika regiona</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>422-433</pages><issn>2072-6414</issn><eissn>2411-1406</eissn><abstract>Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature.</abstract><cop>Yekaterinburg</cop><pub>Institute of economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</pub><doi>10.17059/2017-2-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6414 |
ispartof | Ekonomika regiona, 2017-06, Vol.13 (2), p.422-433 |
issn | 2072-6414 2411-1406 |
language | eng ; rus |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_99cc54c2d89d4ab385a06d446fbfff2f |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Animal husbandry Breeding of animals comparative analysis development scenarios ecosystem services Environmental economics Karelia land degradation Land use peat mining Russia wetlands |
title | Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A06%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20and%20Ecological%20Evaluation%20of%20Land%20Use%20Change:%20Evidence%20from%20Karelia&rft.jtitle=Ekonomika%20regiona&rft.au=Strokov,%20A.S.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=422-433&rft.issn=2072-6414&rft.eissn=2411-1406&rft_id=info:doi/10.17059/2017-2-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2503454414%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f4f87f47282a318b61d071f7cd157d1cc3cba7ad46e5f6051707d69a8e1039683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503454414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |