Loading…
Evaluating changes in the emergency medical services workforce: A preliminary multistate study
Objective There is growing concern with the strength and stability of the emergency medical services (EMS) workforce with reports of workforce challenges in many communities in the United States. Our objective was to estimate changes in the EMS workforce by evaluating the number of clinicians who en...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open 2023-06, Vol.4 (3), p.e12975-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-d5a0d0c25ec0cc77072cfdc9ea79e314e153b64280f42e0ae5b0eb00beeae4853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-d5a0d0c25ec0cc77072cfdc9ea79e314e153b64280f42e0ae5b0eb00beeae4853 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e12975 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Kurth, Jordan D. Powell, Jonathan R. Gage, Christopher B. Fauvel, Alix Delamare Crowe, Remle P. Cash, Rebecca E. Panchal, Ashish R. |
description | Objective
There is growing concern with the strength and stability of the emergency medical services (EMS) workforce with reports of workforce challenges in many communities in the United States. Our objective was to estimate changes in the EMS workforce by evaluating the number of clinicians who enter, stay, and leave.
Methods
A 4‐year retrospective cohort evaluation of all certified EMS clinicians at the emergency medical technician (EMT) level or higher was conducted for 9 states that require national EMS certification to obtain and maintain EMS licensure. The study spanned 2 recertification cycles (2017–2021) for 2 workforce populations: the certified workforce (all EMS clinicians certified to practice) and the patient care workforce (the subset who reported providing patient care). Descriptive statistics were calculated and classified into 1 of 3 categories: EMS clinicians who entered, stayed in, or left each respective workforce population.
Results
There were 62,061 certified EMS clinicians in the 9 included states during the study period, and 52,269 reported providing patient care. For the certified workforce, 80%–82% stayed in and 18%–20% entered the workforce. For the patient care workforce, 74%–77% stayed and 29%–30% entered. State‐level rates of leaving each workforce ranged from 16% to 19% (certified) and 19% to 33% (patient care). From 2017 to 2020, there was a net growth of both the certified (8.8%) and patient care workforces (7.6%).
Conclusions
This was a comprehensive evaluation of both the certified and patient care EMS workforce dynamics in 9 states. This population‐level evaluation serves as the first step for more detailed analyses to better understand workforce dynamics in EMS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/emp2.12975 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9a41b86b77dd4ed6ae220fb8fcfd4602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9a41b86b77dd4ed6ae220fb8fcfd4602</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2820970905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-d5a0d0c25ec0cc77072cfdc9ea79e314e153b64280f42e0ae5b0eb00beeae4853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhi0EolXphQdAkbggpC1jx44TLqiqFlqpCA5wxXKcSdaLEy92stW-PU7TVi0HTh7Znz7_Yw8hrymcUQD2AfsdO6OskuIZOWZFWa4oFez5o_qInMa4hQQLSmVZviRHuUx1LuCY_FrvtZv0aIcuMxs9dBgzO2TjBjPsMXQ4mEPWY2ONdlnEsLcmETc-_G59MPgxO892AZ3t7aBDIic32jjqEbM4Ts3hFXnRahfx9G49IT8_r39cXK6uv325uji_XhnOhVg1QkMDhgk0YIyUIJlpG1OhlhXmlCMVeV1wVkLLGYJGUQPWADWiRl6K_IRcLd7G663aBdunNMprq243fOiUDqM1DlWlOa3LopayaTg2hUbGoK3LNt3IC2DJ9Wlx7aY6dW5wGIN2T6RPTwa7UZ3fKwqMUl7Mhnd3huD_TBhH1dto0Dk9oJ-iYiWDSkIFc_C3_6BbP4UhvdVMVTmrCikT9X6hTPAxBmwf0lBQ8xioeQzU7Rgk-M3j_A_o_acngC7AjXV4-I9Krb9-Z4v0L-VRvpI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2829329677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating changes in the emergency medical services workforce: A preliminary multistate study</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Kurth, Jordan D. ; Powell, Jonathan R. ; Gage, Christopher B. ; Fauvel, Alix Delamare ; Crowe, Remle P. ; Cash, Rebecca E. ; Panchal, Ashish R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jordan D. ; Powell, Jonathan R. ; Gage, Christopher B. ; Fauvel, Alix Delamare ; Crowe, Remle P. ; Cash, Rebecca E. ; Panchal, Ashish R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
There is growing concern with the strength and stability of the emergency medical services (EMS) workforce with reports of workforce challenges in many communities in the United States. Our objective was to estimate changes in the EMS workforce by evaluating the number of clinicians who enter, stay, and leave.
Methods
A 4‐year retrospective cohort evaluation of all certified EMS clinicians at the emergency medical technician (EMT) level or higher was conducted for 9 states that require national EMS certification to obtain and maintain EMS licensure. The study spanned 2 recertification cycles (2017–2021) for 2 workforce populations: the certified workforce (all EMS clinicians certified to practice) and the patient care workforce (the subset who reported providing patient care). Descriptive statistics were calculated and classified into 1 of 3 categories: EMS clinicians who entered, stayed in, or left each respective workforce population.
Results
There were 62,061 certified EMS clinicians in the 9 included states during the study period, and 52,269 reported providing patient care. For the certified workforce, 80%–82% stayed in and 18%–20% entered the workforce. For the patient care workforce, 74%–77% stayed and 29%–30% entered. State‐level rates of leaving each workforce ranged from 16% to 19% (certified) and 19% to 33% (patient care). From 2017 to 2020, there was a net growth of both the certified (8.8%) and patient care workforces (7.6%).
Conclusions
This was a comprehensive evaluation of both the certified and patient care EMS workforce dynamics in 9 states. This population‐level evaluation serves as the first step for more detailed analyses to better understand workforce dynamics in EMS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2688-1152</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-1152</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12975</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37251350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Certification ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency services ; Original Research ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 2023-06, Vol.4 (3), p.e12975-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-d5a0d0c25ec0cc77072cfdc9ea79e314e153b64280f42e0ae5b0eb00beeae4853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-d5a0d0c25ec0cc77072cfdc9ea79e314e153b64280f42e0ae5b0eb00beeae4853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2829329677/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2829329677?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251350$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jordan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gage, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauvel, Alix Delamare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Remle P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Rebecca E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panchal, Ashish R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating changes in the emergency medical services workforce: A preliminary multistate study</title><title>Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open</addtitle><description>Objective
There is growing concern with the strength and stability of the emergency medical services (EMS) workforce with reports of workforce challenges in many communities in the United States. Our objective was to estimate changes in the EMS workforce by evaluating the number of clinicians who enter, stay, and leave.
Methods
A 4‐year retrospective cohort evaluation of all certified EMS clinicians at the emergency medical technician (EMT) level or higher was conducted for 9 states that require national EMS certification to obtain and maintain EMS licensure. The study spanned 2 recertification cycles (2017–2021) for 2 workforce populations: the certified workforce (all EMS clinicians certified to practice) and the patient care workforce (the subset who reported providing patient care). Descriptive statistics were calculated and classified into 1 of 3 categories: EMS clinicians who entered, stayed in, or left each respective workforce population.
Results
There were 62,061 certified EMS clinicians in the 9 included states during the study period, and 52,269 reported providing patient care. For the certified workforce, 80%–82% stayed in and 18%–20% entered the workforce. For the patient care workforce, 74%–77% stayed and 29%–30% entered. State‐level rates of leaving each workforce ranged from 16% to 19% (certified) and 19% to 33% (patient care). From 2017 to 2020, there was a net growth of both the certified (8.8%) and patient care workforces (7.6%).
Conclusions
This was a comprehensive evaluation of both the certified and patient care EMS workforce dynamics in 9 states. This population‐level evaluation serves as the first step for more detailed analyses to better understand workforce dynamics in EMS.</description><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>2688-1152</issn><issn>2688-1152</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhi0EolXphQdAkbggpC1jx44TLqiqFlqpCA5wxXKcSdaLEy92stW-PU7TVi0HTh7Znz7_Yw8hrymcUQD2AfsdO6OskuIZOWZFWa4oFez5o_qInMa4hQQLSmVZviRHuUx1LuCY_FrvtZv0aIcuMxs9dBgzO2TjBjPsMXQ4mEPWY2ONdlnEsLcmETc-_G59MPgxO892AZ3t7aBDIic32jjqEbM4Ts3hFXnRahfx9G49IT8_r39cXK6uv325uji_XhnOhVg1QkMDhgk0YIyUIJlpG1OhlhXmlCMVeV1wVkLLGYJGUQPWADWiRl6K_IRcLd7G663aBdunNMprq243fOiUDqM1DlWlOa3LopayaTg2hUbGoK3LNt3IC2DJ9Wlx7aY6dW5wGIN2T6RPTwa7UZ3fKwqMUl7Mhnd3huD_TBhH1dto0Dk9oJ-iYiWDSkIFc_C3_6BbP4UhvdVMVTmrCikT9X6hTPAxBmwf0lBQ8xioeQzU7Rgk-M3j_A_o_acngC7AjXV4-I9Krb9-Z4v0L-VRvpI</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Kurth, Jordan D.</creator><creator>Powell, Jonathan R.</creator><creator>Gage, Christopher B.</creator><creator>Fauvel, Alix Delamare</creator><creator>Crowe, Remle P.</creator><creator>Cash, Rebecca E.</creator><creator>Panchal, Ashish R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Evaluating changes in the emergency medical services workforce: A preliminary multistate study</title><author>Kurth, Jordan D. ; Powell, Jonathan R. ; Gage, Christopher B. ; Fauvel, Alix Delamare ; Crowe, Remle P. ; Cash, Rebecca E. ; Panchal, Ashish R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-d5a0d0c25ec0cc77072cfdc9ea79e314e153b64280f42e0ae5b0eb00beeae4853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jordan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gage, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauvel, Alix Delamare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Remle P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Rebecca E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panchal, Ashish R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurth, Jordan D.</au><au>Powell, Jonathan R.</au><au>Gage, Christopher B.</au><au>Fauvel, Alix Delamare</au><au>Crowe, Remle P.</au><au>Cash, Rebecca E.</au><au>Panchal, Ashish R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating changes in the emergency medical services workforce: A preliminary multistate study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e12975</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12975-n/a</pages><issn>2688-1152</issn><eissn>2688-1152</eissn><abstract>Objective
There is growing concern with the strength and stability of the emergency medical services (EMS) workforce with reports of workforce challenges in many communities in the United States. Our objective was to estimate changes in the EMS workforce by evaluating the number of clinicians who enter, stay, and leave.
Methods
A 4‐year retrospective cohort evaluation of all certified EMS clinicians at the emergency medical technician (EMT) level or higher was conducted for 9 states that require national EMS certification to obtain and maintain EMS licensure. The study spanned 2 recertification cycles (2017–2021) for 2 workforce populations: the certified workforce (all EMS clinicians certified to practice) and the patient care workforce (the subset who reported providing patient care). Descriptive statistics were calculated and classified into 1 of 3 categories: EMS clinicians who entered, stayed in, or left each respective workforce population.
Results
There were 62,061 certified EMS clinicians in the 9 included states during the study period, and 52,269 reported providing patient care. For the certified workforce, 80%–82% stayed in and 18%–20% entered the workforce. For the patient care workforce, 74%–77% stayed and 29%–30% entered. State‐level rates of leaving each workforce ranged from 16% to 19% (certified) and 19% to 33% (patient care). From 2017 to 2020, there was a net growth of both the certified (8.8%) and patient care workforces (7.6%).
Conclusions
This was a comprehensive evaluation of both the certified and patient care EMS workforce dynamics in 9 states. This population‐level evaluation serves as the first step for more detailed analyses to better understand workforce dynamics in EMS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37251350</pmid><doi>10.1002/emp2.12975</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2688-1152 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 2023-06, Vol.4 (3), p.e12975-n/a |
issn | 2688-1152 2688-1152 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9a41b86b77dd4ed6ae220fb8fcfd4602 |
source | PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Certification Emergency medical care Emergency Medical Services Emergency services Original Research Workforce |
title | Evaluating changes in the emergency medical services workforce: A preliminary multistate study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20changes%20in%20the%20emergency%20medical%20services%20workforce:%20A%20preliminary%20multistate%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Emergency%20Physicians%20Open&rft.au=Kurth,%20Jordan%20D.&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e12975&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12975-n/a&rft.issn=2688-1152&rft.eissn=2688-1152&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/emp2.12975&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2820970905%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-d5a0d0c25ec0cc77072cfdc9ea79e314e153b64280f42e0ae5b0eb00beeae4853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2829329677&rft_id=info:pmid/37251350&rfr_iscdi=true |