Loading…

Impacts of Sustainable Forestry Initiative fiber sourcing on the forestry best management practices and biodiversity conservation in the SE United States

•BMP rates not different inside, outside, or within certified mills’ sourcing areas.•Habitats biodiversity categories receive similar conservation attention.•SFI FSS certification broadens sustainable forest management in SE United States. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Fiber Sourcing Sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trees, Forests and People (Online) Forests and People (Online), 2023-03, Vol.11, p.100349, Article 100349
Main Authors: Karnatz, Caroline, Kadam, Parag, Hamilton, Healy, Smyth, Regan, Bawa, Ranjit, Dwivedi, Puneet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2f34c3635571afdbcb6cf2be388ff9bec6748211eeffa978dbb37bb163e95b503
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2f34c3635571afdbcb6cf2be388ff9bec6748211eeffa978dbb37bb163e95b503
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100349
container_title Trees, Forests and People (Online)
container_volume 11
creator Karnatz, Caroline
Kadam, Parag
Hamilton, Healy
Smyth, Regan
Bawa, Ranjit
Dwivedi, Puneet
description •BMP rates not different inside, outside, or within certified mills’ sourcing areas.•Habitats biodiversity categories receive similar conservation attention.•SFI FSS certification broadens sustainable forest management in SE United States. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Fiber Sourcing Standard (FSS) aims to extend the reach of sustainable forest management onto uncertified forestlands through the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for water quality and other requirements intended to promote multiple conservation outcomes. Conservation of biological diversity is one of the pillars of the SFI FSS, yet no study has examined its effect on biodiversity conservation at the landscape level. We analyzed BMP implementation rates (inside, outside, and within overlapped wood baskets of certified wood-consuming mills) across five levels (very high, high, medium, low, and very low) biodiversity habitats to measure the impact of the SFI FSS in four states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina) in the SE United States. BMP implementation rates were not significantly different inside, outside, or within multiple wood baskets of mills certified to the SFI FSS. We also find that the SFI FSS facilitates the same level of adherence to sustainable forest practices across various levels of biodiversity habitats, regardless of the presence or absence of imperiled species. High compliance rates across the region indicate that all tracts of land, irrespective of biodiversity categories, typically receive the same level of conservation attention. In this context, the SFI FSS is broadening the reach of sustainable forest management beyond certified forests in the SE United States.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100349
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9ac7e85750d64b68bb3dceee1e9f42fb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2666719322001558</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9ac7e85750d64b68bb3dceee1e9f42fb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2834266161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2f34c3635571afdbcb6cf2be388ff9bec6748211eeffa978dbb37bb163e95b503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEElXbB-DmI5dd_CdxYnFCVQsrVeph6dmynfHiVWIH27vSPgpvy5QA4sRp7NH3_caer2neMbpllMkPx231y5ZTzvFORateNVdcSrnpmRKv_zm_bW5LOVJKeceYGtqr5sduXoyrhSRP9qdSTYjGTkAeUoZS84XsYqjB1HAG4oOFTEo6ZRfigaRI6jfs_lFaLGQ20RxghljJkhEcHBRi4khsSCNCcgn1QlyKBfIZsQgJK2d_T55xFoxkX02FctO88WYqcPu7XjfPD_df775sHp8-7-4-PW5cK1TdcC9aJ6Toup4ZP1pnpfPcghgG75UFJ_t24IwBeG9UP4zWit5aJgWoznZUXDe7lTsmc9RLDrPJF51M0L8aKR-0yfiPCbQyroeh6zs6ytbKAVGjAwAGyrfcW2S9X1lLTt9PuA89h-JgmkyEdCqaD6LFMJhkKGWr1OVUSgb_dzSj-iVVfdSYqn5JVa-poufj6gHcxzlA1sUFiA7GkMFVfHD4j_snBtGu4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2834266161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Sustainable Forestry Initiative fiber sourcing on the forestry best management practices and biodiversity conservation in the SE United States</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Karnatz, Caroline ; Kadam, Parag ; Hamilton, Healy ; Smyth, Regan ; Bawa, Ranjit ; Dwivedi, Puneet</creator><creatorcontrib>Karnatz, Caroline ; Kadam, Parag ; Hamilton, Healy ; Smyth, Regan ; Bawa, Ranjit ; Dwivedi, Puneet</creatorcontrib><description>•BMP rates not different inside, outside, or within certified mills’ sourcing areas.•Habitats biodiversity categories receive similar conservation attention.•SFI FSS certification broadens sustainable forest management in SE United States. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Fiber Sourcing Standard (FSS) aims to extend the reach of sustainable forest management onto uncertified forestlands through the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for water quality and other requirements intended to promote multiple conservation outcomes. Conservation of biological diversity is one of the pillars of the SFI FSS, yet no study has examined its effect on biodiversity conservation at the landscape level. We analyzed BMP implementation rates (inside, outside, and within overlapped wood baskets of certified wood-consuming mills) across five levels (very high, high, medium, low, and very low) biodiversity habitats to measure the impact of the SFI FSS in four states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina) in the SE United States. BMP implementation rates were not significantly different inside, outside, or within multiple wood baskets of mills certified to the SFI FSS. We also find that the SFI FSS facilitates the same level of adherence to sustainable forest practices across various levels of biodiversity habitats, regardless of the presence or absence of imperiled species. High compliance rates across the region indicate that all tracts of land, irrespective of biodiversity categories, typically receive the same level of conservation attention. In this context, the SFI FSS is broadening the reach of sustainable forest management beyond certified forests in the SE United States.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2666-7193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-7193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alabama ; Biodiversity ; biodiversity conservation ; compliance ; Florida ; Forest certification ; forest land ; forestry ; Georgia ; landscapes ; South Carolina ; Southern United States ; Sustainable forest management ; sustainable forestry ; threatened species ; water quality ; wood</subject><ispartof>Trees, Forests and People (Online), 2023-03, Vol.11, p.100349, Article 100349</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2f34c3635571afdbcb6cf2be388ff9bec6748211eeffa978dbb37bb163e95b503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2f34c3635571afdbcb6cf2be388ff9bec6748211eeffa978dbb37bb163e95b503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6534-4205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322001558$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karnatz, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadam, Parag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Healy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Regan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bawa, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Puneet</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Sustainable Forestry Initiative fiber sourcing on the forestry best management practices and biodiversity conservation in the SE United States</title><title>Trees, Forests and People (Online)</title><description>•BMP rates not different inside, outside, or within certified mills’ sourcing areas.•Habitats biodiversity categories receive similar conservation attention.•SFI FSS certification broadens sustainable forest management in SE United States. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Fiber Sourcing Standard (FSS) aims to extend the reach of sustainable forest management onto uncertified forestlands through the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for water quality and other requirements intended to promote multiple conservation outcomes. Conservation of biological diversity is one of the pillars of the SFI FSS, yet no study has examined its effect on biodiversity conservation at the landscape level. We analyzed BMP implementation rates (inside, outside, and within overlapped wood baskets of certified wood-consuming mills) across five levels (very high, high, medium, low, and very low) biodiversity habitats to measure the impact of the SFI FSS in four states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina) in the SE United States. BMP implementation rates were not significantly different inside, outside, or within multiple wood baskets of mills certified to the SFI FSS. We also find that the SFI FSS facilitates the same level of adherence to sustainable forest practices across various levels of biodiversity habitats, regardless of the presence or absence of imperiled species. High compliance rates across the region indicate that all tracts of land, irrespective of biodiversity categories, typically receive the same level of conservation attention. In this context, the SFI FSS is broadening the reach of sustainable forest management beyond certified forests in the SE United States.</description><subject>Alabama</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Forest certification</subject><subject>forest land</subject><subject>forestry</subject><subject>Georgia</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>Southern United States</subject><subject>Sustainable forest management</subject><subject>sustainable forestry</subject><subject>threatened species</subject><subject>water quality</subject><subject>wood</subject><issn>2666-7193</issn><issn>2666-7193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEElXbB-DmI5dd_CdxYnFCVQsrVeph6dmynfHiVWIH27vSPgpvy5QA4sRp7NH3_caer2neMbpllMkPx231y5ZTzvFORateNVdcSrnpmRKv_zm_bW5LOVJKeceYGtqr5sduXoyrhSRP9qdSTYjGTkAeUoZS84XsYqjB1HAG4oOFTEo6ZRfigaRI6jfs_lFaLGQ20RxghljJkhEcHBRi4khsSCNCcgn1QlyKBfIZsQgJK2d_T55xFoxkX02FctO88WYqcPu7XjfPD_df775sHp8-7-4-PW5cK1TdcC9aJ6Toup4ZP1pnpfPcghgG75UFJ_t24IwBeG9UP4zWit5aJgWoznZUXDe7lTsmc9RLDrPJF51M0L8aKR-0yfiPCbQyroeh6zs6ytbKAVGjAwAGyrfcW2S9X1lLTt9PuA89h-JgmkyEdCqaD6LFMJhkKGWr1OVUSgb_dzSj-iVVfdSYqn5JVa-poufj6gHcxzlA1sUFiA7GkMFVfHD4j_snBtGu4Q</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Karnatz, Caroline</creator><creator>Kadam, Parag</creator><creator>Hamilton, Healy</creator><creator>Smyth, Regan</creator><creator>Bawa, Ranjit</creator><creator>Dwivedi, Puneet</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-4205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Impacts of Sustainable Forestry Initiative fiber sourcing on the forestry best management practices and biodiversity conservation in the SE United States</title><author>Karnatz, Caroline ; Kadam, Parag ; Hamilton, Healy ; Smyth, Regan ; Bawa, Ranjit ; Dwivedi, Puneet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2f34c3635571afdbcb6cf2be388ff9bec6748211eeffa978dbb37bb163e95b503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alabama</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Forest certification</topic><topic>forest land</topic><topic>forestry</topic><topic>Georgia</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>Southern United States</topic><topic>Sustainable forest management</topic><topic>sustainable forestry</topic><topic>threatened species</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karnatz, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadam, Parag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Healy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Regan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bawa, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Puneet</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Trees, Forests and People (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karnatz, Caroline</au><au>Kadam, Parag</au><au>Hamilton, Healy</au><au>Smyth, Regan</au><au>Bawa, Ranjit</au><au>Dwivedi, Puneet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of Sustainable Forestry Initiative fiber sourcing on the forestry best management practices and biodiversity conservation in the SE United States</atitle><jtitle>Trees, Forests and People (Online)</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>100349</spage><pages>100349-</pages><artnum>100349</artnum><issn>2666-7193</issn><eissn>2666-7193</eissn><abstract>•BMP rates not different inside, outside, or within certified mills’ sourcing areas.•Habitats biodiversity categories receive similar conservation attention.•SFI FSS certification broadens sustainable forest management in SE United States. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Fiber Sourcing Standard (FSS) aims to extend the reach of sustainable forest management onto uncertified forestlands through the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for water quality and other requirements intended to promote multiple conservation outcomes. Conservation of biological diversity is one of the pillars of the SFI FSS, yet no study has examined its effect on biodiversity conservation at the landscape level. We analyzed BMP implementation rates (inside, outside, and within overlapped wood baskets of certified wood-consuming mills) across five levels (very high, high, medium, low, and very low) biodiversity habitats to measure the impact of the SFI FSS in four states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina) in the SE United States. BMP implementation rates were not significantly different inside, outside, or within multiple wood baskets of mills certified to the SFI FSS. We also find that the SFI FSS facilitates the same level of adherence to sustainable forest practices across various levels of biodiversity habitats, regardless of the presence or absence of imperiled species. High compliance rates across the region indicate that all tracts of land, irrespective of biodiversity categories, typically receive the same level of conservation attention. In this context, the SFI FSS is broadening the reach of sustainable forest management beyond certified forests in the SE United States.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100349</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-4205</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2666-7193
ispartof Trees, Forests and People (Online), 2023-03, Vol.11, p.100349, Article 100349
issn 2666-7193
2666-7193
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9ac7e85750d64b68bb3dceee1e9f42fb
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alabama
Biodiversity
biodiversity conservation
compliance
Florida
Forest certification
forest land
forestry
Georgia
landscapes
South Carolina
Southern United States
Sustainable forest management
sustainable forestry
threatened species
water quality
wood
title Impacts of Sustainable Forestry Initiative fiber sourcing on the forestry best management practices and biodiversity conservation in the SE United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T15%3A58%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Sustainable%20Forestry%20Initiative%20fiber%20sourcing%20on%20the%20forestry%20best%20management%20practices%20and%20biodiversity%20conservation%20in%20the%20SE%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Trees,%20Forests%20and%20People%20(Online)&rft.au=Karnatz,%20Caroline&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=100349&rft.pages=100349-&rft.artnum=100349&rft.issn=2666-7193&rft.eissn=2666-7193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100349&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2834266161%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2f34c3635571afdbcb6cf2be388ff9bec6748211eeffa978dbb37bb163e95b503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2834266161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true