Loading…
The impact of the evaluations made by Mini-CEX on the clinical competency of nursing students
Introduction Clinical competency is defined as one's capabilities in terms of knowledge, attitude and practice, and is a necessity for nursing practice. Evaluation is the inseparable part of the education process, without which the quality of education could not be measured. Considering the cha...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC medical education 2022-08, Vol.22 (1), p.1-634, Article 634 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-9833d10009b1640be7ff177dffb0c0abf6e7567607fd1f37fdb2bef95faff42a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-9833d10009b1640be7ff177dffb0c0abf6e7567607fd1f37fdb2bef95faff42a3 |
container_end_page | 634 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | BMC medical education |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Motefakker, Sanaz Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam Nourian, Manijeh Nasiri, Maliheh Heydari, Fatemeh |
description | Introduction Clinical competency is defined as one's capabilities in terms of knowledge, attitude and practice, and is a necessity for nursing practice. Evaluation is the inseparable part of the education process, without which the quality of education could not be measured. Considering the characteristics of clinical education and its impact on the clinical competency of students, as well as the importance of making precise evaluations of them using scientific, modern and efficient approaches, this study aims to investigate the impact of the evaluation made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise on the clinical competency of the nursing students of the School of Nursing and Midwifery Shahid Behesti University. Methods This is a quasi-experimental study with a control group conducted on students who were taking courses "Nursing care for a sick child". The students were classified into the intervention and control groups using complete enumeration. The evaluations were made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in the intervention group and the portfolio approach in the control group. The skills regarding patient (mother-child) education, IV therapy and medication were evaluated by checklists. Findings The results showed that the mean score of clinical competency in the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group. Conclusion Considering the improvement of clinical competency in the intervention group, it is recommended to use Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise for the evaluation of students. Keywords: Clinical competency, Evaluation, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise, Nursing student |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12909-022-03667-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9aef86ea9cd74962816b84db75b97de0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714545895</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9aef86ea9cd74962816b84db75b97de0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A714545895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-9833d10009b1640be7ff177dffb0c0abf6e7567607fd1f37fdb2bef95faff42a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-Aa8GvPFmar4zuRHKUrVQ8aaCNxLycbLNMpOsk5nC_vtmd4u6IoHk5OQ5bziHt2neYnSJcS8-FEwUUh0ipENUCNmRZ805ZpJ0QhH0_K_4rHlVygYhLHuKXzZnlKteCq7Om59399DGcWvc3ObQzvUGD2ZYzBxzKu1oPLR2136NKXar6x9tTgfGDTXhzNC6PG5hhuR2-_K0TCWmdVvmxUOay-vmRTBDgTdP50Xz_dP13epLd_vt883q6rZznKG5Uz2lHiOElMWCIQsyBCylD8Eih4wNAiQXUiAZPA607pZYCIoHEwIjhl40N0ddn81Gb6c4mmmns4n6kMjTWptpjm4ArQyEXoBRzkumBOmxsD3zVnKrpAdUtT4etbaLHcG72sdkhhPR05cU7_U6P2hF66S5qALvnwSm_GuBMusxFgfDYBLkpWgiEesl6bms6Lt_0E1eplRHVSnMmaBYqT_U2tQGYgq5_uv2ovpKYsYZ7xWv1OV_qLo8jNHlBCHW_EkBORa4KZcyQfjdI0Z6bzB9NJiuBtMHg2lCHwFIvcFt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715463199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of the evaluations made by Mini-CEX on the clinical competency of nursing students</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Motefakker, Sanaz ; Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam ; Nourian, Manijeh ; Nasiri, Maliheh ; Heydari, Fatemeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Motefakker, Sanaz ; Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam ; Nourian, Manijeh ; Nasiri, Maliheh ; Heydari, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Clinical competency is defined as one's capabilities in terms of knowledge, attitude and practice, and is a necessity for nursing practice. Evaluation is the inseparable part of the education process, without which the quality of education could not be measured. Considering the characteristics of clinical education and its impact on the clinical competency of students, as well as the importance of making precise evaluations of them using scientific, modern and efficient approaches, this study aims to investigate the impact of the evaluation made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise on the clinical competency of the nursing students of the School of Nursing and Midwifery Shahid Behesti University. Methods This is a quasi-experimental study with a control group conducted on students who were taking courses "Nursing care for a sick child". The students were classified into the intervention and control groups using complete enumeration. The evaluations were made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in the intervention group and the portfolio approach in the control group. The skills regarding patient (mother-child) education, IV therapy and medication were evaluated by checklists. Findings The results showed that the mean score of clinical competency in the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group. Conclusion Considering the improvement of clinical competency in the intervention group, it is recommended to use Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise for the evaluation of students. Keywords: Clinical competency, Evaluation, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise, Nursing student</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03667-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35987659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical competence ; Clinical competency ; Clinical nursing ; Competence ; Content Validity ; Control Groups ; Coronaviruses ; Correlation ; COVID-19 ; Evaluation ; Evaluators ; Exercise ; Feedback ; Internship Programs ; Internships ; Intervention ; Intravenous therapy ; Learning ; Likert Scales ; Marital Status ; Medical research ; Meetings ; Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise ; Nursing care ; Nursing education ; Nursing skills ; Nursing student ; Nursing Students ; Patient Education ; Pediatrics ; Place of Residence ; Questionnaires ; Rating of ; Reliability ; Researchers ; Sampling ; Student Evaluation ; Student Improvement ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Translation ; Validity ; Work Experience</subject><ispartof>BMC medical education, 2022-08, Vol.22 (1), p.1-634, Article 634</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-9833d10009b1640be7ff177dffb0c0abf6e7567607fd1f37fdb2bef95faff42a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-9833d10009b1640be7ff177dffb0c0abf6e7567607fd1f37fdb2bef95faff42a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392056/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2715463199?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21358,21374,25732,27903,27904,33590,33591,33856,33857,36991,36992,38495,43712,43859,43874,44569,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motefakker, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nourian, Manijeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiri, Maliheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of the evaluations made by Mini-CEX on the clinical competency of nursing students</title><title>BMC medical education</title><description>Introduction Clinical competency is defined as one's capabilities in terms of knowledge, attitude and practice, and is a necessity for nursing practice. Evaluation is the inseparable part of the education process, without which the quality of education could not be measured. Considering the characteristics of clinical education and its impact on the clinical competency of students, as well as the importance of making precise evaluations of them using scientific, modern and efficient approaches, this study aims to investigate the impact of the evaluation made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise on the clinical competency of the nursing students of the School of Nursing and Midwifery Shahid Behesti University. Methods This is a quasi-experimental study with a control group conducted on students who were taking courses "Nursing care for a sick child". The students were classified into the intervention and control groups using complete enumeration. The evaluations were made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in the intervention group and the portfolio approach in the control group. The skills regarding patient (mother-child) education, IV therapy and medication were evaluated by checklists. Findings The results showed that the mean score of clinical competency in the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group. Conclusion Considering the improvement of clinical competency in the intervention group, it is recommended to use Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise for the evaluation of students. Keywords: Clinical competency, Evaluation, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise, Nursing student</description><subject>Clinical competence</subject><subject>Clinical competency</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Content Validity</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Internship Programs</subject><subject>Internships</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Intravenous therapy</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Marital Status</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing skills</subject><subject>Nursing student</subject><subject>Nursing Students</subject><subject>Patient Education</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Place of Residence</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rating of</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Work Experience</subject><issn>1472-6920</issn><issn>1472-6920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-Aa8GvPFmar4zuRHKUrVQ8aaCNxLycbLNMpOsk5nC_vtmd4u6IoHk5OQ5bziHt2neYnSJcS8-FEwUUh0ipENUCNmRZ805ZpJ0QhH0_K_4rHlVygYhLHuKXzZnlKteCq7Om59399DGcWvc3ObQzvUGD2ZYzBxzKu1oPLR2136NKXar6x9tTgfGDTXhzNC6PG5hhuR2-_K0TCWmdVvmxUOay-vmRTBDgTdP50Xz_dP13epLd_vt883q6rZznKG5Uz2lHiOElMWCIQsyBCylD8Eih4wNAiQXUiAZPA607pZYCIoHEwIjhl40N0ddn81Gb6c4mmmns4n6kMjTWptpjm4ArQyEXoBRzkumBOmxsD3zVnKrpAdUtT4etbaLHcG72sdkhhPR05cU7_U6P2hF66S5qALvnwSm_GuBMusxFgfDYBLkpWgiEesl6bms6Lt_0E1eplRHVSnMmaBYqT_U2tQGYgq5_uv2ovpKYsYZ7xWv1OV_qLo8jNHlBCHW_EkBORa4KZcyQfjdI0Z6bzB9NJiuBtMHg2lCHwFIvcFt</recordid><startdate>20220820</startdate><enddate>20220820</enddate><creator>Motefakker, Sanaz</creator><creator>Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam</creator><creator>Nourian, Manijeh</creator><creator>Nasiri, Maliheh</creator><creator>Heydari, Fatemeh</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220820</creationdate><title>The impact of the evaluations made by Mini-CEX on the clinical competency of nursing students</title><author>Motefakker, Sanaz ; Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam ; Nourian, Manijeh ; Nasiri, Maliheh ; Heydari, Fatemeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-9833d10009b1640be7ff177dffb0c0abf6e7567607fd1f37fdb2bef95faff42a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical competence</topic><topic>Clinical competency</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Content Validity</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Internship Programs</topic><topic>Internships</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Intravenous therapy</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Marital Status</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing skills</topic><topic>Nursing student</topic><topic>Nursing Students</topic><topic>Patient Education</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Place of Residence</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rating of</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Work Experience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motefakker, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nourian, Manijeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiri, Maliheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motefakker, Sanaz</au><au>Shirinabadi Farahani, Azam</au><au>Nourian, Manijeh</au><au>Nasiri, Maliheh</au><au>Heydari, Fatemeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of the evaluations made by Mini-CEX on the clinical competency of nursing students</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical education</jtitle><date>2022-08-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>634</epage><pages>1-634</pages><artnum>634</artnum><issn>1472-6920</issn><eissn>1472-6920</eissn><abstract>Introduction Clinical competency is defined as one's capabilities in terms of knowledge, attitude and practice, and is a necessity for nursing practice. Evaluation is the inseparable part of the education process, without which the quality of education could not be measured. Considering the characteristics of clinical education and its impact on the clinical competency of students, as well as the importance of making precise evaluations of them using scientific, modern and efficient approaches, this study aims to investigate the impact of the evaluation made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise on the clinical competency of the nursing students of the School of Nursing and Midwifery Shahid Behesti University. Methods This is a quasi-experimental study with a control group conducted on students who were taking courses "Nursing care for a sick child". The students were classified into the intervention and control groups using complete enumeration. The evaluations were made using Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in the intervention group and the portfolio approach in the control group. The skills regarding patient (mother-child) education, IV therapy and medication were evaluated by checklists. Findings The results showed that the mean score of clinical competency in the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group. Conclusion Considering the improvement of clinical competency in the intervention group, it is recommended to use Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise for the evaluation of students. Keywords: Clinical competency, Evaluation, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise, Nursing student</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35987659</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12909-022-03667-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6920 |
ispartof | BMC medical education, 2022-08, Vol.22 (1), p.1-634, Article 634 |
issn | 1472-6920 1472-6920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9aef86ea9cd74962816b84db75b97de0 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection; PubMed Central (PMC); Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Clinical competence Clinical competency Clinical nursing Competence Content Validity Control Groups Coronaviruses Correlation COVID-19 Evaluation Evaluators Exercise Feedback Internship Programs Internships Intervention Intravenous therapy Learning Likert Scales Marital Status Medical research Meetings Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise Nursing care Nursing education Nursing skills Nursing student Nursing Students Patient Education Pediatrics Place of Residence Questionnaires Rating of Reliability Researchers Sampling Student Evaluation Student Improvement Students Teaching Methods Translation Validity Work Experience |
title | The impact of the evaluations made by Mini-CEX on the clinical competency of nursing students |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20the%20evaluations%20made%20by%20Mini-CEX%20on%20the%20clinical%20competency%20of%20nursing%20students&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20education&rft.au=Motefakker,%20Sanaz&rft.date=2022-08-20&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=634&rft.pages=1-634&rft.artnum=634&rft.issn=1472-6920&rft.eissn=1472-6920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12909-022-03667-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA714545895%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-9833d10009b1640be7ff177dffb0c0abf6e7567607fd1f37fdb2bef95faff42a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715463199&rft_id=info:pmid/35987659&rft_galeid=A714545895&rfr_iscdi=true |