Filtration efficiency of medical and community face masks using viral and bacterial bioaerosols

Face masks are often recommended in community settings to prevent the airborne transmission of respiratory viruses or bacteria. Our first objective was to develop an experimental bench to assess the viral filtration efficiency (VFE) of a mask with a methodology similar to the normative measurement o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2023-05, Vol.13 (1), p.7115-7115, Article 7115
Main Authors: Djeghdir, Sana, Peyron, Aurélien, Sarry, Gwendoline, Leclerc, Lara, Kaouane, Ghalia, Verhoeven, Paul O., Pourchez, Jérémie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
631/326/1321
631/326/41
639/166/985
692/700/459
Airborne microorganisms
Bacteria
Bioengineering
Biological Physics
Efficiency
Filtration
Humanities and Social Sciences
Life Sciences
Masks
Microbiology and Parasitology
multidisciplinary
Physics
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Face masks are often recommended in community settings to prevent the airborne transmission of respiratory viruses or bacteria. Our first objective was to develop an experimental bench to assess the viral filtration efficiency (VFE) of a mask with a methodology similar to the normative measurement of bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) used to determine the filtration performance of medical masks. Then, using three categories of masks of increasing filtration quality (two types of community masks and one type of medical mask), filtration performances measured ranged from 61.4 to 98.8% of BFE and from 65.5 to 99.2% of VFE. A strong correlation (r = 0.983) between bacterial and viral filtration efficiency was observed for all types of masks and for the same droplets size in the 2–3 µm range. This result confirms the relevance of the EN14189:2019 standard using bacterial bioaerosols to evaluate mask filtration, to also extrapolate mask performances whatever their filtration quality against viral bioaerosols. Indeed, it appears that the filtration efficiency of masks (for micrometer droplet sizes and low bioaerosol exposure times) depends mainly on the size of the airborne droplet, rather than on the size of the infectious agent contained in that droplet.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-34283-9