Filtration efficiency of medical and community face masks using viral and bacterial bioaerosols

• Published in: Scientific reports 2023-05, Vol.13 (1), p.7115-7115, Article 7115
• Main Authors: Djeghdir, Sana, Peyron, Aurélien, Sarry, Gwendoline, Leclerc, Lara, Kaouane, Ghalia, Verhoeven, Paul O., Pourchez, Jérémie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 631/326/1321; 631/326/41; 639/166/985; 692/700/459; Airborne microorganisms; Bacteria; Bioengineering; Biological Physics; Efficiency; Filtration; Humanities and Social Sciences; Life Sciences; Masks; Microbiology and Parasitology; multidisciplinary; Physics; Science; Science (multidisciplinary)
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34283-9

Face masks are often recommended in community settings to prevent the airborne transmission of respiratory viruses or bacteria. Our first objective was to develop an experimental bench to assess the viral filtration efficiency (VFE) of a mask with a methodology similar to the normative measurement of bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) used to determine the filtration performance of medical masks. Then, using three categories of masks of increasing filtration quality (two types of community masks and one type of medical mask), filtration performances measured ranged from 61.4 to 98.8% of BFE and from 65.5 to 99.2% of VFE. A strong correlation (r = 0.983) between bacterial and viral filtration efficiency was observed for all types of masks and for the same droplets size in the 2–3 µm range. This result confirms the relevance of the EN14189:2019 standard using bacterial bioaerosols to evaluate mask filtration, to also extrapolate mask performances whatever their filtration quality against viral bioaerosols. Indeed, it appears that the filtration efficiency of masks (for micrometer droplet sizes and low bioaerosol exposure times) depends mainly on the size of the airborne droplet, rather than on the size of the infectious agent contained in that droplet.