Tracking Differences in Cow Temperature Related to Environmental Factors

• Published in: Applied sciences 2024-08, Vol.14 (16), p.7205
• Main Authors: Gálik, Roman, Bod’o, Štefan, Lüttmerding, Gabriel, Knížková, Ivana, Kunc, Petr
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Animal welfare; Animals; Automation; Body temperature; Dairy cattle; Data collection; Farms; heat stress; Humidity; infrared thermography camera; Physiology; relative humidity; temperature; temperature-humidity index; Thermography; Veterinary medicine
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app14167205

The main objective of this work was to investigate the influence of environmental factors, including air temperature (AT), relative humidity (RH) and temperature–humidity index (THI), on the difference between rectal temperature (RT) and eye temperature (ET) of dairy cows. The monitoring of these parameters is important for the further possible introduction of digitalization in animal welfare, especially in dairy cattle. The mean calculated difference between rectal temperature and eye temperature (RT–ET) was 1.5 °C. The average value of AT was 16.4 °C, and the average value of RH was 59.2%. The average value of THI was 60.4. The results of the study showed that, for the temperature difference ET-RT, a low degree of correlation was found both with temperature and with the temperature-humidity index THI (R = 0.22; R = 0.23). However, the observed temperature difference of the animal (ET-RT) showed a moderate degree of dependence on the relative humidity of air (R = −0.32). Although the positive correlation coefficient for AT and THI points to the higher criticality of summer measurements, the negative correlation coefficient for RH supports the use of infrared thermography for determining the temperature of animals even in a moister barn environment.