Loading…

Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal

IntroductionEnsuring adequate access to contraceptive implant removal services requires an understanding of potential clinical, logistical, and geographic challenges. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 39 public health facilities in two districts of Senegal. To assess facility readiness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Global Women's Health 2022-10, Vol.3, p.899543-899543
Main Authors: Brunie, Aurélie, Parker, Caleb, Ndiaye, Salif, Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel, Keyes, Emily B., Lebetkin, Elena, Dioh, Etienne, MacCarthy, James, Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2b96ad66611f0add2568ad49d0b0bca426dbbf5f94bb4043c367aff8fdc772023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2b96ad66611f0add2568ad49d0b0bca426dbbf5f94bb4043c367aff8fdc772023
container_end_page 899543
container_issue
container_start_page 899543
container_title Frontiers in Global Women's Health
container_volume 3
creator Brunie, Aurélie
Parker, Caleb
Ndiaye, Salif
Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel
Keyes, Emily B.
Lebetkin, Elena
Dioh, Etienne
MacCarthy, James
Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia
description IntroductionEnsuring adequate access to contraceptive implant removal services requires an understanding of potential clinical, logistical, and geographic challenges. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 39 public health facilities in two districts of Senegal. To assess facility readiness, we reported the proportion of facilities meeting all minimum conditions for regular and difficult implant removals. We then describe characteristics of referral networks. Geographic access modeling was conducted in a geographic information system to estimate the proportion of women of reproductive age living within specific travel times of facilities ready for regular and difficult removals. Results72% of facilities met all conditions for regular removals, and 8% for difficult removals. In both cases, the main gaps related to equipment availability (79% of facilities had the minimum equipment for regular removals and 8% for difficult removals). 72% of facilities organized in three referral networks sent clients to other facilities for cases they could not manage. Of 11 receiving or single-network facilities, seven were ready for regular removals and one for difficult removals. Altogether, 36% of women in Dakar Centre and 99% of women in Kolda lived within two hours of a facility that was equipped to handle regular removals, compared to 15% and 69%, respectively, for difficult removals. ConclusionData such as those provided in this assessment are important to provide a realistic picture of the state of readiness of the health system and its ability to meet the inevitable demand for implant removals. Referral networks should be considered as an emerging strategy to avail sufficient capacity at the systems level, including for managing difficult removals. However, careful thought should be given to the location of facilities that are ready to receive cases in order to target upgrades.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fgwh.2022.899543
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9bb0c6b89fa749c4acc658c0b36ade87</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9bb0c6b89fa749c4acc658c0b36ade87</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2737468875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2b96ad66611f0add2568ad49d0b0bca426dbbf5f94bb4043c367aff8fdc772023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUs1uGyEYXFWt1CjNvUeOPcQuBpZdeqgUWW1qKVIPac_o429NxC4OYEd5xrxUWduqkhMIhplhvmmazyu8pLQXX93wtF0STMiyF6Jl9F1zQXhHFy1uxftX-4_NVc4PGGPSrgih9KJ5WQc_eQ3hGoU4-Fy8vkYwGTTYOCTYbb1GDnSJKSM_ITvlffLTgMDYxz0Ui0BrmzMqEflxF2AqKNkxHiDkb-gG6RRzXmSri48TBFRfH-wzig7t9iqcuH3wxdt8VL3d3KMxGhtmjYp65eIsVE2Up4hMtZq8LnlG3dvJDhA-NR9c1bVX5_Wy-fvzx5_1r8Xd79vN-uZuoRkVZUGU4GA456uVw2AMaXkPhgmDFVYaGOFGKdc6wZRimFFNeQfO9c7orqsh08tmc-I1ER7kLvkR0rOM4OXxIKZBQqpBBiuFUlhz1QsHHROa1U_wttdY0WrB9l3l-n7iqnmM1mg7lQThDenbm8lv5RAPUnCGOz6b-XImSPFxb3ORo8_ahjoKG_dZko52jPd911YoPkGPU0nW_ZdZYTn3SM49knOP5KlH9B9luMMH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737468875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Brunie, Aurélie ; Parker, Caleb ; Ndiaye, Salif ; Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel ; Keyes, Emily B. ; Lebetkin, Elena ; Dioh, Etienne ; MacCarthy, James ; Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunie, Aurélie ; Parker, Caleb ; Ndiaye, Salif ; Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel ; Keyes, Emily B. ; Lebetkin, Elena ; Dioh, Etienne ; MacCarthy, James ; Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionEnsuring adequate access to contraceptive implant removal services requires an understanding of potential clinical, logistical, and geographic challenges. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 39 public health facilities in two districts of Senegal. To assess facility readiness, we reported the proportion of facilities meeting all minimum conditions for regular and difficult implant removals. We then describe characteristics of referral networks. Geographic access modeling was conducted in a geographic information system to estimate the proportion of women of reproductive age living within specific travel times of facilities ready for regular and difficult removals. Results72% of facilities met all conditions for regular removals, and 8% for difficult removals. In both cases, the main gaps related to equipment availability (79% of facilities had the minimum equipment for regular removals and 8% for difficult removals). 72% of facilities organized in three referral networks sent clients to other facilities for cases they could not manage. Of 11 receiving or single-network facilities, seven were ready for regular removals and one for difficult removals. Altogether, 36% of women in Dakar Centre and 99% of women in Kolda lived within two hours of a facility that was equipped to handle regular removals, compared to 15% and 69%, respectively, for difficult removals. ConclusionData such as those provided in this assessment are important to provide a realistic picture of the state of readiness of the health system and its ability to meet the inevitable demand for implant removals. Referral networks should be considered as an emerging strategy to avail sufficient capacity at the systems level, including for managing difficult removals. However, careful thought should be given to the location of facilities that are ready to receive cases in order to target upgrades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2673-5059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2673-5059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.899543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>contraception ; contraceptive implant ; Global Women's Health ; long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) ; removals ; Senegal ; sub-Sahara Africa (SSA)</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in Global Women's Health, 2022-10, Vol.3, p.899543-899543</ispartof><rights>2022 Brunie, Parker, Ndiaye, Sarr Aw, Keyes, Lebetkin, Dioh, MacCarthy and Ndiaye. 2022 Brunie, Parker, Ndiaye, Sarr Aw, Keyes, Lebetkin, Dioh, MacCarthy and Ndiaye</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2b96ad66611f0add2568ad49d0b0bca426dbbf5f94bb4043c367aff8fdc772023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2b96ad66611f0add2568ad49d0b0bca426dbbf5f94bb4043c367aff8fdc772023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640762/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640762/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunie, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndiaye, Salif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebetkin, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dioh, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCarthy, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal</title><title>Frontiers in Global Women's Health</title><description>IntroductionEnsuring adequate access to contraceptive implant removal services requires an understanding of potential clinical, logistical, and geographic challenges. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 39 public health facilities in two districts of Senegal. To assess facility readiness, we reported the proportion of facilities meeting all minimum conditions for regular and difficult implant removals. We then describe characteristics of referral networks. Geographic access modeling was conducted in a geographic information system to estimate the proportion of women of reproductive age living within specific travel times of facilities ready for regular and difficult removals. Results72% of facilities met all conditions for regular removals, and 8% for difficult removals. In both cases, the main gaps related to equipment availability (79% of facilities had the minimum equipment for regular removals and 8% for difficult removals). 72% of facilities organized in three referral networks sent clients to other facilities for cases they could not manage. Of 11 receiving or single-network facilities, seven were ready for regular removals and one for difficult removals. Altogether, 36% of women in Dakar Centre and 99% of women in Kolda lived within two hours of a facility that was equipped to handle regular removals, compared to 15% and 69%, respectively, for difficult removals. ConclusionData such as those provided in this assessment are important to provide a realistic picture of the state of readiness of the health system and its ability to meet the inevitable demand for implant removals. Referral networks should be considered as an emerging strategy to avail sufficient capacity at the systems level, including for managing difficult removals. However, careful thought should be given to the location of facilities that are ready to receive cases in order to target upgrades.</description><subject>contraception</subject><subject>contraceptive implant</subject><subject>Global Women's Health</subject><subject>long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)</subject><subject>removals</subject><subject>Senegal</subject><subject>sub-Sahara Africa (SSA)</subject><issn>2673-5059</issn><issn>2673-5059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUs1uGyEYXFWt1CjNvUeOPcQuBpZdeqgUWW1qKVIPac_o429NxC4OYEd5xrxUWduqkhMIhplhvmmazyu8pLQXX93wtF0STMiyF6Jl9F1zQXhHFy1uxftX-4_NVc4PGGPSrgih9KJ5WQc_eQ3hGoU4-Fy8vkYwGTTYOCTYbb1GDnSJKSM_ITvlffLTgMDYxz0Ui0BrmzMqEflxF2AqKNkxHiDkb-gG6RRzXmSri48TBFRfH-wzig7t9iqcuH3wxdt8VL3d3KMxGhtmjYp65eIsVE2Up4hMtZq8LnlG3dvJDhA-NR9c1bVX5_Wy-fvzx5_1r8Xd79vN-uZuoRkVZUGU4GA456uVw2AMaXkPhgmDFVYaGOFGKdc6wZRimFFNeQfO9c7orqsh08tmc-I1ER7kLvkR0rOM4OXxIKZBQqpBBiuFUlhz1QsHHROa1U_wttdY0WrB9l3l-n7iqnmM1mg7lQThDenbm8lv5RAPUnCGOz6b-XImSPFxb3ORo8_ahjoKG_dZko52jPd911YoPkGPU0nW_ZdZYTn3SM49knOP5KlH9B9luMMH</recordid><startdate>20221025</startdate><enddate>20221025</enddate><creator>Brunie, Aurélie</creator><creator>Parker, Caleb</creator><creator>Ndiaye, Salif</creator><creator>Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel</creator><creator>Keyes, Emily B.</creator><creator>Lebetkin, Elena</creator><creator>Dioh, Etienne</creator><creator>MacCarthy, James</creator><creator>Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221025</creationdate><title>Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal</title><author>Brunie, Aurélie ; Parker, Caleb ; Ndiaye, Salif ; Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel ; Keyes, Emily B. ; Lebetkin, Elena ; Dioh, Etienne ; MacCarthy, James ; Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2b96ad66611f0add2568ad49d0b0bca426dbbf5f94bb4043c367aff8fdc772023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>contraception</topic><topic>contraceptive implant</topic><topic>Global Women's Health</topic><topic>long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)</topic><topic>removals</topic><topic>Senegal</topic><topic>sub-Sahara Africa (SSA)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunie, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndiaye, Salif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebetkin, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dioh, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCarthy, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in Global Women's Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunie, Aurélie</au><au>Parker, Caleb</au><au>Ndiaye, Salif</au><au>Sarr Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel</au><au>Keyes, Emily B.</au><au>Lebetkin, Elena</au><au>Dioh, Etienne</au><au>MacCarthy, James</au><au>Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in Global Women's Health</jtitle><date>2022-10-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>3</volume><spage>899543</spage><epage>899543</epage><pages>899543-899543</pages><issn>2673-5059</issn><eissn>2673-5059</eissn><abstract>IntroductionEnsuring adequate access to contraceptive implant removal services requires an understanding of potential clinical, logistical, and geographic challenges. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 39 public health facilities in two districts of Senegal. To assess facility readiness, we reported the proportion of facilities meeting all minimum conditions for regular and difficult implant removals. We then describe characteristics of referral networks. Geographic access modeling was conducted in a geographic information system to estimate the proportion of women of reproductive age living within specific travel times of facilities ready for regular and difficult removals. Results72% of facilities met all conditions for regular removals, and 8% for difficult removals. In both cases, the main gaps related to equipment availability (79% of facilities had the minimum equipment for regular removals and 8% for difficult removals). 72% of facilities organized in three referral networks sent clients to other facilities for cases they could not manage. Of 11 receiving or single-network facilities, seven were ready for regular removals and one for difficult removals. Altogether, 36% of women in Dakar Centre and 99% of women in Kolda lived within two hours of a facility that was equipped to handle regular removals, compared to 15% and 69%, respectively, for difficult removals. ConclusionData such as those provided in this assessment are important to provide a realistic picture of the state of readiness of the health system and its ability to meet the inevitable demand for implant removals. Referral networks should be considered as an emerging strategy to avail sufficient capacity at the systems level, including for managing difficult removals. However, careful thought should be given to the location of facilities that are ready to receive cases in order to target upgrades.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><doi>10.3389/fgwh.2022.899543</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2673-5059
ispartof Frontiers in Global Women's Health, 2022-10, Vol.3, p.899543-899543
issn 2673-5059
2673-5059
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9bb0c6b89fa749c4acc658c0b36ade87
source PubMed Central (Open Access)
subjects contraception
contraceptive implant
Global Women's Health
long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)
removals
Senegal
sub-Sahara Africa (SSA)
title Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A49%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical,%20logistic,%20and%20geographic%20factors%20in%20ensuring%20adequate%20access%20to%20implant%20removals:%20A%20cross-sectional%20survey%20of%20public%20facilities%20and%20GIS%20modeling%20of%20geographic%20access%20in%20two%20districts%20of%20Senegal&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20Global%20Women's%20Health&rft.au=Brunie,%20Aur%C3%A9lie&rft.date=2022-10-25&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=899543&rft.epage=899543&rft.pages=899543-899543&rft.issn=2673-5059&rft.eissn=2673-5059&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fgwh.2022.899543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2737468875%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-2b96ad66611f0add2568ad49d0b0bca426dbbf5f94bb4043c367aff8fdc772023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737468875&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true