Loading…

The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences

This paper investigates to what extent speakers adapt to unfamiliar consonant cluster timing patterns. We exploit naturally occurring consonant overlap differences between German and Georgian speakers' productions to probe the constraints that language-specific patterns put on the flexibility o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Laboratory phonology 2020-01, Vol.11 (1)
Main Authors: Pouplier, Marianne, Lentz, Tomas O., Chitoran, Ioana, Hoole, Philip
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-e269a35c196f3b74e31cd49d3ccd785bf420aff7850c6c29858edbbb6d45cab83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-e269a35c196f3b74e31cd49d3ccd785bf420aff7850c6c29858edbbb6d45cab83
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Laboratory phonology
container_volume 11
creator Pouplier, Marianne
Lentz, Tomas O.
Chitoran, Ioana
Hoole, Philip
description This paper investigates to what extent speakers adapt to unfamiliar consonant cluster timing patterns. We exploit naturally occurring consonant overlap differences between German and Georgian speakers' productions to probe the constraints that language-specific patterns put on the flexibility of cluster articulation. We recorded articulography data from Georgian and German speakers imitating CCV clusters as produced by a German and Georgian audio model, respectively. The German participants adapted their relative overlap towards the Georgian audio model to various degrees depending on whether the cluster was phonotactically familiar to them or not. A higher degree of adaptation was observed for clusters phonotactically illegal in German. Phonotactically legal clusters showed only an intermediate degree of articulatory adaptation, even though acoustically these clusters showed a rather strong move towards the Georgian audio model in terms of the aerodynamics of the interconsonantal transition period. Georgian speakers on the other hand failed to adapt to the German audio model articulatorily and acoustically, possibly because the German cluster inventory is a subset of the Georgian inventory. This means that Georgian speakers can draw on native speaker knowledge for all clusters, which is a factor known to constrain imitation. Also language-specific cue weighting effects may partly condition the results.
doi_str_mv 10.5334/labphon.195
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9c0837021f6c48c190d34125f55cee04</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9c0837021f6c48c190d34125f55cee04</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03127373v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-e269a35c196f3b74e31cd49d3ccd785bf420aff7850c6c29858edbbb6d45cab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LJDEQbcQFxfW0fyBXWUaTrqQ_jiKuCgNe3HOork6cSCYZk8zC4J_fjCOidamqV69eUbym-SX4pQKQVx6nzSqGSzGqo-ZUDN2w6EDJ4y_1SXOe8wuvAaPi0J82b08rw9zaFSwuBhYto4ipONp6LDHtWKnD8Mw2WIpJITMXKiPkGDAURn6bK5yZjYntj8eCVJfR-x2zuHbeYWIYZrYNn202r1sTyOSfzQ-LPpvzj3zW_P1z-3Rzv1g-3j3cXC8XJKEvC9N2I4IiMXYWpl4aEDTLcQaiuR_UZGXL0dpacuqoHQc1mHmapm6WinAa4Kx5OOjOEV_0Jrk1pp2O6PQ7ENOzfn_ZGz0SH6DnrbAdyaGe5DNI0SqrFBnDZdW6OGit0H-Tur9e6j3GQbQ99PBPVO7vA5dSzDkZ-7kguN5bpj8s09Uy-A-vMY3H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Pouplier, Marianne ; Lentz, Tomas O. ; Chitoran, Ioana ; Hoole, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Pouplier, Marianne ; Lentz, Tomas O. ; Chitoran, Ioana ; Hoole, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates to what extent speakers adapt to unfamiliar consonant cluster timing patterns. We exploit naturally occurring consonant overlap differences between German and Georgian speakers' productions to probe the constraints that language-specific patterns put on the flexibility of cluster articulation. We recorded articulography data from Georgian and German speakers imitating CCV clusters as produced by a German and Georgian audio model, respectively. The German participants adapted their relative overlap towards the Georgian audio model to various degrees depending on whether the cluster was phonotactically familiar to them or not. A higher degree of adaptation was observed for clusters phonotactically illegal in German. Phonotactically legal clusters showed only an intermediate degree of articulatory adaptation, even though acoustically these clusters showed a rather strong move towards the Georgian audio model in terms of the aerodynamics of the interconsonantal transition period. Georgian speakers on the other hand failed to adapt to the German audio model articulatorily and acoustically, possibly because the German cluster inventory is a subset of the Georgian inventory. This means that Georgian speakers can draw on native speaker knowledge for all clusters, which is a factor known to constrain imitation. Also language-specific cue weighting effects may partly condition the results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-6354</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1868-6346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-6354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5334/labphon.195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ubiquity Press</publisher><subject>articulatory timing ; clusters ; coarticulation ; Cognitive science ; German ; imitation ; Linguistics</subject><ispartof>Laboratory phonology, 2020-01, Vol.11 (1)</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-e269a35c196f3b74e31cd49d3ccd785bf420aff7850c6c29858edbbb6d45cab83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-e269a35c196f3b74e31cd49d3ccd785bf420aff7850c6c29858edbbb6d45cab83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0773-2680</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03127373$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pouplier, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lentz, Tomas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitoran, Ioana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoole, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences</title><title>Laboratory phonology</title><description>This paper investigates to what extent speakers adapt to unfamiliar consonant cluster timing patterns. We exploit naturally occurring consonant overlap differences between German and Georgian speakers' productions to probe the constraints that language-specific patterns put on the flexibility of cluster articulation. We recorded articulography data from Georgian and German speakers imitating CCV clusters as produced by a German and Georgian audio model, respectively. The German participants adapted their relative overlap towards the Georgian audio model to various degrees depending on whether the cluster was phonotactically familiar to them or not. A higher degree of adaptation was observed for clusters phonotactically illegal in German. Phonotactically legal clusters showed only an intermediate degree of articulatory adaptation, even though acoustically these clusters showed a rather strong move towards the Georgian audio model in terms of the aerodynamics of the interconsonantal transition period. Georgian speakers on the other hand failed to adapt to the German audio model articulatorily and acoustically, possibly because the German cluster inventory is a subset of the Georgian inventory. This means that Georgian speakers can draw on native speaker knowledge for all clusters, which is a factor known to constrain imitation. Also language-specific cue weighting effects may partly condition the results.</description><subject>articulatory timing</subject><subject>clusters</subject><subject>coarticulation</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>German</subject><subject>imitation</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><issn>1868-6354</issn><issn>1868-6346</issn><issn>1868-6354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1LJDEQbcQFxfW0fyBXWUaTrqQ_jiKuCgNe3HOork6cSCYZk8zC4J_fjCOidamqV69eUbym-SX4pQKQVx6nzSqGSzGqo-ZUDN2w6EDJ4y_1SXOe8wuvAaPi0J82b08rw9zaFSwuBhYto4ipONp6LDHtWKnD8Mw2WIpJITMXKiPkGDAURn6bK5yZjYntj8eCVJfR-x2zuHbeYWIYZrYNn202r1sTyOSfzQ-LPpvzj3zW_P1z-3Rzv1g-3j3cXC8XJKEvC9N2I4IiMXYWpl4aEDTLcQaiuR_UZGXL0dpacuqoHQc1mHmapm6WinAa4Kx5OOjOEV_0Jrk1pp2O6PQ7ENOzfn_ZGz0SH6DnrbAdyaGe5DNI0SqrFBnDZdW6OGit0H-Tur9e6j3GQbQ99PBPVO7vA5dSzDkZ-7kguN5bpj8s09Uy-A-vMY3H</recordid><startdate>20200124</startdate><enddate>20200124</enddate><creator>Pouplier, Marianne</creator><creator>Lentz, Tomas O.</creator><creator>Chitoran, Ioana</creator><creator>Hoole, Philip</creator><general>Ubiquity Press</general><general>Open Library of Humanities</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0773-2680</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200124</creationdate><title>The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences</title><author>Pouplier, Marianne ; Lentz, Tomas O. ; Chitoran, Ioana ; Hoole, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-e269a35c196f3b74e31cd49d3ccd785bf420aff7850c6c29858edbbb6d45cab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>articulatory timing</topic><topic>clusters</topic><topic>coarticulation</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>German</topic><topic>imitation</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pouplier, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lentz, Tomas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitoran, Ioana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoole, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Laboratory phonology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pouplier, Marianne</au><au>Lentz, Tomas O.</au><au>Chitoran, Ioana</au><au>Hoole, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences</atitle><jtitle>Laboratory phonology</jtitle><date>2020-01-24</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1868-6354</issn><issn>1868-6346</issn><eissn>1868-6354</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates to what extent speakers adapt to unfamiliar consonant cluster timing patterns. We exploit naturally occurring consonant overlap differences between German and Georgian speakers' productions to probe the constraints that language-specific patterns put on the flexibility of cluster articulation. We recorded articulography data from Georgian and German speakers imitating CCV clusters as produced by a German and Georgian audio model, respectively. The German participants adapted their relative overlap towards the Georgian audio model to various degrees depending on whether the cluster was phonotactically familiar to them or not. A higher degree of adaptation was observed for clusters phonotactically illegal in German. Phonotactically legal clusters showed only an intermediate degree of articulatory adaptation, even though acoustically these clusters showed a rather strong move towards the Georgian audio model in terms of the aerodynamics of the interconsonantal transition period. Georgian speakers on the other hand failed to adapt to the German audio model articulatorily and acoustically, possibly because the German cluster inventory is a subset of the Georgian inventory. This means that Georgian speakers can draw on native speaker knowledge for all clusters, which is a factor known to constrain imitation. Also language-specific cue weighting effects may partly condition the results.</abstract><pub>Ubiquity Press</pub><doi>10.5334/labphon.195</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0773-2680</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-6354
ispartof Laboratory phonology, 2020-01, Vol.11 (1)
issn 1868-6354
1868-6346
1868-6354
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9c0837021f6c48c190d34125f55cee04
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects articulatory timing
clusters
coarticulation
Cognitive science
German
imitation
Linguistics
title The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A58%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20imitation%20of%20coarticulatory%20timing%20patterns%20in%20consonant%20clusters%20for%20phonotactically%20familiar%20and%20unfamiliar%20sequences&rft.jtitle=Laboratory%20phonology&rft.au=Pouplier,%20Marianne&rft.date=2020-01-24&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1868-6354&rft.eissn=1868-6354&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334/labphon.195&rft_dat=%3Chal_doaj_%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03127373v1%3C/hal_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-e269a35c196f3b74e31cd49d3ccd785bf420aff7850c6c29858edbbb6d45cab83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true