Analyzing the behavior of a porous nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) composite for healing of bone defects

• Published in: International journal of nanomedicine 2014-01, Vol.9 (Issue 1), p.485-494
• Main Authors: Xiong, Yan, Ren, Cheng, Zhang, Bin, Yang, Hongsheng, Lang, Yun, Min, Li, Zhang, Wenli, Pei, Fuxing, Yan, Yonggang, Li, Hong, Mo, Anchun, Tu, Chongqi, Duan, Hong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Animals; artificial bone materials; biomaterial; bone defects healing; Bone Diseases - diagnostic imaging; Bone Diseases - therapy; bone grafting; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Bone Neoplasms - therapy; Bone Substitutes - administration & dosage; Bone Substitutes - chemistry; Bone Transplantation - methods; Durapatite - administration & dosage; Durapatite - chemistry; Female; Humans; Male; Materials Testing; Middle Aged; Nanocomposites - administration & dosage; Nanocomposites - chemistry; Nanomedicine; Nylons - chemistry; Original Research; Osseointegration; Physiological aspects; Polyamides; Porosity; porous n-HA/PA66 composite (n-HA/PA66); Properties; Rabbits; Radiography; Retrospective Studies; Wound healing; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1178-2013; 1176-9114; 1178-2013
• DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s52990

The aim of this study was to analyze the behavior of the porous nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) composite grafted for bone defect repair through a series of biological safety experiments, animal experiments, and a more than 5-year long clinical follow-up. The biological safety experiments, carried out in accordance with the Chinese Guo Biao and Tolerancing (GB/T)16886 and GB/T16175, revealed that porous n-HA/PA66 composite had no cytotoxicity, no sensitization effect, no pyrogenic reaction, and that its hemolysis rate was 0.59% (less than 5%). Rabbit models of tibia defects with grafted porous n-HA/PA66 composite were established. After 2 weeks, the experiment showed that osteogenesis was detected in the porous n-HA/PA66 composite; the density of new bone formation was similar to the surrounding host bone at 12 weeks. After 26 weeks, the artificial bone rebuilt to lamellar bone completely. In the clinical study, a retrospective review was carried out for 21 patients who underwent serial radiographic assessment after treatment with porous n-HA/PA66 composite grafts following bone tumor resection. All wounds healed to grade A. No postoperative infections, delayed deep infection, nonspecific inflammation, rejection, or fractures were encountered. At a mean follow-up of 5.3 years, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society's (MSTS) 93 score was 29.3 points (range: 28-30 points) and mean radiopaque density ratio was 0.77±0.10. The radiologic analysis showed that porous n-HA/PA66 composite had been completely incorporated with the host bone about 1.5 years later. In conclusion, this study indicated that the porous n-HA/PA66 composite had biological safety, and good biocompatibility, osteoinduction, and osseointegration. Thus, the porous n-HA/PA66 composite is an ideal artificial bone substitute and worthy of promotion in the field.