Loading…
Spatiotemporal variation of the carbon footprint of tobacco production from 2004 to 2017 in China
Introduction: Tobacco, as a significant cash crop in China, warrants a comprehensive investigation into the spatiotemporal dynamics of its carbon footprint in order to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and foster low-carbon, environmentally friendly agricultural practices. Methods: Employing th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in environmental science 2024-04, Vol.12 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-c001c7a986aea28c10a9f611c9749248e16e7d91065c512df5d65a663a7ff3613 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Frontiers in environmental science |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Zheng, Yu Qin, Yanqing Duan, Weidong Dong, Wenshuai Zhang, Xi Yin, Guangting Li, Changgen Song, Zonghao Xie, Liangwen Zhan, Lei Ti, Jinsong |
description | Introduction:
Tobacco, as a significant cash crop in China, warrants a comprehensive investigation into the spatiotemporal dynamics of its carbon footprint in order to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and foster low-carbon, environmentally friendly agricultural practices.
Methods:
Employing the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this study aims to scrutinize the temporal variations in the carbon footprint across different functional units of tobacco production in China from 2004 to 2017, thereby elucidating its composition and key influencing factors.
Results and Discussion:
The findings reveal that the average carbon footprint per unit area and per unit yield of tobacco production in China during the aforementioned period amounted to 4,098.99 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 1.97 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, respectively, exhibiting an upward trend over time. Notably, fertilizer and agricultural films emerged as the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese tobacco production, accounting for 26.63% and 24.54% of the total emissions, respectively. Remarkably divergent carbon footprints were observed among various provinces in China. Specifically, Jiangxi, Hunan, and Guangdong exhibited the highest carbon footprints per unit area, with values of 4,908.65 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 4,852.90 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 4,833.56 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Likewise, Jiangxi, Fujian, and Yunnan recorded the highest carbon footprints per unit yield, reaching 2.31 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, 2.23 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
and 2.22 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
-1
, respectively. Conversely, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Jilin, and Heilongjiang exhibited lower carbon footprints per unit area, namely, 3,952.06 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,751.08 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 2,935.81 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,264.83 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 2,830.92 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Moreover, these regions displayed both high yield and productivity. This investigation highlights the significance of implementing measures such as scientific fertilization, reducing agricultural film usage, and expediting the mechanization process of tobacco cultivation to foster the development of an environmentally sustainable tobacco industry in China. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1331530 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9c1bf6f037fa4dde889eb65d026fda5a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9c1bf6f037fa4dde889eb65d026fda5a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3040140100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-c001c7a986aea28c10a9f611c9749248e16e7d91065c512df5d65a663a7ff3613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQXUTBUvsHPC14bp1JNtnNUYofhYIHFbyFaT7slnazZrcF_73ptogQmMybx5s3vCy7RZhxXql775pDN2PAihlyjoLDRTZiTMmplOLz8t__Opt03QYAkDNRII4yemupr0Pvdm2ItM0PFOsj0OTB5_3a5YbiKnU-hL6NddMPeFiRMSFvY7B7M7B9DLucARRpmCqWed3k83Xd0E125Wnbucm5jrOPp8f3-ct0-fq8mD8sp4Zz2U9NMmVKUpUkR6wyCKS8RDSqLBQrKofSlVYhSGEEMuuFlYKk5FR6zyXycbY46dpAG5287ij-6EC1HoAQvzTFvjZbp5XBlZceeOmpsNZVlXIrKSww6S0JSlp3J6104ffedb3ehH1skn3NoQBMDyCx2IllYui66PzfVgR9TEYPyehjMvqcDP8FVyuBNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3040140100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatiotemporal variation of the carbon footprint of tobacco production from 2004 to 2017 in China</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Zheng, Yu ; Qin, Yanqing ; Duan, Weidong ; Dong, Wenshuai ; Zhang, Xi ; Yin, Guangting ; Li, Changgen ; Song, Zonghao ; Xie, Liangwen ; Zhan, Lei ; Ti, Jinsong</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yu ; Qin, Yanqing ; Duan, Weidong ; Dong, Wenshuai ; Zhang, Xi ; Yin, Guangting ; Li, Changgen ; Song, Zonghao ; Xie, Liangwen ; Zhan, Lei ; Ti, Jinsong</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:
Tobacco, as a significant cash crop in China, warrants a comprehensive investigation into the spatiotemporal dynamics of its carbon footprint in order to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and foster low-carbon, environmentally friendly agricultural practices.
Methods:
Employing the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this study aims to scrutinize the temporal variations in the carbon footprint across different functional units of tobacco production in China from 2004 to 2017, thereby elucidating its composition and key influencing factors.
Results and Discussion:
The findings reveal that the average carbon footprint per unit area and per unit yield of tobacco production in China during the aforementioned period amounted to 4,098.99 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 1.97 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, respectively, exhibiting an upward trend over time. Notably, fertilizer and agricultural films emerged as the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese tobacco production, accounting for 26.63% and 24.54% of the total emissions, respectively. Remarkably divergent carbon footprints were observed among various provinces in China. Specifically, Jiangxi, Hunan, and Guangdong exhibited the highest carbon footprints per unit area, with values of 4,908.65 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 4,852.90 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 4,833.56 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Likewise, Jiangxi, Fujian, and Yunnan recorded the highest carbon footprints per unit yield, reaching 2.31 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, 2.23 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
and 2.22 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
-1
, respectively. Conversely, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Jilin, and Heilongjiang exhibited lower carbon footprints per unit area, namely, 3,952.06 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,751.08 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 2,935.81 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,264.83 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 2,830.92 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Moreover, these regions displayed both high yield and productivity. This investigation highlights the significance of implementing measures such as scientific fertilization, reducing agricultural film usage, and expediting the mechanization process of tobacco cultivation to foster the development of an environmentally sustainable tobacco industry in China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2296-665X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2296-665X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1331530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Frontiers Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Biological fertilization ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon footprint ; Cash crops ; Climate change ; emission reduction ; Emissions ; Farm buildings ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Footprint analysis ; global warming ; Greenhouse gases ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycles ; Mechanization ; Sustainable development ; Temporal variations ; Tobacco ; Tobacco industry</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in environmental science, 2024-04, Vol.12</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-c001c7a986aea28c10a9f611c9749248e16e7d91065c512df5d65a663a7ff3613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3040140100/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3040140100?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Wenshuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Guangting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Changgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Zonghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Liangwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, Jinsong</creatorcontrib><title>Spatiotemporal variation of the carbon footprint of tobacco production from 2004 to 2017 in China</title><title>Frontiers in environmental science</title><description>Introduction:
Tobacco, as a significant cash crop in China, warrants a comprehensive investigation into the spatiotemporal dynamics of its carbon footprint in order to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and foster low-carbon, environmentally friendly agricultural practices.
Methods:
Employing the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this study aims to scrutinize the temporal variations in the carbon footprint across different functional units of tobacco production in China from 2004 to 2017, thereby elucidating its composition and key influencing factors.
Results and Discussion:
The findings reveal that the average carbon footprint per unit area and per unit yield of tobacco production in China during the aforementioned period amounted to 4,098.99 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 1.97 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, respectively, exhibiting an upward trend over time. Notably, fertilizer and agricultural films emerged as the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese tobacco production, accounting for 26.63% and 24.54% of the total emissions, respectively. Remarkably divergent carbon footprints were observed among various provinces in China. Specifically, Jiangxi, Hunan, and Guangdong exhibited the highest carbon footprints per unit area, with values of 4,908.65 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 4,852.90 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 4,833.56 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Likewise, Jiangxi, Fujian, and Yunnan recorded the highest carbon footprints per unit yield, reaching 2.31 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, 2.23 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
and 2.22 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
-1
, respectively. Conversely, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Jilin, and Heilongjiang exhibited lower carbon footprints per unit area, namely, 3,952.06 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,751.08 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 2,935.81 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,264.83 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 2,830.92 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Moreover, these regions displayed both high yield and productivity. This investigation highlights the significance of implementing measures such as scientific fertilization, reducing agricultural film usage, and expediting the mechanization process of tobacco cultivation to foster the development of an environmentally sustainable tobacco industry in China.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biological fertilization</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon footprint</subject><subject>Cash crops</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>emission reduction</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Footprint analysis</subject><subject>global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Mechanization</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco industry</subject><issn>2296-665X</issn><issn>2296-665X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQXUTBUvsHPC14bp1JNtnNUYofhYIHFbyFaT7slnazZrcF_73ptogQmMybx5s3vCy7RZhxXql775pDN2PAihlyjoLDRTZiTMmplOLz8t__Opt03QYAkDNRII4yemupr0Pvdm2ItM0PFOsj0OTB5_3a5YbiKnU-hL6NddMPeFiRMSFvY7B7M7B9DLucARRpmCqWed3k83Xd0E125Wnbucm5jrOPp8f3-ct0-fq8mD8sp4Zz2U9NMmVKUpUkR6wyCKS8RDSqLBQrKofSlVYhSGEEMuuFlYKk5FR6zyXycbY46dpAG5287ij-6EC1HoAQvzTFvjZbp5XBlZceeOmpsNZVlXIrKSww6S0JSlp3J6104ffedb3ehH1skn3NoQBMDyCx2IllYui66PzfVgR9TEYPyehjMvqcDP8FVyuBNw</recordid><startdate>20240418</startdate><enddate>20240418</enddate><creator>Zheng, Yu</creator><creator>Qin, Yanqing</creator><creator>Duan, Weidong</creator><creator>Dong, Wenshuai</creator><creator>Zhang, Xi</creator><creator>Yin, Guangting</creator><creator>Li, Changgen</creator><creator>Song, Zonghao</creator><creator>Xie, Liangwen</creator><creator>Zhan, Lei</creator><creator>Ti, Jinsong</creator><general>Frontiers Research Foundation</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240418</creationdate><title>Spatiotemporal variation of the carbon footprint of tobacco production from 2004 to 2017 in China</title><author>Zheng, Yu ; Qin, Yanqing ; Duan, Weidong ; Dong, Wenshuai ; Zhang, Xi ; Yin, Guangting ; Li, Changgen ; Song, Zonghao ; Xie, Liangwen ; Zhan, Lei ; Ti, Jinsong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-c001c7a986aea28c10a9f611c9749248e16e7d91065c512df5d65a663a7ff3613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biological fertilization</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon footprint</topic><topic>Cash crops</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>emission reduction</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Footprint analysis</topic><topic>global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Mechanization</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Wenshuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Guangting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Changgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Zonghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Liangwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, Jinsong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Yu</au><au>Qin, Yanqing</au><au>Duan, Weidong</au><au>Dong, Wenshuai</au><au>Zhang, Xi</au><au>Yin, Guangting</au><au>Li, Changgen</au><au>Song, Zonghao</au><au>Xie, Liangwen</au><au>Zhan, Lei</au><au>Ti, Jinsong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatiotemporal variation of the carbon footprint of tobacco production from 2004 to 2017 in China</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in environmental science</jtitle><date>2024-04-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issn>2296-665X</issn><eissn>2296-665X</eissn><abstract>Introduction:
Tobacco, as a significant cash crop in China, warrants a comprehensive investigation into the spatiotemporal dynamics of its carbon footprint in order to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and foster low-carbon, environmentally friendly agricultural practices.
Methods:
Employing the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this study aims to scrutinize the temporal variations in the carbon footprint across different functional units of tobacco production in China from 2004 to 2017, thereby elucidating its composition and key influencing factors.
Results and Discussion:
The findings reveal that the average carbon footprint per unit area and per unit yield of tobacco production in China during the aforementioned period amounted to 4,098.99 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 1.97 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, respectively, exhibiting an upward trend over time. Notably, fertilizer and agricultural films emerged as the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese tobacco production, accounting for 26.63% and 24.54% of the total emissions, respectively. Remarkably divergent carbon footprints were observed among various provinces in China. Specifically, Jiangxi, Hunan, and Guangdong exhibited the highest carbon footprints per unit area, with values of 4,908.65 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 4,852.90 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 4,833.56 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Likewise, Jiangxi, Fujian, and Yunnan recorded the highest carbon footprints per unit yield, reaching 2.31 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
, 2.23 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
−1
and 2.22 kg CO
2
-eq∙kg
-1
, respectively. Conversely, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Jilin, and Heilongjiang exhibited lower carbon footprints per unit area, namely, 3,952.06 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,751.08 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 2,935.81 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, 3,264.83 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
and 2,830.92 kg CO
2
-eq∙ha
−1
, respectively. Moreover, these regions displayed both high yield and productivity. This investigation highlights the significance of implementing measures such as scientific fertilization, reducing agricultural film usage, and expediting the mechanization process of tobacco cultivation to foster the development of an environmentally sustainable tobacco industry in China.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Frontiers Research Foundation</pub><doi>10.3389/fenvs.2024.1331530</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2296-665X |
ispartof | Frontiers in environmental science, 2024-04, Vol.12 |
issn | 2296-665X 2296-665X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9c1bf6f037fa4dde889eb65d026fda5a |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agricultural production Agriculture Biological fertilization Carbon dioxide Carbon footprint Cash crops Climate change emission reduction Emissions Farm buildings Fertilization Fertilizers Footprint analysis global warming Greenhouse gases Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycles Mechanization Sustainable development Temporal variations Tobacco Tobacco industry |
title | Spatiotemporal variation of the carbon footprint of tobacco production from 2004 to 2017 in China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A51%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatiotemporal%20variation%20of%20the%20carbon%20footprint%20of%20tobacco%20production%20from%202004%20to%202017%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Zheng,%20Yu&rft.date=2024-04-18&rft.volume=12&rft.issn=2296-665X&rft.eissn=2296-665X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1331530&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3040140100%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-c001c7a986aea28c10a9f611c9749248e16e7d91065c512df5d65a663a7ff3613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3040140100&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |