Standardised alcohol screening in primary health care services targeting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia

• Published in: Addiction science & clinical practice 2018-03, Vol.13 (1), p.5-11, Article 5
• Main Authors: Islam, M Mofizul, Oni, Helen T, Lee, K S Kylie, Hayman, Noel, Wilson, Scott, Harrison, Kristie, Hummerston, Beth, Ivers, Rowena, Conigrave, Katherine M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander; Alcohol screening; Alcoholism - diagnosis; Alcoholism - ethnology; AUDIT; AUDIT-C; Australia; Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples; Humans; Indigenous; IRIS; Mass Screening - methods; Mass Screening - standards; Primary Health Care - methods; Reproducibility of Results; Review; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
• ISSN: 1940-0640; 1940-0632; 1940-0640
• DOI: 10.1186/s13722-018-0108-2

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs) around Australia have been asked to standardise screening for unhealthy drinking. Accordingly, screening with the 3-item AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption) tool has become a national key performance indicator. Here we provide an overview of suitability of AUDIT-C and other brief alcohol screening tools for use in ACCHSs. All peer-reviewed literature providing original data on validity, acceptability or feasibility of alcohol screening tools among Indigenous Australians was reviewed. Narrative synthesis was used to identify themes and integrate results. Three screening tools-full AUDIT, AUDIT-3 (third question of AUDIT) and CAGE (Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilty and Eye-opener) have been validated against other consumption measures, and found to correspond well. Short forms of AUDIT have also been found to compare well with full AUDIT, and were preferred by primary care staff. Help was often required with converting consumption into standard drinks. Researchers commented that AUDIT and its short forms prompted reflection on drinking. Another tool, the Indigenous Risk Impact Screen (IRIS), jointly screens for alcohol, drug and mental health risk, but is relatively long (13 items). IRIS has been validated against dependence scales. AUDIT, IRIS and CAGE have a greater focus on dependence than on hazardous or harmful consumption. Detection of unhealthy drinking before harms occur is a goal of screening, so AUDIT-C offers advantages over tools like IRIS or CAGE which focus on dependence. AUDIT-C's brevity suits integration with general health screening. Further research is needed on facilitating implementation of systematic alcohol screening into Indigenous primary healthcare.