Performance of surfactant blend formulations for controlling gas mobility and foam propagation under reservoir conditions

• Published in: Journal of petroleum exploration and production technology 2020-12, Vol.10 (8), p.3961-3969
• Main Authors: Memon, Muhammad Khan, Elraies, Khaled Abdalla, Al-Mossawy, Mohammed Idrees Ali
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Energy Systems; Foam; Foam quality; Gas mobility; Geology; Industrial and Production Engineering; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis; Offshore Engineering; Original Paper-Production Engineering; Reservoir condition; Surfactant alternating gas
• ISSN: 2190-0558; 2190-0566
• DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-00996-0

The use of surfactant is one of the possible solutions to minimize the mobility of gases and improve the sweep efficiency, but the main problem with this process is its stability in the presence of injection water and crude oil under reservoir conditions. In this study, the three types of surfactant anionic, nonionic and amphoteric are examined in the presence of brine salinity at 96 °C and 1400 psia. To access the potential blended surfactant solutions as gas mobility control, laboratory test including aqueous stability, interfacial tension (IFT) and mobility reduction factor (MRF) were performed. The purpose of MRF is to evaluate the blocking effect of selected optimum surfactant solutions. Based on experimental results, no precipitation was observed by testing the surfactant solutions at reservoir temperature of 96 °C. The tested surfactant solutions reduced the IFT between crude oil and brine. The effectiveness and strength of surfactant solutions without crude oil under reservoir conditions were evaluated. A high value of differential pressure demonstrates that the strong foam was generated inside a core that resulted in delay in breakthrough time and reduction in the gas mobility. High mobility reduction factor result was measured by the solution of blended surfactant 0.6%AOS + 0.6%CA406H. Mobility reduction factor of other tested surfactant solutions was found low due to less generated foam by using CO 2 under reservoir conditions. The result of these tested surfactant solutions can provide the better understanding of the mechanisms behind generated foam stability and guideline for their implementation as gas mobility control during the process of surfactant alternating gas injection.