Loading…

Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by Levulinic Acid Plus Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and their Antibacterial Mechanisms on S. aureus Biofilms by Transcriptomic Analysis

•Levulinic acid and SDS showed synergistic bactericidal efficacy against S. aureus.•EPS and cells in the S. aureus biofilms were reduced by levulinic acid plus SDS.•SDS was the main active agent in the antimicrobial action of the combination.•Surface proteins, polysaccharides, and regulators assist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of food protection 2023-03, Vol.86 (3), p.100050-100050, Article 100050
Main Authors: Yan, Xiaoxue, Xu, Yiwei, Shen, Cangliang, Chen, Dong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e98508fd87069f64a9aa719fc36bd4a8d85d84759e3dd557a0c58fbbf41765293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e98508fd87069f64a9aa719fc36bd4a8d85d84759e3dd557a0c58fbbf41765293
container_end_page 100050
container_issue 3
container_start_page 100050
container_title Journal of food protection
container_volume 86
creator Yan, Xiaoxue
Xu, Yiwei
Shen, Cangliang
Chen, Dong
description •Levulinic acid and SDS showed synergistic bactericidal efficacy against S. aureus.•EPS and cells in the S. aureus biofilms were reduced by levulinic acid plus SDS.•SDS was the main active agent in the antimicrobial action of the combination.•Surface proteins, polysaccharides, and regulators assist the adaptive response. The combination of levulinic acid (LVA) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in recent years has shown a considerable potential to use as an antimicrobial intervention. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of the combination against Staphylococcus aureus in both planktonic and biofilm states and to investigate the transcriptional changes in S. aureus biofilms coincubated with sublethal concentrations of LVA and/or SDS. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of LVA and SDS determined by the microdilution method were 3.125 and 0.039 mg/mL, respectively. An additive bacteriostatic interaction (fractional inhibitory concentration index = 1) between the two compounds was observed by the checkerboard assay, whereas a synergistic bactericidal activity was displayed by the time-kill assay. The biomass and viable cells in the biofilms were reduced by both antimicrobials either alone or in combination in a dose-dependent manner. Transcriptomics indicated that more differentially expressed (DE) genes were observed in the biofilm treated with SDS (103 up- and 205 downregulated DE genes) and LVA + SDS (187 up and 162 down) than that coincubated with LVA (34 up and 32 down). The SDS and LVA + SDS treatments mainly affected the expression of genes responsible for cell surface proteins, virulence factors, adhesins, and capsular polysaccharides. Both the antibiofilm assay and the transcriptomics indicated that SDS, not LVA, was the major chemical contributing to the antibacterial efficacy of the combination. This study reveals the behavioral responses and protective mechanisms of S. aureus to LVA and SDS applied individually or in combination.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100050
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d5fc89075974c4184aecfeeee0ccbde</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0362028X23067194</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9d5fc89075974c4184aecfeeee0ccbde</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2834261840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e98508fd87069f64a9aa719fc36bd4a8d85d84759e3dd557a0c58fbbf41765293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9uEzEQxlcIRNPCA3BBPnJJ8P7z2uIUWgqRgkBKkbhZ3vGYOPKug-2NlCfiNXGatkfwZeTRN7_PHn1F8aaki5KW7P1usTP7RUWrOt8pbemzYlaKppkLKrrnxYzWrJrTiv-8KC5j3GVJJSr2sriomShZ23az4s9qVJDsQSXrR-IN2SS13x6dBw8wRaKmgLn0R7LGw-TsaIEswWry3eX2xms7DeTGa4SjI5vJGZWQqFGTtEUbyHJMts8GGKxy5CvCVo02DpFks83ikf7RemPdcG9zF9QYIdh98sPJa1TuGG18VbwwykV8_VCvih-3n-6uv8zX3z6vrpfrOTSiTXMUvKXcaN5RJgxrlFCqK4WBmvW6UVzzVvOmawXWWucFKAotN31vmrJjbSXqq2J15mqvdnIf7KDCUXpl5X3Dh19ShWTBoRS6NcAFzbSugabkjUIwmA8F6DVm1rszax_87wljkoONgM6pEf0UZcXrpmJ5jv5f2nHGy7qq6ywtz1IIPsaA5umVJZWnWMidzLGQp1jIcyzyzNsH_NQPqJ8mHnOQBR_OAsy7PVgMMoLFEVDbgJDy5-0_8H8BSdjLIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786813233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by Levulinic Acid Plus Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and their Antibacterial Mechanisms on S. aureus Biofilms by Transcriptomic Analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Yan, Xiaoxue ; Xu, Yiwei ; Shen, Cangliang ; Chen, Dong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Xiaoxue ; Xu, Yiwei ; Shen, Cangliang ; Chen, Dong</creatorcontrib><description>•Levulinic acid and SDS showed synergistic bactericidal efficacy against S. aureus.•EPS and cells in the S. aureus biofilms were reduced by levulinic acid plus SDS.•SDS was the main active agent in the antimicrobial action of the combination.•Surface proteins, polysaccharides, and regulators assist the adaptive response. The combination of levulinic acid (LVA) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in recent years has shown a considerable potential to use as an antimicrobial intervention. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of the combination against Staphylococcus aureus in both planktonic and biofilm states and to investigate the transcriptional changes in S. aureus biofilms coincubated with sublethal concentrations of LVA and/or SDS. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of LVA and SDS determined by the microdilution method were 3.125 and 0.039 mg/mL, respectively. An additive bacteriostatic interaction (fractional inhibitory concentration index = 1) between the two compounds was observed by the checkerboard assay, whereas a synergistic bactericidal activity was displayed by the time-kill assay. The biomass and viable cells in the biofilms were reduced by both antimicrobials either alone or in combination in a dose-dependent manner. Transcriptomics indicated that more differentially expressed (DE) genes were observed in the biofilm treated with SDS (103 up- and 205 downregulated DE genes) and LVA + SDS (187 up and 162 down) than that coincubated with LVA (34 up and 32 down). The SDS and LVA + SDS treatments mainly affected the expression of genes responsible for cell surface proteins, virulence factors, adhesins, and capsular polysaccharides. Both the antibiofilm assay and the transcriptomics indicated that SDS, not LVA, was the major chemical contributing to the antibacterial efficacy of the combination. This study reveals the behavioral responses and protective mechanisms of S. aureus to LVA and SDS applied individually or in combination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36916557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>adhesins ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; anti-infective agents ; antibacterial properties ; Biofilm ; Biofilms ; biomass ; dose response ; food safety ; Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) ; Humans ; levulinic acid ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Organic acid ; plankton ; polysaccharides ; RNA-seq ; sodium dodecyl sulfate ; Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - pharmacology ; Staphylococcal Infections ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Sub-MICs ; transcription (genetics) ; Transcriptome ; transcriptomics ; virulence</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2023-03, Vol.86 (3), p.100050-100050, Article 100050</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e98508fd87069f64a9aa719fc36bd4a8d85d84759e3dd557a0c58fbbf41765293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e98508fd87069f64a9aa719fc36bd4a8d85d84759e3dd557a0c58fbbf41765293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X23067194$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3535,27903,27904,45759</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36916557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Xiaoxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Cangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dong</creatorcontrib><title>Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by Levulinic Acid Plus Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and their Antibacterial Mechanisms on S. aureus Biofilms by Transcriptomic Analysis</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>•Levulinic acid and SDS showed synergistic bactericidal efficacy against S. aureus.•EPS and cells in the S. aureus biofilms were reduced by levulinic acid plus SDS.•SDS was the main active agent in the antimicrobial action of the combination.•Surface proteins, polysaccharides, and regulators assist the adaptive response. The combination of levulinic acid (LVA) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in recent years has shown a considerable potential to use as an antimicrobial intervention. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of the combination against Staphylococcus aureus in both planktonic and biofilm states and to investigate the transcriptional changes in S. aureus biofilms coincubated with sublethal concentrations of LVA and/or SDS. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of LVA and SDS determined by the microdilution method were 3.125 and 0.039 mg/mL, respectively. An additive bacteriostatic interaction (fractional inhibitory concentration index = 1) between the two compounds was observed by the checkerboard assay, whereas a synergistic bactericidal activity was displayed by the time-kill assay. The biomass and viable cells in the biofilms were reduced by both antimicrobials either alone or in combination in a dose-dependent manner. Transcriptomics indicated that more differentially expressed (DE) genes were observed in the biofilm treated with SDS (103 up- and 205 downregulated DE genes) and LVA + SDS (187 up and 162 down) than that coincubated with LVA (34 up and 32 down). The SDS and LVA + SDS treatments mainly affected the expression of genes responsible for cell surface proteins, virulence factors, adhesins, and capsular polysaccharides. Both the antibiofilm assay and the transcriptomics indicated that SDS, not LVA, was the major chemical contributing to the antibacterial efficacy of the combination. This study reveals the behavioral responses and protective mechanisms of S. aureus to LVA and SDS applied individually or in combination.</description><subject>adhesins</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>anti-infective agents</subject><subject>antibacterial properties</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>dose response</subject><subject>food safety</subject><subject>Generally recognized as safe (GRAS)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>levulinic acid</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Organic acid</subject><subject>plankton</subject><subject>polysaccharides</subject><subject>RNA-seq</subject><subject>sodium dodecyl sulfate</subject><subject>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - pharmacology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Sub-MICs</subject><subject>transcription (genetics)</subject><subject>Transcriptome</subject><subject>transcriptomics</subject><subject>virulence</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9uEzEQxlcIRNPCA3BBPnJJ8P7z2uIUWgqRgkBKkbhZ3vGYOPKug-2NlCfiNXGatkfwZeTRN7_PHn1F8aaki5KW7P1usTP7RUWrOt8pbemzYlaKppkLKrrnxYzWrJrTiv-8KC5j3GVJJSr2sriomShZ23az4s9qVJDsQSXrR-IN2SS13x6dBw8wRaKmgLn0R7LGw-TsaIEswWry3eX2xms7DeTGa4SjI5vJGZWQqFGTtEUbyHJMts8GGKxy5CvCVo02DpFks83ikf7RemPdcG9zF9QYIdh98sPJa1TuGG18VbwwykV8_VCvih-3n-6uv8zX3z6vrpfrOTSiTXMUvKXcaN5RJgxrlFCqK4WBmvW6UVzzVvOmawXWWucFKAotN31vmrJjbSXqq2J15mqvdnIf7KDCUXpl5X3Dh19ShWTBoRS6NcAFzbSugabkjUIwmA8F6DVm1rszax_87wljkoONgM6pEf0UZcXrpmJ5jv5f2nHGy7qq6ywtz1IIPsaA5umVJZWnWMidzLGQp1jIcyzyzNsH_NQPqJ8mHnOQBR_OAsy7PVgMMoLFEVDbgJDy5-0_8H8BSdjLIw</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Yan, Xiaoxue</creator><creator>Xu, Yiwei</creator><creator>Shen, Cangliang</creator><creator>Chen, Dong</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by Levulinic Acid Plus Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and their Antibacterial Mechanisms on S. aureus Biofilms by Transcriptomic Analysis</title><author>Yan, Xiaoxue ; Xu, Yiwei ; Shen, Cangliang ; Chen, Dong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e98508fd87069f64a9aa719fc36bd4a8d85d84759e3dd557a0c58fbbf41765293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>adhesins</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>anti-infective agents</topic><topic>antibacterial properties</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>dose response</topic><topic>food safety</topic><topic>Generally recognized as safe (GRAS)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>levulinic acid</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Organic acid</topic><topic>plankton</topic><topic>polysaccharides</topic><topic>RNA-seq</topic><topic>sodium dodecyl sulfate</topic><topic>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - pharmacology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Sub-MICs</topic><topic>transcription (genetics)</topic><topic>Transcriptome</topic><topic>transcriptomics</topic><topic>virulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Xiaoxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Cangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dong</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Xiaoxue</au><au>Xu, Yiwei</au><au>Shen, Cangliang</au><au>Chen, Dong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by Levulinic Acid Plus Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and their Antibacterial Mechanisms on S. aureus Biofilms by Transcriptomic Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>100050</spage><epage>100050</epage><pages>100050-100050</pages><artnum>100050</artnum><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><abstract>•Levulinic acid and SDS showed synergistic bactericidal efficacy against S. aureus.•EPS and cells in the S. aureus biofilms were reduced by levulinic acid plus SDS.•SDS was the main active agent in the antimicrobial action of the combination.•Surface proteins, polysaccharides, and regulators assist the adaptive response. The combination of levulinic acid (LVA) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in recent years has shown a considerable potential to use as an antimicrobial intervention. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of the combination against Staphylococcus aureus in both planktonic and biofilm states and to investigate the transcriptional changes in S. aureus biofilms coincubated with sublethal concentrations of LVA and/or SDS. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of LVA and SDS determined by the microdilution method were 3.125 and 0.039 mg/mL, respectively. An additive bacteriostatic interaction (fractional inhibitory concentration index = 1) between the two compounds was observed by the checkerboard assay, whereas a synergistic bactericidal activity was displayed by the time-kill assay. The biomass and viable cells in the biofilms were reduced by both antimicrobials either alone or in combination in a dose-dependent manner. Transcriptomics indicated that more differentially expressed (DE) genes were observed in the biofilm treated with SDS (103 up- and 205 downregulated DE genes) and LVA + SDS (187 up and 162 down) than that coincubated with LVA (34 up and 32 down). The SDS and LVA + SDS treatments mainly affected the expression of genes responsible for cell surface proteins, virulence factors, adhesins, and capsular polysaccharides. Both the antibiofilm assay and the transcriptomics indicated that SDS, not LVA, was the major chemical contributing to the antibacterial efficacy of the combination. This study reveals the behavioral responses and protective mechanisms of S. aureus to LVA and SDS applied individually or in combination.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36916557</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100050</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-028X
ispartof Journal of food protection, 2023-03, Vol.86 (3), p.100050-100050, Article 100050
issn 0362-028X
1944-9097
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d5fc89075974c4184aecfeeee0ccbde
source ScienceDirect®
subjects adhesins
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
anti-infective agents
antibacterial properties
Biofilm
Biofilms
biomass
dose response
food safety
Generally recognized as safe (GRAS)
Humans
levulinic acid
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Organic acid
plankton
polysaccharides
RNA-seq
sodium dodecyl sulfate
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - pharmacology
Staphylococcal Infections
Staphylococcus aureus
Sub-MICs
transcription (genetics)
Transcriptome
transcriptomics
virulence
title Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by Levulinic Acid Plus Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and their Antibacterial Mechanisms on S. aureus Biofilms by Transcriptomic Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A38%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inactivation%20of%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20by%20Levulinic%20Acid%20Plus%20Sodium%20Dodecyl%20Sulfate%20and%20their%20Antibacterial%20Mechanisms%20on%20S.%20aureus%20Biofilms%20by%20Transcriptomic%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Yan,%20Xiaoxue&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=100050&rft.epage=100050&rft.pages=100050-100050&rft.artnum=100050&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2834261840%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e98508fd87069f64a9aa719fc36bd4a8d85d84759e3dd557a0c58fbbf41765293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786813233&rft_id=info:pmid/36916557&rfr_iscdi=true