Loading…

Influence of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in cage-free aviary housing

Within aviary systems, open litter areas are provided to allow hens to express a more robust behavioral repertoire. However, data is limited on the influence forage substrates have on environmental and egg microbiology. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of forage substrates on en...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied poultry research 2022-03, Vol.31 (1), p.100225, Article 100225
Main Authors: Garcia, J.S., Jones, D.R., Gast, R.K., Robison, C.I., Regmi, P., Karcher, D.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-42bbb20ed400268421939e1531b751a586a084fe9a3fbb3526af3c9c6bf2d32d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-42bbb20ed400268421939e1531b751a586a084fe9a3fbb3526af3c9c6bf2d32d3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 100225
container_title Journal of applied poultry research
container_volume 31
creator Garcia, J.S.
Jones, D.R.
Gast, R.K.
Robison, C.I.
Regmi, P.
Karcher, D.M.
description Within aviary systems, open litter areas are provided to allow hens to express a more robust behavioral repertoire. However, data is limited on the influence forage substrates have on environmental and egg microbiology. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in aviary housing systems. Hens were housed in a commercial, cage-free multitier aviary with open litter areas, which contained one of three forage substrates (straw, artificial turf, and shavings) or bare concrete floors. Environmental and egg sampling occurred at hen ages: 25, 37, 51, and 64 wk. Drag swab aerobic bacteria levels from the litter area of the artificial turf group were lower (6.86 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrate groups (P < 0.001; concrete: 7.39 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.40 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.16 log cfu/mL) as the flocks aged. As the flocks aged, lower levels of yeasts and molds were observed in the litter area of the artificial turf group (6.72 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrates (P < 0.02; concrete: 7.54 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.36 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.61 log cfu/mL). No differences in Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria spp. prevalence were observed between the substrate groups. Although aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, yeasts and molds, and pathogens were present in the environment of the substrate groups, it did not impact egg microbiology. The lower microbial and yeasts and molds levels in this study suggest that artificial turf could be an appropriate forage substrate for commercial cage-free aviary housing, however further research is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.japr.2021.100225
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d8b43556eb74a309be67b5afc77f53d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105661712100088X</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9d8b43556eb74a309be67b5afc77f53d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S105661712100088X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-42bbb20ed400268421939e1531b751a586a084fe9a3fbb3526af3c9c6bf2d32d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1q3DAQhU1poNskL5ArvYC3-rFkG3pTlrZZCOQmuVZG8siR8UqL5F3Yt6_cLb0MDGgYdA7nfFX1wOiWUaa-TdsJjmnLKWflQDmXn6oNk6KtaSPaz2WnUtWKtexL9TXnqXwRtOOb6m0f3HzCYJFER1xMMCLJJ5OXBAtmEgPBcPYphgOGBWYCYSA4juTgbYrGxzmOF-IDsUVYu4RI4OwhXch7PGUfxrvqxsGc8f7fe1u9_vr5snusn55_73c_nmrbMLrUDTfGcIpDU6KpruGsFz2WBsy0koHsFNCucdiDcMYIyRU4YXurjOODKHNb7a--Q4RJH5M_lBA6gtd_DzGNGtLi7Yy6HzrTCCkVmrYBQXuDqjUSnG1bJ8Xqxa9epWLOCd1_P0b1yltPeuWtV976yruIvl9FWFqePSadrV_BDj6hXUoM_5H8DyGdig4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in cage-free aviary housing</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Garcia, J.S. ; Jones, D.R. ; Gast, R.K. ; Robison, C.I. ; Regmi, P. ; Karcher, D.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J.S. ; Jones, D.R. ; Gast, R.K. ; Robison, C.I. ; Regmi, P. ; Karcher, D.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Within aviary systems, open litter areas are provided to allow hens to express a more robust behavioral repertoire. However, data is limited on the influence forage substrates have on environmental and egg microbiology. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in aviary housing systems. Hens were housed in a commercial, cage-free multitier aviary with open litter areas, which contained one of three forage substrates (straw, artificial turf, and shavings) or bare concrete floors. Environmental and egg sampling occurred at hen ages: 25, 37, 51, and 64 wk. Drag swab aerobic bacteria levels from the litter area of the artificial turf group were lower (6.86 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrate groups (P &lt; 0.001; concrete: 7.39 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.40 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.16 log cfu/mL) as the flocks aged. As the flocks aged, lower levels of yeasts and molds were observed in the litter area of the artificial turf group (6.72 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrates (P &lt; 0.02; concrete: 7.54 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.36 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.61 log cfu/mL). No differences in Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria spp. prevalence were observed between the substrate groups. Although aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, yeasts and molds, and pathogens were present in the environment of the substrate groups, it did not impact egg microbiology. The lower microbial and yeasts and molds levels in this study suggest that artificial turf could be an appropriate forage substrate for commercial cage-free aviary housing, however further research is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-6171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-0437</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.japr.2021.100225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>aviary ; eggs ; forage substrate ; microbiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied poultry research, 2022-03, Vol.31 (1), p.100225, Article 100225</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-42bbb20ed400268421939e1531b751a586a084fe9a3fbb3526af3c9c6bf2d32d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-42bbb20ed400268421939e1531b751a586a084fe9a3fbb3526af3c9c6bf2d32d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0760-4283 ; 0000-0001-8863-8559 ; 0000-0003-3519-6974</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105661712100088X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gast, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robison, C.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regmi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, D.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in cage-free aviary housing</title><title>Journal of applied poultry research</title><description>Within aviary systems, open litter areas are provided to allow hens to express a more robust behavioral repertoire. However, data is limited on the influence forage substrates have on environmental and egg microbiology. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in aviary housing systems. Hens were housed in a commercial, cage-free multitier aviary with open litter areas, which contained one of three forage substrates (straw, artificial turf, and shavings) or bare concrete floors. Environmental and egg sampling occurred at hen ages: 25, 37, 51, and 64 wk. Drag swab aerobic bacteria levels from the litter area of the artificial turf group were lower (6.86 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrate groups (P &lt; 0.001; concrete: 7.39 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.40 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.16 log cfu/mL) as the flocks aged. As the flocks aged, lower levels of yeasts and molds were observed in the litter area of the artificial turf group (6.72 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrates (P &lt; 0.02; concrete: 7.54 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.36 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.61 log cfu/mL). No differences in Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria spp. prevalence were observed between the substrate groups. Although aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, yeasts and molds, and pathogens were present in the environment of the substrate groups, it did not impact egg microbiology. The lower microbial and yeasts and molds levels in this study suggest that artificial turf could be an appropriate forage substrate for commercial cage-free aviary housing, however further research is needed.</description><subject>aviary</subject><subject>eggs</subject><subject>forage substrate</subject><subject>microbiology</subject><issn>1056-6171</issn><issn>1537-0437</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1q3DAQhU1poNskL5ArvYC3-rFkG3pTlrZZCOQmuVZG8siR8UqL5F3Yt6_cLb0MDGgYdA7nfFX1wOiWUaa-TdsJjmnLKWflQDmXn6oNk6KtaSPaz2WnUtWKtexL9TXnqXwRtOOb6m0f3HzCYJFER1xMMCLJJ5OXBAtmEgPBcPYphgOGBWYCYSA4juTgbYrGxzmOF-IDsUVYu4RI4OwhXch7PGUfxrvqxsGc8f7fe1u9_vr5snusn55_73c_nmrbMLrUDTfGcIpDU6KpruGsFz2WBsy0koHsFNCucdiDcMYIyRU4YXurjOODKHNb7a--Q4RJH5M_lBA6gtd_DzGNGtLi7Yy6HzrTCCkVmrYBQXuDqjUSnG1bJ8Xqxa9epWLOCd1_P0b1yltPeuWtV976yruIvl9FWFqePSadrV_BDj6hXUoM_5H8DyGdig4</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Garcia, J.S.</creator><creator>Jones, D.R.</creator><creator>Gast, R.K.</creator><creator>Robison, C.I.</creator><creator>Regmi, P.</creator><creator>Karcher, D.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-8559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-6974</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Influence of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in cage-free aviary housing</title><author>Garcia, J.S. ; Jones, D.R. ; Gast, R.K. ; Robison, C.I. ; Regmi, P. ; Karcher, D.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-42bbb20ed400268421939e1531b751a586a084fe9a3fbb3526af3c9c6bf2d32d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>aviary</topic><topic>eggs</topic><topic>forage substrate</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gast, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robison, C.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regmi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, D.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied poultry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia, J.S.</au><au>Jones, D.R.</au><au>Gast, R.K.</au><au>Robison, C.I.</au><au>Regmi, P.</au><au>Karcher, D.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in cage-free aviary housing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied poultry research</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100225</spage><pages>100225-</pages><artnum>100225</artnum><issn>1056-6171</issn><eissn>1537-0437</eissn><abstract>Within aviary systems, open litter areas are provided to allow hens to express a more robust behavioral repertoire. However, data is limited on the influence forage substrates have on environmental and egg microbiology. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in aviary housing systems. Hens were housed in a commercial, cage-free multitier aviary with open litter areas, which contained one of three forage substrates (straw, artificial turf, and shavings) or bare concrete floors. Environmental and egg sampling occurred at hen ages: 25, 37, 51, and 64 wk. Drag swab aerobic bacteria levels from the litter area of the artificial turf group were lower (6.86 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrate groups (P &lt; 0.001; concrete: 7.39 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.40 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.16 log cfu/mL) as the flocks aged. As the flocks aged, lower levels of yeasts and molds were observed in the litter area of the artificial turf group (6.72 log cfu/mL) compared to the other substrates (P &lt; 0.02; concrete: 7.54 log cfu/mL; straw: 7.36 log cfu/mL; shavings: 7.61 log cfu/mL). No differences in Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria spp. prevalence were observed between the substrate groups. Although aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, yeasts and molds, and pathogens were present in the environment of the substrate groups, it did not impact egg microbiology. The lower microbial and yeasts and molds levels in this study suggest that artificial turf could be an appropriate forage substrate for commercial cage-free aviary housing, however further research is needed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.japr.2021.100225</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-8559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-6974</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1056-6171
ispartof Journal of applied poultry research, 2022-03, Vol.31 (1), p.100225, Article 100225
issn 1056-6171
1537-0437
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d8b43556eb74a309be67b5afc77f53d
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects aviary
eggs
forage substrate
microbiology
title Influence of forage substrates on environmental and egg microbiology in cage-free aviary housing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20forage%20substrates%20on%20environmental%20and%20egg%20microbiology%20in%20cage-free%20aviary%20housing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20poultry%20research&rft.au=Garcia,%20J.S.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100225&rft.pages=100225-&rft.artnum=100225&rft.issn=1056-6171&rft.eissn=1537-0437&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.japr.2021.100225&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES105661712100088X%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-42bbb20ed400268421939e1531b751a586a084fe9a3fbb3526af3c9c6bf2d32d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true